On ‘diplomatic allies’
On April 11, South Korea announced the establishment of diplomatic relations with Syria. With this move, it now has ties with every UN member state except North Korea — its enemy in the still-unresolved Korean War. Does this mean South Korea now has 191 “diplomatic allies,” most of which also maintain ties with North Korea?
This illustrates the absurdity of the term “diplomatic ally” that is so commonly used in Taiwan to describe states that recognize the Republic of China (“Taiwan is in need of real allies,” April 26, page 8).
The framing behind the term is not about recognizing Taiwan itself as a sovereign state. Rather, it reflects the narrative of the Chinese Civil War: Within the concept of “one China,” the question is which government — Taipei or Beijing — is recognized as legitimate. In other words, it is a trap.
Although we must discard this problematic term, Taiwan should not dismiss any country, however poor or small, as insignificant in diplomatic relations. Otherwise, we would descend into the indignity where “the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must.”
If we take the cornerstones of the rules-based international order and multilateral diplomacy seriously, we should “act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood” (Article 1, Universal Declaration of Human Rights) and “respect ... the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples” (Article 1, UN Charter).
Or just remember the golden rule: “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.”
Te Khai-su
Helsinki, Finland
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
RSS