The government is open to discussions about absentee voting in national elections and referendums, but not voting from overseas, Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told a plenary session at the legislature in Taipei on Tuesday. Cho expressed concern that allowing voting from overseas would expose elections to “the potential for manipulation by hostile regimes.”
Cho’s concerns are not new. Then-premier Chen Chien-jen (陳建仁) and then-minister of the interior Lin Yu-chang (林右昌) on March 14 last year said that while the government could consider absentee voting within Taiwan for referendums, the measure could not be applied to overseas voting, or even for presidential elections.
For absentee voting to become a reality, election security would need to be improved, and planning and research would be required to ensure that votes are kept confidential and election results are accurate and fair, Chen said.
It would not be suitable for regular elections, but could be used for referendums, Lin said.
Concerns about election fraud and manipulation among top officials are understandable, given the threat posed by China, but there might be a way to safely allow absentee voting from Taiwan’s representative offices overseas.
At the very least, allowing Taiwanese to cast their ballots from anywhere within the country is a measure that is long overdue. The number of Taiwanese who migrate to the country’s large municipalities from towns and rural areas is significant. Requiring them to travel during elections often excludes people from the voting process, as many are unable to take leave from work or cannot afford to travel.
Cho said that domestic transfer voting — absentee voting from a location in Taiwan that is not for the voter’s registered address — could initially be tested in referendums on specific issues, but allowing it for elections for public office would be significantly more complex and face “great difficulties.”
However, Cho did not explain how something as simple as accepting a voter’s ballot from a different location within Taiwan could be so difficult.
Central Election Commission (CEC) Chairman Lee Chin-yung (李進勇) told lawmakers that the executive branch had been reviewing absentee voting for some time, but said that it would be “extremely serious” if any policy affected the stability of electoral work. Lee also did not explain how absentee voting could be destabilizing.
Perhaps their concerns are similar to those expressed by CTBC Business School Department of Business and Economic Law researcher Hsu Hui-feng (許惠峰), who in an editorial (“Absentee ballot’s cons outweigh its benefits,” March 21, 2024, page 8) outlined three problems that would likely challenge the introduction of absentee voting:
He said that the CEC would be unable to verify voter identities in a mail-in system, while vote buying remains a problem; there would be uncertainty over whether the CEC would safely receive mail-in votes; and the secrecy of ballots cast remotely could not be guaranteed.
However, mail-in voting is unnecessary. There are polling across the country, so people not in their electoral district could simply go to the nearest polling station.
Even overseas voting could be handled without a mail system. Despite Taiwan having formal diplomatic relations with only 12 countries, it has representative offices in another 60. They could provide secure polling stations and, as they have secure links with Taiwan, ballots could be mailed to the CEC without concern.
Although overseas voting is unlikely in the near future, absentee voting within Taiwan — including in presidential elections — is feasible and should be seriously considered to better protect the rights of voters.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS