On ‘diplomatic allies’
On April 11, South Korea announced the establishment of diplomatic relations with Syria. With this move, it now has ties with every UN member state except North Korea — its enemy in the still-unresolved Korean War. Does this mean South Korea now has 191 “diplomatic allies,” most of which also maintain ties with North Korea?
This illustrates the absurdity of the term “diplomatic ally” that is so commonly used in Taiwan to describe states that recognize the Republic of China (“Taiwan is in need of real allies,” April 26, page 8).
The framing behind the term is not about recognizing Taiwan itself as a sovereign state. Rather, it reflects the narrative of the Chinese Civil War: Within the concept of “one China,” the question is which government — Taipei or Beijing — is recognized as legitimate. In other words, it is a trap.
Although we must discard this problematic term, Taiwan should not dismiss any country, however poor or small, as insignificant in diplomatic relations. Otherwise, we would descend into the indignity where “the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must.”
If we take the cornerstones of the rules-based international order and multilateral diplomacy seriously, we should “act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood” (Article 1, Universal Declaration of Human Rights) and “respect ... the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples” (Article 1, UN Charter).
Or just remember the golden rule: “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.”
Te Khai-su
Helsinki, Finland
After more than a year of review, the National Security Bureau on Monday said it has completed a sweeping declassification of political archives from the Martial Law period, transferring the full collection to the National Archives Administration under the National Development Council. The move marks another significant step in Taiwan’s long journey toward transitional justice. The newly opened files span the architecture of authoritarian control: internal security and loyalty investigations, intelligence and counterintelligence operations, exit and entry controls, overseas surveillance of Taiwan independence activists, and case materials related to sedition and rebellion charges. For academics of Taiwan’s White Terror era —
On Feb. 7, the New York Times ran a column by Nicholas Kristof (“What if the valedictorians were America’s cool kids?”) that blindly and lavishly praised education in Taiwan and in Asia more broadly. We are used to this kind of Orientalist admiration for what is, at the end of the day, paradoxically very Anglo-centered. They could have praised Europeans for valuing education, too, but one rarely sees an American praising Europe, right? It immediately made me think of something I have observed. If Taiwanese education looks so wonderful through the eyes of the archetypal expat, gazing from an ivory tower, how
China has apparently emerged as one of the clearest and most predictable beneficiaries of US President Donald Trump’s “America First” and “Make America Great Again” approach. Many countries are scrambling to defend their interests and reputation regarding an increasingly unpredictable and self-seeking US. There is a growing consensus among foreign policy pundits that the world has already entered the beginning of the end of Pax Americana, the US-led international order. Consequently, a number of countries are reversing their foreign policy preferences. The result has been an accelerating turn toward China as an alternative economic partner, with Beijing hosting Western leaders, albeit
After 37 US lawmakers wrote to express concern over legislators’ stalling of critical budgets, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) pledged to make the Executive Yuan’s proposed NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.7 billion) special defense budget a top priority for legislative review. On Tuesday, it was finally listed on the legislator’s plenary agenda for Friday next week. The special defense budget was proposed by President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration in November last year to enhance the nation’s defense capabilities against external threats from China. However, the legislature, dominated by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), repeatedly blocked its review. The
RSS