Pope Francis devoted himself to reform in the Catholic Church over the past 12 years, although he differed from his two more overtly anti-communist predecessors. He believed that we should build bridges instead of high walls and that lack of communication leads to misunderstandings. With this mindset, he signed the Provisional Agreement on the Appointment of Bishops with China.
October last year marked the signing of the agreement’s third extension in the past six years with the current extension originally set at four years. Pope Francis was concerned for the Chinese Catholic community, who have long been suppressed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its Chinese Catholic Patriotic Association. He was willing to make some minute concessions on the appointment of bishops in exchange for greater freedom for the church’s ecclesiastic operations within China.
In November last year, Vatican Secretary for Relations with States Paul Richard Gallagher traveled to Poland, where he gave a speech regarding the Holy See’s diplomacy. Gallagher emphasized that this agreement was an important means of conducting foreign diplomacy with China. Through it, the church could protect its doctrine and the Catholic community in China and avoid CCP interference in ecclesiastic affairs.
Francis had hoped adherents in the Catholic Church in China could be free to come out of hiding to worship on their own terms; Rome’s position has always incorporated humaneness, peace and a shepherding spirit, in effect, the protection of the faithful in China from CCP suppression. Despite the multiple occasions on which Beijing has gone back on its word, such instances could not extinguish the late pope’s dream of pastoral care within China.
Pastoral care is born out of philanthropy and boundless love for humanity, but placing parishioners from Taiwan’s diocese together with those in China could lead to the relocation of the Vatican’s embassy in Taiwan to China due to improved relations between the Holy See and Beijing. This is a matter those in Taiwan’s diocese have great concerns about.
China has expressed that it would benefit from a Chinese direction in a “post-Francis era,” following the conclusion of the present extension. However, more conservative-leaning factions within the Holy See are not likely to accept “Vietnam model” bishops — based on the CCP misinterpretation of a papal arrangement with Vietnam: an arrangement where bishops are supposedly pre-selected for ordination by the CCP with subsequent Vatican approval. Many in church leadership hold firmly to the Vatican’s primacy in such matters.
During his tenure, Francis consecrated the ordination of more than 10 Chinese bishops. He also ordered the bishop of the diocese of Hong Kong to visit Beijing after close to 30 years of minimal contact, promoting the bishop of Hong Kong Stephen Chow (周守仁) to the rank of cardinal, clearly with the intention of using the Hong Kong diocese under Chinese rule as a bridge between the Vatican and Beijing. Vatican professor of geopolitics Pietro Schiavazzi described Pope Francis’ decision as the church’s greatest ever realignment of power between cities, countries and continents, allowing for a more equitable rebalancing of power among the 120 voting cardinals in the imminent conclave, primarily as the proportion of Asian cardinals in the College of Cardinals greatly expands. Cardinals from Europe and the Americas no longer hold a majority in the college.
Helping the number of Asia’s Catholics to grow and integrating Catholic teachings into China in particular would be a major historic event and would be the mission of all future popes. Apart from Taipei bolstering relations with the Holy See, the relationship especially requires cultivating many more supportive senior clergy, but from another angle, Taiwan’s ties also depend on whether the CCP relaxes its “sinicization of the Vatican,” and whether the power to appoint bishops continues to be mutually enjoyed through a system in which China reaps benefits while the Vatican maintains face.
This is a thorny issue that the CCP would have to overcome.
When the conclave starts, the majority of the cardinals favored to become the next pope would continue to follow Francis’ path and support Taiwan. From Taiwan’s perspective, hopefully their backgrounds or the reasoning behind their desire for reform does not outweigh the patience and love for those in lands that the late pope was willing to stand up for.
Chang Meng-jen is chair of Fu Jen Catholic University’s Department of Italian Language and Culture, and coordinator of the university’s diplomacy and international affairs program.
Translated by Tim Smith
After more than a year of review, the National Security Bureau on Monday said it has completed a sweeping declassification of political archives from the Martial Law period, transferring the full collection to the National Archives Administration under the National Development Council. The move marks another significant step in Taiwan’s long journey toward transitional justice. The newly opened files span the architecture of authoritarian control: internal security and loyalty investigations, intelligence and counterintelligence operations, exit and entry controls, overseas surveillance of Taiwan independence activists, and case materials related to sedition and rebellion charges. For academics of Taiwan’s White Terror era —
On Feb. 7, the New York Times ran a column by Nicholas Kristof (“What if the valedictorians were America’s cool kids?”) that blindly and lavishly praised education in Taiwan and in Asia more broadly. We are used to this kind of Orientalist admiration for what is, at the end of the day, paradoxically very Anglo-centered. They could have praised Europeans for valuing education, too, but one rarely sees an American praising Europe, right? It immediately made me think of something I have observed. If Taiwanese education looks so wonderful through the eyes of the archetypal expat, gazing from an ivory tower, how
China has apparently emerged as one of the clearest and most predictable beneficiaries of US President Donald Trump’s “America First” and “Make America Great Again” approach. Many countries are scrambling to defend their interests and reputation regarding an increasingly unpredictable and self-seeking US. There is a growing consensus among foreign policy pundits that the world has already entered the beginning of the end of Pax Americana, the US-led international order. Consequently, a number of countries are reversing their foreign policy preferences. The result has been an accelerating turn toward China as an alternative economic partner, with Beijing hosting Western leaders, albeit
After 37 US lawmakers wrote to express concern over legislators’ stalling of critical budgets, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) pledged to make the Executive Yuan’s proposed NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.7 billion) special defense budget a top priority for legislative review. On Tuesday, it was finally listed on the legislator’s plenary agenda for Friday next week. The special defense budget was proposed by President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration in November last year to enhance the nation’s defense capabilities against external threats from China. However, the legislature, dominated by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), repeatedly blocked its review. The
RSS