On April 1, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) alluded to the “dragon-elephant” tango in his message to Indian President Droupadi Murmu to mark the 75th anniversary of the establishment of India-China diplomatic relations. The two countries have patched up after their border agreement in October last year, but the recent India-Pakistan tensions following the Pahalgam terror attack are testing the limits of their fragile truce.
Beijing’s moves in South Asia after the terror attack confirm the widely held view in the Indian community that last year’s border agreement was just a “tactical pause.” The tensions between India and Pakistan have uncovered China’s “tango” with India, as Beijing has thrown its weight fully behind Islamabad.
China is supporting Pakistan in an attempt to harm its competitors using other countries. Pakistan and North Korea (both went nuclear with China’s assistance) have been two strategic proxies helping China in its regional ambitions in south and east Asia. Beijing is trying to thwart New Delhi’s desire to be a global power and keep it bogged down by bolstering Islamabad.
China has three interests in its deep ties with Pakistan:
One, it helps Beijing avoid the internationalization of the Uighur issue through the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation, in which Pakistan protects China’s record of targeting Uighurs in Xinjiang.
Second, it increases India’s vulnerability by raising the specter of a “two-front” war.
Third, Pakistan is the linchpin of China’s response to the US and India in the Indo-Pacific region. Things could become more complex for India, as the new dispensation in Bangladesh seems disposed toward China and Pakistan.
China offers Pakistan diplomatic and military protection at a time when the West’s interest in the country might be waning. Its support in the Kashmir issue and in Pakistan’s so-called “fight against terrorism” paints Islamabad’s use of terrorism as a state policy. It is no surprise that anti-India terrorists such as Hafiz Saeed, Masood Azhar or the Pakistani government do not utter a single word against the oppression of Uighurs in Xinjiang.
The “China-Pakistan tango” is now also extending to Eurasia. Azerbaijan had supported Pakistan’s “hollow” demand for a transparent investigation into the Pahalgam terror attack.
Islamabad had supplied weapons to Baku during its war with Armenia, which received military hardware from New Delhi. China had previously signed a partnership with Azerbaijan, an important country for the so-called Middle Corridor of the Belt and Road Initiative.
The Pakistan-China-Turkey cooperation is also of concern to India, as Ankara and Beijing supplied weapons to Pakistan after the Pahalgam attack. China and Turkey also have a history of supporting Pakistan at the Financial Action Task Force, despite well-known Pakistani links to terrorism.
India conducted its “Operation Sindoor” on Wednesday last week. Azerbaijan and Turkey supported Pakistan, while China said it “regretted” India’s military operation against Pakistan-based terrorists.
Before India’s operation, China not only supported Pakistan’s call for an independent probe in the Pahalgam attack, but also backed its “legitimate security concerns and its efforts to safeguard its security and strategic interests.”
The double standards in China’s approach are quite clear.
In contrast to China’s response, the US supported India’s right to self-defense. President William Lai (賴清德) also condemned the attack on Indian civilians, saying that “our hearts are with the people of India.” Russia and Israel have backed India amid the ongoing tensions as well.
India would have to factor in the new developments in the “China-Pakistan” nexus in the Indo-Pacific region and in Eurasia. It would also need to bolster its ties with Taiwan, the US, France, Russia, Japan, Australia, Greece, Israel, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Armenia and Afghanistan.
Raj Kumar Sharma is Ministry of Foreign Affairs Taiwan fellow at National Chengchi University. Geetanjali Atri is a sociologist based in Taipei.
Chinese state-owned companies COSCO Shipping Corporation and China Merchants have a 30 percent stake in Kaohsiung Port’s Kao Ming Container Terminal (Terminal No. 6) and COSCO leases Berths 65 and 66. It is extremely dangerous to allow Chinese companies or state-owned companies to operate critical infrastructure. Deterrence theorists are familiar with the concepts of deterrence “by punishment” and “by denial.” Deterrence by punishment threatens an aggressor with prohibitive costs (like retaliation or sanctions) that outweigh the benefits of their action, while deterrence by denial aims to make an attack so difficult that it becomes pointless. Elbridge Colby, currently serving as the Under
The Ministry of the Interior on Thursday last week said it ordered Internet service providers to block access to Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu (小紅書, also known as RedNote in English) for a year, citing security risks and more than 1,700 alleged fraud cases on the platform since last year. The order took effect immediately, abruptly affecting more than 3 million users in Taiwan, and sparked discussions among politicians, online influencers and the public. The platform is often described as China’s version of Instagram or Pinterest, combining visual social media with e-commerce, and its users are predominantly young urban women,
Most Hong Kongers ignored the elections for its Legislative Council (LegCo) in 2021 and did so once again on Sunday. Unlike in 2021, moderate democrats who pledged their allegiance to Beijing were absent from the ballots this year. The electoral system overhaul is apparent revenge by Beijing for the democracy movement. On Sunday, the Hong Kong “patriots-only” election of the LegCo had a record-low turnout in the five geographical constituencies, with only 1.3 million people casting their ballots on the only seats that most Hong Kongers are eligible to vote for. Blank and invalid votes were up 50 percent from the previous
Alarm bells over a “hollowing out” of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry and US demands for “protection money” have fueled a panic over Taiwan. To understand how misplaced these fears are, consider the movements of global technology giants. Nvidia Corp CEO Jensen Huang (黃仁勳), Advanced Micro Devices Inc (AMD) CEO Lisa Su (蘇姿丰) and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家) could undoubtedly understand the situation best, and they continue to make key investments in Taiwan. They do not make decisions on a whim. They are the architects of global computing power strategy and possess the highest levels of industry knowledge. No