At a meeting of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) Central Standing Committee on Wednesday, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) drew parallels between the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) under President William Lai (賴清德) and the fascism of Germany under Adolf Hitler and Italy under Benito Mussolini.
After being strongly condemned by several foreign representative offices for his comments, including the German Institute Taipei and the Israel Economic and Cultural Office in Taipei, Chu did not correct his mistake. Instead, he doubled down, accusing foreign governments of “interfering in the internal affairs of other countries.”
His response is all too familiar — it is identical to the catch-all phrase the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has used for years to deflect international criticisms of its human rights abuses, military harassment of Taiwan and disruption of the international order. As the chairman of the main opposition party in Taiwan’s democratic system, Chu’s remarks reveal critical errors in his understanding of three things — his political role, history and the international context.
Chu seems to have forgotten that the KMT is an opposition party — it does not hold state power, nor is it the leader of Taiwan’s “internal affairs.” The responses to his comments from foreign representative offices were meant to correct his egregiously inappropriate comparison, not to interfere with domestic politics. Such international interactions are normal in a democratic society, and are a fundamental part of upholding historical memory, human rights and dignity. In reality, accusing others of “interfering in internal affairs” is both an overstep of Chu’s political role and a shirking of political responsibility.
Equating a democratic leader like Lai with Hitler is not only absurd, but also rubs salt on the historical wounds of Europe and the Jewish community. The genocide and countless wartime atrocities committed by the Nazi regime are a memory shared by all of humanity, and represent some of the most painful chapters in the histories of Germany and Israel — they should not be invoked so casually.
By completely ignoring these international sentiments and equating Taiwan’s democracy with authoritarian regimes, Chu has severely damaged Taiwan’s image and infringed upon fundamental diplomatic and humanitarian norms.
The phrase “do not interfere in internal affairs” is the CCP’s standard response to international criticism, specifically when justifying its continued harassment of Taiwan, oppression of Xinjiang and Tibet, and suppression of Hong Kong. For Chu to echo the CCP’s rhetoric raises serious doubts about his values and position, and suggests an alignment with the Beijing’s overall narrative.
Last month, KMT supporter Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑) — suspected of using forged signatures on a recall petition against DPP Legislator Lee Kuen-cheng (李坤城) — arrived at the New Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office for questioning wearing a red armband bearing a swastika, carrying a copy of Hitler’s Mein Kampf and giving a Nazi salute. Despite the public outcry, Chu failed to condemn Sung’s actions. Now, he has exacerbated the issue and attracted an even stronger international backlash. Chu’s actions have demonstrated that he lacks the wisdom expected of a leader and the moral courage required to admit one’s own mistakes.
Telling foreign countries not to “interfere in internal affairs” is a weak excuse to avoid taking responsibility for failed party leadership. Even in a democracy, free speech is not a shield for arbitrarily spreading falsehoods, and parroting authoritarian rhetoric does not deflect legitimate external criticism.
Elliot Yao is a reviewer.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS