From May to November last year, the Health Promotion Administration commissioned the non-profit Consumers’ Foundation to operate “undercover observations” of 854 vendors across the nation’s 22 administrative regions.
They found that 26.9 percent of vendors did not ask customers to verify their age when buying tobacco products.
Of those observed, betel nut stalls were the most egregious violators of the Tobacco Hazards Prevention Act (菸害防制法), with close to 40 percent of those observed not asking for identification.
More than 20 percent of chain convenience store respondents also contravened the law.
When asked what the legal age to use tobacco is, many people might respond doubtfully, asking: “Is it 18 years old?”
I am responsible for tobacco control on a university campus and I often point students, parents and people in neighboring communities off campus in the direction of the latest amendment to the act, which came into effect on March 22, 2023.
Despite the revisions being in place for two years, many remain unaware that smoking is not allowed on university campuses, that the legal age for smoking is 20 years old, and that vaping and electronic cigarettes are banned. Some even disbelievingly retorted: “When did the law change?”
Amendments to the act have been in effect for two years at this point, and there are still many who remain unclear on the letter of the law, including Article 16, which states that “persons under the age of 20 and pregnant women shall not smoke,” in particular.
The ministry ought to use the media to bolster its nonsmoking messaging and tack on penalties for retailers, convenience stores and betel nut stands through sting operations.
If vendors contravene the law, then the government should hit the responsible parties with fines of NT$10,000 to NT$250,000.
When we can prevent vendors from pretending that they were unaware and would do better next time when they “unwittingly” sell tobacco and betel nut products to minors, then we would have achieved our public awareness goal to decrease access.
Chen Hung-hui is a military instructor and university life resource officer.
Translated by Tim Smith
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS