The US and its allies should treat the Taiwan Strait as part of the Pacific theater of operations to help counter threats from China, a military affairs researcher said on Sunday last week. Institute for National Defense and Security Research military expert Shen Ming-shih (沈明室) said he made the assessment in response to Japanese researchers’ comments following recent Chinese military drills.
Japan Institute for National Fundamentals researcher Maki Nakagawa said that the drills differed from earlier ones in that they involved Chinese fishers as a maritime militia. The exercises simulated a blockade of critical marine corridors and attacks on Taiwan’s critical infrastructure.
There is also the possibility China could take control of the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台) with drones and militia in the event of a Taiwan-China conflict, Nakagawa said, although Shen told the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) that it would be unlikely to attempt such a move in the short term, as it would go against Beijing’s hopes to sow division between Japan and the US.
However, “Japan would be dealt a major blow if the islands were occupied by China,” he said.
Officials in Japan and the US are well aware that the annexation of Taiwan would be detrimental to their own national interests, and suggestions that Japanese islands might also become targets of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) have been made before.
China has been waging a disinformation campaign targeting Okinawa for the past several years. In March, The Diplomat reported that China might even target the prefecture for annexation by citing false claims that it was once Chinese territory.
Even if China’s ambitions went no further than the Diaoyutais, its occupation of the islands would project its naval power significantly closer to Okinawa and boost its capability to impose a blockade in the Bashi Channel or the Miyako Strait. Moreover, US forces in Okinawa would face a significantly greater threat.
Following Shen’s suggestion, the US and Japan could bolster coordination with Taiwanese forces to protect their own regional interests. Given shared claims over the Diaoyutais, Taiwan and Japan should put aside their differences and cooperate on the defense of the archipelago through joint patrols and coast guard deployments. The two sides could build shared facilities on the archipelago’s main island, from which they could jointly monitor Chinese drills in the vicinity.
A key focus of joint efforts between the three countries should be the deterrence of Chinese blockades of the Bashi Channel, the Miyako Strait, and the waters between Japan’s Yonaguni Island and Taiwan. Ensuring that the passageways remain unobstructed, and that submarine communication cables that traverse them remain secure and undamaged, is crucial to the integrity of the first island chain.
Japan’s Yomiuri Shimbun on Jan. 30 last year reported that China constantly has four warships deployed around Taiwan, which would likely play a role in access denial efforts in the event of a conflict.
Over the past year, China has allegedly used cargo vessels to damage submarine cables connecting Taiwan. On April 21, Chinese-language media reported that a Chinese cruise ship had sailed within 2 nautical miles (3.7km) of Pingtung County’s Hengchun Peninsula (恆春半島).
To protect against all such threats, Taiwan must closely monitor Chinese-operated vessels — commercial, civilian and military — that come close to its shores. Taipei could enlist the help of Japan and the US in the task.
Taiwan, the US and Japan must send China a clear message that harassment will not be tolerated.
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
The stocks of rare earth companies soared on Monday following news that the Trump administration had taken a 10 percent stake in Oklahoma mining and magnet company USA Rare Earth Inc. Such is the visible benefit enjoyed by the growing number of firms that count Uncle Sam as a shareholder. Yet recent events surrounding perhaps what is the most well-known state-picked champion, Intel Corp, exposed a major unseen cost of the federal government’s unprecedented intervention in private business: the distortion of capital markets that have underpinned US growth and innovation since its founding. Prior to Intel’s Jan. 22 call with analysts
RSS