At a meeting of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) Central Standing Committee on Wednesday, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) drew parallels between the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) under President William Lai (賴清德) and the fascism of Germany under Adolf Hitler and Italy under Benito Mussolini.
After being strongly condemned by several foreign representative offices for his comments, including the German Institute Taipei and the Israel Economic and Cultural Office in Taipei, Chu did not correct his mistake. Instead, he doubled down, accusing foreign governments of “interfering in the internal affairs of other countries.”
His response is all too familiar — it is identical to the catch-all phrase the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has used for years to deflect international criticisms of its human rights abuses, military harassment of Taiwan and disruption of the international order. As the chairman of the main opposition party in Taiwan’s democratic system, Chu’s remarks reveal critical errors in his understanding of three things — his political role, history and the international context.
Chu seems to have forgotten that the KMT is an opposition party — it does not hold state power, nor is it the leader of Taiwan’s “internal affairs.” The responses to his comments from foreign representative offices were meant to correct his egregiously inappropriate comparison, not to interfere with domestic politics. Such international interactions are normal in a democratic society, and are a fundamental part of upholding historical memory, human rights and dignity. In reality, accusing others of “interfering in internal affairs” is both an overstep of Chu’s political role and a shirking of political responsibility.
Equating a democratic leader like Lai with Hitler is not only absurd, but also rubs salt on the historical wounds of Europe and the Jewish community. The genocide and countless wartime atrocities committed by the Nazi regime are a memory shared by all of humanity, and represent some of the most painful chapters in the histories of Germany and Israel — they should not be invoked so casually.
By completely ignoring these international sentiments and equating Taiwan’s democracy with authoritarian regimes, Chu has severely damaged Taiwan’s image and infringed upon fundamental diplomatic and humanitarian norms.
The phrase “do not interfere in internal affairs” is the CCP’s standard response to international criticism, specifically when justifying its continued harassment of Taiwan, oppression of Xinjiang and Tibet, and suppression of Hong Kong. For Chu to echo the CCP’s rhetoric raises serious doubts about his values and position, and suggests an alignment with the Beijing’s overall narrative.
Last month, KMT supporter Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑) — suspected of using forged signatures on a recall petition against DPP Legislator Lee Kuen-cheng (李坤城) — arrived at the New Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office for questioning wearing a red armband bearing a swastika, carrying a copy of Hitler’s Mein Kampf and giving a Nazi salute. Despite the public outcry, Chu failed to condemn Sung’s actions. Now, he has exacerbated the issue and attracted an even stronger international backlash. Chu’s actions have demonstrated that he lacks the wisdom expected of a leader and the moral courage required to admit one’s own mistakes.
Telling foreign countries not to “interfere in internal affairs” is a weak excuse to avoid taking responsibility for failed party leadership. Even in a democracy, free speech is not a shield for arbitrarily spreading falsehoods, and parroting authoritarian rhetoric does not deflect legitimate external criticism.
Elliot Yao is a reviewer.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Father’s Day, as celebrated around the world, has its roots in the early 20th century US. In 1910, the state of Washington marked the world’s first official Father’s Day. Later, in 1972, then-US president Richard Nixon signed a proclamation establishing the third Sunday of June as a national holiday honoring fathers. Many countries have since followed suit, adopting the same date. In Taiwan, the celebration takes a different form — both in timing and meaning. Taiwan’s Father’s Day falls on Aug. 8, a date chosen not for historical events, but for the beauty of language. In Mandarin, “eight eight” is pronounced
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
In a recent essay, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” a former adviser to US President Donald Trump, Christian Whiton, accuses Taiwan of diplomatic incompetence — claiming Taipei failed to reach out to Trump, botched trade negotiations and mishandled its defense posture. Whiton’s narrative overlooks a fundamental truth: Taiwan was never in a position to “win” Trump’s favor in the first place. The playing field was asymmetrical from the outset, dominated by a transactional US president on one side and the looming threat of Chinese coercion on the other. From the outset of his second term, which began in January, Trump reaffirmed his
RSS