The government is open to discussions about absentee voting in national elections and referendums, but not voting from overseas, Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told a plenary session at the legislature in Taipei on Tuesday. Cho expressed concern that allowing voting from overseas would expose elections to “the potential for manipulation by hostile regimes.”
Cho’s concerns are not new. Then-premier Chen Chien-jen (陳建仁) and then-minister of the interior Lin Yu-chang (林右昌) on March 14 last year said that while the government could consider absentee voting within Taiwan for referendums, the measure could not be applied to overseas voting, or even for presidential elections.
For absentee voting to become a reality, election security would need to be improved, and planning and research would be required to ensure that votes are kept confidential and election results are accurate and fair, Chen said.
It would not be suitable for regular elections, but could be used for referendums, Lin said.
Concerns about election fraud and manipulation among top officials are understandable, given the threat posed by China, but there might be a way to safely allow absentee voting from Taiwan’s representative offices overseas.
At the very least, allowing Taiwanese to cast their ballots from anywhere within the country is a measure that is long overdue. The number of Taiwanese who migrate to the country’s large municipalities from towns and rural areas is significant. Requiring them to travel during elections often excludes people from the voting process, as many are unable to take leave from work or cannot afford to travel.
Cho said that domestic transfer voting — absentee voting from a location in Taiwan that is not for the voter’s registered address — could initially be tested in referendums on specific issues, but allowing it for elections for public office would be significantly more complex and face “great difficulties.”
However, Cho did not explain how something as simple as accepting a voter’s ballot from a different location within Taiwan could be so difficult.
Central Election Commission (CEC) Chairman Lee Chin-yung (李進勇) told lawmakers that the executive branch had been reviewing absentee voting for some time, but said that it would be “extremely serious” if any policy affected the stability of electoral work. Lee also did not explain how absentee voting could be destabilizing.
Perhaps their concerns are similar to those expressed by CTBC Business School Department of Business and Economic Law researcher Hsu Hui-feng (許惠峰), who in an editorial (“Absentee ballot’s cons outweigh its benefits,” March 21, 2024, page 8) outlined three problems that would likely challenge the introduction of absentee voting:
He said that the CEC would be unable to verify voter identities in a mail-in system, while vote buying remains a problem; there would be uncertainty over whether the CEC would safely receive mail-in votes; and the secrecy of ballots cast remotely could not be guaranteed.
However, mail-in voting is unnecessary. There are polling across the country, so people not in their electoral district could simply go to the nearest polling station.
Even overseas voting could be handled without a mail system. Despite Taiwan having formal diplomatic relations with only 12 countries, it has representative offices in another 60. They could provide secure polling stations and, as they have secure links with Taiwan, ballots could be mailed to the CEC without concern.
Although overseas voting is unlikely in the near future, absentee voting within Taiwan — including in presidential elections — is feasible and should be seriously considered to better protect the rights of voters.
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing
RSS