Pope Francis devoted himself to reform in the Catholic Church over the past 12 years, although he differed from his two more overtly anti-communist predecessors. He believed that we should build bridges instead of high walls and that lack of communication leads to misunderstandings. With this mindset, he signed the Provisional Agreement on the Appointment of Bishops with China.
October last year marked the signing of the agreement’s third extension in the past six years with the current extension originally set at four years. Pope Francis was concerned for the Chinese Catholic community, who have long been suppressed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its Chinese Catholic Patriotic Association. He was willing to make some minute concessions on the appointment of bishops in exchange for greater freedom for the church’s ecclesiastic operations within China.
In November last year, Vatican Secretary for Relations with States Paul Richard Gallagher traveled to Poland, where he gave a speech regarding the Holy See’s diplomacy. Gallagher emphasized that this agreement was an important means of conducting foreign diplomacy with China. Through it, the church could protect its doctrine and the Catholic community in China and avoid CCP interference in ecclesiastic affairs.
Francis had hoped adherents in the Catholic Church in China could be free to come out of hiding to worship on their own terms; Rome’s position has always incorporated humaneness, peace and a shepherding spirit, in effect, the protection of the faithful in China from CCP suppression. Despite the multiple occasions on which Beijing has gone back on its word, such instances could not extinguish the late pope’s dream of pastoral care within China.
Pastoral care is born out of philanthropy and boundless love for humanity, but placing parishioners from Taiwan’s diocese together with those in China could lead to the relocation of the Vatican’s embassy in Taiwan to China due to improved relations between the Holy See and Beijing. This is a matter those in Taiwan’s diocese have great concerns about.
China has expressed that it would benefit from a Chinese direction in a “post-Francis era,” following the conclusion of the present extension. However, more conservative-leaning factions within the Holy See are not likely to accept “Vietnam model” bishops — based on the CCP misinterpretation of a papal arrangement with Vietnam: an arrangement where bishops are supposedly pre-selected for ordination by the CCP with subsequent Vatican approval. Many in church leadership hold firmly to the Vatican’s primacy in such matters.
During his tenure, Francis consecrated the ordination of more than 10 Chinese bishops. He also ordered the bishop of the diocese of Hong Kong to visit Beijing after close to 30 years of minimal contact, promoting the bishop of Hong Kong Stephen Chow (周守仁) to the rank of cardinal, clearly with the intention of using the Hong Kong diocese under Chinese rule as a bridge between the Vatican and Beijing. Vatican professor of geopolitics Pietro Schiavazzi described Pope Francis’ decision as the church’s greatest ever realignment of power between cities, countries and continents, allowing for a more equitable rebalancing of power among the 120 voting cardinals in the imminent conclave, primarily as the proportion of Asian cardinals in the College of Cardinals greatly expands. Cardinals from Europe and the Americas no longer hold a majority in the college.
Helping the number of Asia’s Catholics to grow and integrating Catholic teachings into China in particular would be a major historic event and would be the mission of all future popes. Apart from Taipei bolstering relations with the Holy See, the relationship especially requires cultivating many more supportive senior clergy, but from another angle, Taiwan’s ties also depend on whether the CCP relaxes its “sinicization of the Vatican,” and whether the power to appoint bishops continues to be mutually enjoyed through a system in which China reaps benefits while the Vatican maintains face.
This is a thorny issue that the CCP would have to overcome.
When the conclave starts, the majority of the cardinals favored to become the next pope would continue to follow Francis’ path and support Taiwan. From Taiwan’s perspective, hopefully their backgrounds or the reasoning behind their desire for reform does not outweigh the patience and love for those in lands that the late pope was willing to stand up for.
Chang Meng-jen is chair of Fu Jen Catholic University’s Department of Italian Language and Culture, and coordinator of the university’s diplomacy and international affairs program.
Translated by Tim Smith
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS