Last week, Ukraine announced that it had captured two Chinese men serving in Russia’s armed forces on the Ukrainian eastern front. That is a bombshell revelation to the international community that once again debunks the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) claim to neutrality since Russia started its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.
Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Lin Jian (林劍) used ambiguous wording in response to Ukrainian authorities’ demands that Beijing clarify its actions. Lin reiterated that China has “always required its citizens to avoid areas of armed conflict.”
His answer does not explain why Chinese would appear in a Russian military unit, nor does it elucidate why Chinese would participate in Russia’s war, who deployed them to Russia and how they were able to join Russia’s military organization.
Experts have determined from interview footage taken of the prisoners that one of the soldiers does not know any foreign languages and could not be a typical foreign mercenary. It is possible that they are acting as “military observers” attempting to accumulate real-world warfare experience and data from Ukrainian battlefields to prepare China for participation in future conflicts.
The incident challenges China’s assertions that it has “never given military assistance to Russia.” Apart from Chinese soldiers, there has long been international evidence that points to China providing Russia with military vehicles, drones, and military-civilian dual-use technologies and products. Today, even Chinese human assets are appearing on the battlefield, and Beijing’s supposed role as a “neutral mediator” is nothing more than domestic theater.
On the one hand, Beijing is covertly supporting Moscow; on the other, it is trying to curry favor with Kyiv, claiming it could help Ukraine rebuild. Ukraine should beware suspicious people bearing gifts. No faith should be put in Beijing’s “peace” offers.
Since Russia launched its invasion in 2022, China has not once condemned Russia for its actions. Instead, it has voted in every major international organization to oppose any sanctions on Russia, and is helping Moscow to avoid sanctions via China-registered, convenience-flagged ghost shipping fleets and product origin washing across the globe. Now proof in the flesh shows that it is helping Russia. If China keeps denying its guilt, it would be a realization of a strategic alliance between Russia and China, and the formation of a new axis.
It would be a fruitless endeavor for Ukraine to keep expecting China to play a peacemaker role in Russia’s war. The CCP’s core nature does not accord with the deeds of a peace-promoter, but is more akin to a tiger whose sights are locked onto unwitting prey. Beijing is just waiting for an opportunity to strike. If one day, Ukraine turned into a jointly administered testing ground for China and Russia, it would set the stage for endless disasters in regional and international security.
Elliot Yao is a reviewer.
Translated by Tim Smith
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) held a news conference to celebrate his party’s success in surviving Saturday’s mass recall vote, shortly after the final results were confirmed. While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would have much preferred a different result, it was not a defeat for the DPP in the same sense that it was a victory for the KMT: Only KMT legislators were facing recalls. That alone should have given Chu cause to reflect, acknowledge any fault, or perhaps even consider apologizing to his party and the nation. However, based on his speech, Chu showed
RSS