On April 1, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) alluded to the “dragon-elephant” tango in his message to Indian President Droupadi Murmu to mark the 75th anniversary of the establishment of India-China diplomatic relations. The two countries have patched up after their border agreement in October last year, but the recent India-Pakistan tensions following the Pahalgam terror attack are testing the limits of their fragile truce.
Beijing’s moves in South Asia after the terror attack confirm the widely held view in the Indian community that last year’s border agreement was just a “tactical pause.” The tensions between India and Pakistan have uncovered China’s “tango” with India, as Beijing has thrown its weight fully behind Islamabad.
China is supporting Pakistan in an attempt to harm its competitors using other countries. Pakistan and North Korea (both went nuclear with China’s assistance) have been two strategic proxies helping China in its regional ambitions in south and east Asia. Beijing is trying to thwart New Delhi’s desire to be a global power and keep it bogged down by bolstering Islamabad.
China has three interests in its deep ties with Pakistan:
One, it helps Beijing avoid the internationalization of the Uighur issue through the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation, in which Pakistan protects China’s record of targeting Uighurs in Xinjiang.
Second, it increases India’s vulnerability by raising the specter of a “two-front” war.
Third, Pakistan is the linchpin of China’s response to the US and India in the Indo-Pacific region. Things could become more complex for India, as the new dispensation in Bangladesh seems disposed toward China and Pakistan.
China offers Pakistan diplomatic and military protection at a time when the West’s interest in the country might be waning. Its support in the Kashmir issue and in Pakistan’s so-called “fight against terrorism” paints Islamabad’s use of terrorism as a state policy. It is no surprise that anti-India terrorists such as Hafiz Saeed, Masood Azhar or the Pakistani government do not utter a single word against the oppression of Uighurs in Xinjiang.
The “China-Pakistan tango” is now also extending to Eurasia. Azerbaijan had supported Pakistan’s “hollow” demand for a transparent investigation into the Pahalgam terror attack.
Islamabad had supplied weapons to Baku during its war with Armenia, which received military hardware from New Delhi. China had previously signed a partnership with Azerbaijan, an important country for the so-called Middle Corridor of the Belt and Road Initiative.
The Pakistan-China-Turkey cooperation is also of concern to India, as Ankara and Beijing supplied weapons to Pakistan after the Pahalgam attack. China and Turkey also have a history of supporting Pakistan at the Financial Action Task Force, despite well-known Pakistani links to terrorism.
India conducted its “Operation Sindoor” on Wednesday last week. Azerbaijan and Turkey supported Pakistan, while China said it “regretted” India’s military operation against Pakistan-based terrorists.
Before India’s operation, China not only supported Pakistan’s call for an independent probe in the Pahalgam attack, but also backed its “legitimate security concerns and its efforts to safeguard its security and strategic interests.”
The double standards in China’s approach are quite clear.
In contrast to China’s response, the US supported India’s right to self-defense. President William Lai (賴清德) also condemned the attack on Indian civilians, saying that “our hearts are with the people of India.” Russia and Israel have backed India amid the ongoing tensions as well.
India would have to factor in the new developments in the “China-Pakistan” nexus in the Indo-Pacific region and in Eurasia. It would also need to bolster its ties with Taiwan, the US, France, Russia, Japan, Australia, Greece, Israel, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Armenia and Afghanistan.
Raj Kumar Sharma is Ministry of Foreign Affairs Taiwan fellow at National Chengchi University. Geetanjali Atri is a sociologist based in Taipei.
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Last week, Nvidia chief executive officer Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) unveiled the location of Nvidia’s new Taipei headquarters and announced plans to build the world’s first large-scale artificial intelligence (AI) supercomputer in Taiwan. In Taipei, Huang’s announcement was welcomed as a milestone for Taiwan’s tech industry. However, beneath the excitement lies a significant question: Can Taiwan’s electricity infrastructure, especially its renewable energy supply, keep up with growing demand from AI chipmaking? Despite its leadership in digital hardware, Taiwan lags behind in renewable energy adoption. Moreover, the electricity grid is already experiencing supply shortages. As Taiwan’s role in AI manufacturing expands, it is critical that
RSS