On ‘diplomatic allies’
On April 11, South Korea announced the establishment of diplomatic relations with Syria. With this move, it now has ties with every UN member state except North Korea — its enemy in the still-unresolved Korean War. Does this mean South Korea now has 191 “diplomatic allies,” most of which also maintain ties with North Korea?
This illustrates the absurdity of the term “diplomatic ally” that is so commonly used in Taiwan to describe states that recognize the Republic of China (“Taiwan is in need of real allies,” April 26, page 8).
The framing behind the term is not about recognizing Taiwan itself as a sovereign state. Rather, it reflects the narrative of the Chinese Civil War: Within the concept of “one China,” the question is which government — Taipei or Beijing — is recognized as legitimate. In other words, it is a trap.
Although we must discard this problematic term, Taiwan should not dismiss any country, however poor or small, as insignificant in diplomatic relations. Otherwise, we would descend into the indignity where “the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must.”
If we take the cornerstones of the rules-based international order and multilateral diplomacy seriously, we should “act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood” (Article 1, Universal Declaration of Human Rights) and “respect ... the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples” (Article 1, UN Charter).
Or just remember the golden rule: “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.”
Te Khai-su
Helsinki, Finland
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
After thousands of Taiwanese fans poured into the Tokyo Dome to cheer for Taiwan’s national team in the World Baseball Classic’s (WBC) Pool C games, an image of food and drink waste left at the stadium said to have been left by Taiwanese fans began spreading on social media. The image sparked wide debate, only later to be revealed as an artificially generated image. The image caption claimed that “Taiwanese left trash everywhere after watching the game in Tokyo Dome,” and said that one of the “three bad habits” of Taiwanese is littering. However, a reporter from a Japanese media outlet
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
RSS