The Presidential Office on Tuesday thanked the US House of Representatives for passing two Taiwan-related bills. One of them, the Taiwan International Solidarity Act, clarifies that UN Resolution 2758 does not address the representation of Taiwan or its people in the UN or related organizations. UN Resolution 2758 has become something of a watchword for Chinese Communist Party (CCP) disinformation on Taiwan.
The CCP’s messaging is centralized, coordinated and organized, with the goal of shaping a narrative that was determined long ago and which is designed to benefit China’s national interests and the CCP’s distortion of reality.
This disinformation and narrative-formation is conducted at all levels, from international organizations such as the UN to communities in state-enforced misinformation bubbles under the CCP’s authoritarian rule — such as in Tibet and Xinjiang — to Taiwan, which is subject to constant and overwhelming distortions, lies and omissions perpetrated by pro-Chinese figures or social media influencers on the CCP’s payroll. To counter these, independent, reliable non-agenda driven journalism is key.
Up until now, local communities have relied on news provided by services including Voice of America (VOA), Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and Radio Free Asia (RFA).
The Taipei Times has published op-ed articles outlining how much the Tibetan community, within Tibet and overseas, has relied on reporting by VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan. Former RFA Dharamshala bureau chief Yeshi Dawa wrote (“VOA, RFA vital in countering China,” April 23, page 8) how the VOA and the RFA were strong countermeasures to China’s lies, quoting American political scientist John Arquilla, who said that “in today’s global information age, victory may sometimes depend not on whose army wins, but on whose story wins.”
Former member of the Tibetan parliament in exile Khedroob Thondup wrote (“VOA closure a setback for Tibetans,” March 24, page 8) that many in the Tibetan diaspora rely on the VOA and the RFA to stay connected to the struggles of their compatriots in Tibet.
In March, US President Donald Trump signed an executive order reducing the operations of the RFA’s parent agency, the US Agency for Global Media, to the legal minimum as part of cost-cutting efforts.
A press release on Friday last week announced that by the end of this month RFA Tibetan and RFA Uyghur, among other local RFA services, would no longer publish new content, and that the Asia Fact Check Lab, which focuses on the false narratives seeded by the CCP, would cease operations.
It would appear that the CCP has been handed a win, to continue spreading its lies unchecked.
The Trump administration, in Europe militarily and in the information space, is essentially saying that the US has been providing protection and funding news services for decades, and would no longer do so.
In the absence of these services, perhaps it is time for other countries to step up to the plate, just as Europe is now preparing to take more responsibility for its own military defense.
The government could express gratitude to the US House of Representatives for passing legislation to counter the CCP’s false narratives in the UN, but Taiwan could do so much more to push back on other levels. This could include encouraging the production of reporting countering the CCP’s pervasive agenda-driven distortions.
On Sunday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote (“RFA off-air: crisis and opportunity,” May 4, page 8) that “the fall of RFA and the VOA should be seen not just as a tragedy, but as an opportunity,” and that the government should support independent, non-state agenda driven journalism by creating the right ecosystem and offering tax incentives, but not controlling the content.
The government must do all it can to encourage and spearhead the push back against the CCP’s distortions.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS