Anyone who embraces the values of democracy and human rights, such as myself, would strongly condemn the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) for its defense of Nazi symbolism and would not help but think that the KMT has never changed its dictatorial nature.
As a legislator in the democratic country of Taiwan, I strongly condemn the KMT for praising the Nazis. That goes against universal and Taiwanese values. As a generation born after the lifting of martial law, democracy and human rights are concepts deeply rooted in our hearts. I completely disagree with the KMT’s actions. That shows that even after becoming an opposition party, the KMT has not changed its nature as a dictatorial party.
On Tuesday evening in New Taipei City, Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), a KMT member leading the campaign to recall a Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislator, openly gave a Nazi salute. Upon arriving at the New Taipei City Prosecutors’ Office for questioning over alleged petition forgery, Sung was wearing an armband bearing the swastika and carrying a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf, and gave the Nazi salute. That move shocked Taiwanese society.
Sung’s behavior was condemned by all sectors of Taiwan, including President William Lai (賴清德). Surprisingly, the initial reaction by KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was not to condemn such action, but to defend Sung’s use of Nazi symbols as a way to protest against the government. Compared with Sung, Chu’s reaction as the head of the second-largest political party in Taiwan was more shocking.
However, for those who are familiar with Taiwan’s politics and history, Chu’s remarks might not come as a surprise. For many years, the KMT has opposed transitional justice. It is opposed to legislation and policies on transitional justice, and refuses to return ill-gotten party assets it acquired during Taiwan’s authoritarian period.
The KMT’s connivance of glorifying the Nazis has become an international incident. The German and Israeli diplomatic missions in Taiwan publicly criticized it.
Although Chu and the KMT later changed their minds and condemned the Nazis, they did not apologize for embracing them.
The values of Taiwanese are freedom, democracy and human rights. The KMT is completely unable to represent today’s society. We must strongly condemn the KMT’s indulgence in Nazi worship.
Wu Pei-yi is a Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing
RSS