Anyone who embraces the values of democracy and human rights, such as myself, would strongly condemn the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) for its defense of Nazi symbolism and would not help but think that the KMT has never changed its dictatorial nature.
As a legislator in the democratic country of Taiwan, I strongly condemn the KMT for praising the Nazis. That goes against universal and Taiwanese values. As a generation born after the lifting of martial law, democracy and human rights are concepts deeply rooted in our hearts. I completely disagree with the KMT’s actions. That shows that even after becoming an opposition party, the KMT has not changed its nature as a dictatorial party.
On Tuesday evening in New Taipei City, Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), a KMT member leading the campaign to recall a Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislator, openly gave a Nazi salute. Upon arriving at the New Taipei City Prosecutors’ Office for questioning over alleged petition forgery, Sung was wearing an armband bearing the swastika and carrying a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf, and gave the Nazi salute. That move shocked Taiwanese society.
Sung’s behavior was condemned by all sectors of Taiwan, including President William Lai (賴清德). Surprisingly, the initial reaction by KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was not to condemn such action, but to defend Sung’s use of Nazi symbols as a way to protest against the government. Compared with Sung, Chu’s reaction as the head of the second-largest political party in Taiwan was more shocking.
However, for those who are familiar with Taiwan’s politics and history, Chu’s remarks might not come as a surprise. For many years, the KMT has opposed transitional justice. It is opposed to legislation and policies on transitional justice, and refuses to return ill-gotten party assets it acquired during Taiwan’s authoritarian period.
The KMT’s connivance of glorifying the Nazis has become an international incident. The German and Israeli diplomatic missions in Taiwan publicly criticized it.
Although Chu and the KMT later changed their minds and condemned the Nazis, they did not apologize for embracing them.
The values of Taiwanese are freedom, democracy and human rights. The KMT is completely unable to represent today’s society. We must strongly condemn the KMT’s indulgence in Nazi worship.
Wu Pei-yi is a Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS