Pope Francis devoted himself to reform in the Catholic Church over the past 12 years, although he differed from his two more overtly anti-communist predecessors. He believed that we should build bridges instead of high walls and that lack of communication leads to misunderstandings. With this mindset, he signed the Provisional Agreement on the Appointment of Bishops with China.
October last year marked the signing of the agreement’s third extension in the past six years with the current extension originally set at four years. Pope Francis was concerned for the Chinese Catholic community, who have long been suppressed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its Chinese Catholic Patriotic Association. He was willing to make some minute concessions on the appointment of bishops in exchange for greater freedom for the church’s ecclesiastic operations within China.
In November last year, Vatican Secretary for Relations with States Paul Richard Gallagher traveled to Poland, where he gave a speech regarding the Holy See’s diplomacy. Gallagher emphasized that this agreement was an important means of conducting foreign diplomacy with China. Through it, the church could protect its doctrine and the Catholic community in China and avoid CCP interference in ecclesiastic affairs.
Francis had hoped adherents in the Catholic Church in China could be free to come out of hiding to worship on their own terms; Rome’s position has always incorporated humaneness, peace and a shepherding spirit, in effect, the protection of the faithful in China from CCP suppression. Despite the multiple occasions on which Beijing has gone back on its word, such instances could not extinguish the late pope’s dream of pastoral care within China.
Pastoral care is born out of philanthropy and boundless love for humanity, but placing parishioners from Taiwan’s diocese together with those in China could lead to the relocation of the Vatican’s embassy in Taiwan to China due to improved relations between the Holy See and Beijing. This is a matter those in Taiwan’s diocese have great concerns about.
China has expressed that it would benefit from a Chinese direction in a “post-Francis era,” following the conclusion of the present extension. However, more conservative-leaning factions within the Holy See are not likely to accept “Vietnam model” bishops — based on the CCP misinterpretation of a papal arrangement with Vietnam: an arrangement where bishops are supposedly pre-selected for ordination by the CCP with subsequent Vatican approval. Many in church leadership hold firmly to the Vatican’s primacy in such matters.
During his tenure, Francis consecrated the ordination of more than 10 Chinese bishops. He also ordered the bishop of the diocese of Hong Kong to visit Beijing after close to 30 years of minimal contact, promoting the bishop of Hong Kong Stephen Chow (周守仁) to the rank of cardinal, clearly with the intention of using the Hong Kong diocese under Chinese rule as a bridge between the Vatican and Beijing. Vatican professor of geopolitics Pietro Schiavazzi described Pope Francis’ decision as the church’s greatest ever realignment of power between cities, countries and continents, allowing for a more equitable rebalancing of power among the 120 voting cardinals in the imminent conclave, primarily as the proportion of Asian cardinals in the College of Cardinals greatly expands. Cardinals from Europe and the Americas no longer hold a majority in the college.
Helping the number of Asia’s Catholics to grow and integrating Catholic teachings into China in particular would be a major historic event and would be the mission of all future popes. Apart from Taipei bolstering relations with the Holy See, the relationship especially requires cultivating many more supportive senior clergy, but from another angle, Taiwan’s ties also depend on whether the CCP relaxes its “sinicization of the Vatican,” and whether the power to appoint bishops continues to be mutually enjoyed through a system in which China reaps benefits while the Vatican maintains face.
This is a thorny issue that the CCP would have to overcome.
When the conclave starts, the majority of the cardinals favored to become the next pope would continue to follow Francis’ path and support Taiwan. From Taiwan’s perspective, hopefully their backgrounds or the reasoning behind their desire for reform does not outweigh the patience and love for those in lands that the late pope was willing to stand up for.
Chang Meng-jen is chair of Fu Jen Catholic University’s Department of Italian Language and Culture, and coordinator of the university’s diplomacy and international affairs program.
Translated by Tim Smith
In a stark reminder of China’s persistent territorial overreach, Pema Wangjom Thongdok, a woman from Arunachal Pradesh holding an Indian passport, was detained for 18 hours at Shanghai Pudong Airport on Nov. 24 last year. Chinese immigration officials allegedly informed her that her passport was “invalid” because she was “Chinese,” refusing to recognize her Indian citizenship and claiming Arunachal Pradesh as part of South Tibet. Officials had insisted that Thongdok, an Indian-origin UK resident traveling for a conference, was not Indian despite her valid documents. India lodged a strong diplomatic protest, summoning the Chinese charge d’affaires in Delhi and demanding
In the past 72 hours, US Senators Roger Wicker, Dan Sullivan and Ruben Gallego took to social media to publicly rebuke the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) over the defense budget. I understand that Taiwan’s head is on the chopping block, and the urgency of its security situation cannot be overstated. However, the comments from Wicker, Sullivan and Gallego suggest they have fallen victim to a sophisticated disinformation campaign orchestrated by an administration in Taipei that treats national security as a partisan weapon. The narrative fed to our allies claims the opposition is slashing the defense budget to kowtow to the Chinese
Immediately after the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Justice Mission” exercise at the end of last year, a question was posed to Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal regarding recent developments involving the exercises around Taiwan, and how he viewed their impact on regional peace and stability. His answer was somewhat perplexing to me as a curious student of Taiwanese affairs. “India closely follows developments across the Indo-Pacific region,” he said, adding: “We have an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our significant trade, economic, people-to-people, and maritime interests. We urge all concerned
In a Taipei Times editorial published almost three years ago (“Macron goes off-piste,” April 13, 2023, page 8), French President Emmanuel Macron was criticized for comments he made immediately after meeting Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing. Macron had spoken of the need for his country to find a path on Chinese foreign policy no longer aligned with that of the US, saying that continuing to follow the US agenda would sacrifice the EU’s strategic autonomy. At the time, Macron was criticized for gifting Xi a PR coup, and the editorial said that he had been “persuaded to run
RSS