Former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator and National Dong Hwa University academic Yosi Takun (孔文吉) — a member of the Sediq community — traveled to China to attend an exchange event hosted by Yunnan Minzu University.
There, he repeated the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “united front” slogans. I strongly agree with Malas Takisdahuan’s (邱孟玲) criticism of Yosi’s remarks in her article published in the Liberty Times — sister newspaper of the Taipei Times — on Friday. This article serves to support and respond to Malas’ arguments.
There were many falsehoods in Yosi’s remarks. The only reasonable statement he made was that “minority cultures are an important part of Chinese civilization.” However, Taiwanese indigenous peoples are not part of China’s minority cultures.
The “Out of Africa” theory — a theory explaining the spread of humanity widely accepted in contemporary academic circles — proposes that all humans share a common ancestor who originated from Africa.
The ancestors of Han Chinese people lived in regions suitable for agricultural development, allowing them to become the dominant ethnic group earlier than the ancestors of minority peoples. As a result, they were able to develop more complex political systems much earlier, and regarded themselves as the only advanced and civilized society in the Central Plains area of China — to them, other ethnic groups were barbarians. However, in Chinese history, many other ethnic minorities also developed political systems rivaling the Han’s, such as the Liao, Jin, Yuan and Manchu Qing dynasties. Those cultures are, of course, integral parts of Chinese civilization.
Interactions between Taiwanese indigenous peoples and the Han Chinese have a 400-year history at most. How, then, can Yosi claim that Taiwan’s indigenous cultures are a part of Chinese civilization?
The CCP’s assertions that Taiwanese indigenous peoples are a part of China’s ethnic minorities are based solely on the claim that their early ancestors came from China. However, the migration of those people to Taiwan is estimated to have occurred at least 5,000 to 6,000 years ago, when the world was still made up of tribal societies and the concept of “China” did not exist. If such a weak connection is enough to claim that Taiwan’s indigenous peoples are part of China’s ethnic minorities, then should everyone not return to Africa to reconnect with their long lost relatives?
In its efforts to push its “united front” tactics, the CCP has come up with all kinds of fallacies to take advantage of Taiwan. All the more nauseating is that some Taiwanese politicians have echoed those narratives to gain political resources. By parroting the CCP’s rhetoric, Yosi is siding with the enemy and betraying his people — there is even a possibility that his ancestors fled to Taiwan thousands of years ago to escape persecution by the Han.
One can only hope that, as he does this, Yosi stops to think about how he would face his ancestors when it is time to cross the rainbow bridge.
Chen Chun-bin is a professor at Taipei National University of the Arts.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS