The recall wave is showing diametric opposites: Recalls against Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers were launched by civic groups and the majority of them are organized by young people outside a party apparatus. That starkly contrasts with the “activists” in the KMT attempting to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers; the recall organizers are KMT members, most of whom belong to the party’s Youth League. The KMT ought to think clearly about this: Why is it that bonafide civic groups are more than willing to bear the burden of running these campaigns and show moral courage? Why does the KMT need to rely on younger members to halt recalls against it or to run counter-recall campaigns against the DPP?
Why did civic groups stand up in the first place? With KMT caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) leading a group of 16 KMT-affiliated legislators on a trip to Beijing in February last year to meet with high-level Chinese Communist Party (CCP) officials, including Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧), the KMT is beyond absurd. Former National Security Council secretary-general King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) had the foresight to say Fu is like a parasite.
Why do KMT Youth League members need to launch recall campaigns against the DPP? That is because they have to bear the party’s will. Some of them might be laying the groundwork for a run for public office, and that is their first test to prove themselves. Yet their party is in decline and the public can see through their tricks. One young person identifying with the KMT even flirted with the specter of Nazism and received international condemnation.
Civic groups have set up stalls to gather signatures, exercising their public civic rights every step of the way, and the results speak for themselves.
Meanwhile, the KMT’s and its affiliates’ opposition to the recalls resemble retribution. Their forging of signatures and use of deceased party members’ IDs, as well as the astonishing degree of voter dissatisfaction, have led to accusations of doctored documents and contravention of the Personal Data Protection Act (個人資料保護法).
Civic groups are standing up, sweeping away outdated notions of young Taiwanese’s indifference to politics. The youth are a new social force and their participation shows that younger members of the public are shouldering responsibility as the nation’s new main actors. To a certain extent, that is changing Taiwan’s political direction. It not only severely impacts the KMT, but also serves as a warning for the DPP.
The KMT Youth League allegedly submitted recall signature documents that contained signatures of deceased voters and are being prosecuted in accordance with the law, yet they have countered by criticizing the judiciary, saying that the courts are only targeting the KMT. The party’s legislators facing recalls have even hurled abuse at President William Lai (賴清德). Do they realize he has nothing to do with the recalls? Why are they calling him a dictator?
Who else has headed Taiwan as a dictator apart from former leaders Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國)? Are there still any social conditions that would allow for the re-emergence of a dictatorship? The KMT has morphed from a party that detests the CCP into one that panders to it. If the recalls fail, the KMT would feel emboldened to attempt overturning our nation’s executive branch and stifle further recalls against their party. It is seeking chaos by calling for the toppling of the Cabinet and for the president to resign.
Someone ought to tap their heads and see if anyone is home. They are simply shameless.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Tim Smith
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing
RSS