In early April 2022, little more than a month after Russia’s military launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Martina Bednarova, an elementary-school teacher in the Czech Republic, started feeding her students with false narratives about world affairs: A war had never broken out in Ukraine, and everything was perfectly fine and peaceful in Ukraine’s capital, Kyiv, she said.
She excused Russia’s ethnic cleansing of Ukrainians and intentionally distorted the facts, saying it was Russian speakers who were being pursued and killed, and the assassinations, arson attacks, skin flayings, immolations and other terrible deeds were perpetrated by Ukrainian soldiers.
Bednarova’s language was in lockstep with the Kremlin’s propaganda.
A student covertly recorded her lesson and once the issue came to light, she was fired for gross misconduct and a criminal investigation was initiated.
Bednarova admitted having made the remarks, but insisted she was merely expressing her personal opinion. In addition to invoking the principle of freedom of speech, her lawyer attempted to portray her as a victim of Russian disinformation and state-sponsored propaganda.
The court of second instance in Prague upheld Bednarova’s innocence, but the state prosecutor appealed, seeking an eight-month jail sentence and a five-year ban on teaching or involvement in education or other work with children.
Ultimately, the prosecutor’s additional charges were rejected and the original acquittal was upheld. The final verdict affirms that people cannot be handed a sentence or penalized for having a “personal opinion.” The presiding judge said that Bednarova’s original loss of employment was punishment enough.
This case highlights the limits of relying on the judiciary as the last line of defense when it comes to safeguarding democracy. Across Europe, we continue to see instances of “dinosaur judges” enabling people who endanger national security to escape accountability. The Czech Republic is clearly no exception.
Europe’s efforts to counter Moscow’s covert manipulation through disinformation have been an uphill battle from the outset.
Disinformation and rumors spread rapidly on social media, amplified by fake news Web sites and coordinated with troll networks that fuel polarization and erode public trust in Czechs’ faith in liberal democracy.
In April last year, Prague announced it would shut down the news Web site Voice of Europe, which had received substantial funding from Viktor Medvedchuk, a pro-Russia Ukrainian oligarch exiled to Russia in a prisoner exchange.
Medvedchuk had covertly financed and disguised the site as a legitimate media outlet. Voice of Europe ran paid advertisements to exert political influence, promoted calls to end military aid to Ukraine and advocated for the lifting of sanctions on Russia.
Medvedchuk also bribed European parliamentarians to promote anti-European narratives and cast doubt on continued support for Ukraine, even backing Russia-supporting candidates in European parliamentary elections.
Voice of Europe is clearly a Russian puppet. The Kremlin’s claws run deep in European politics. Taiwan is also no stranger to manipulation attempts by a powerful neighbor.
Bednarova later headed a pro-Russia demonstration where she shouted Russian propaganda at the top of her lungs. Czech commentators derided her shouts as akin to those of a physics professor who, outdated and out of place, still advocates that the Earth is flat and continues to mislead students. Shouting from a street corner is indeed a more suitable venue than a classroom for her to express her “personal opinions.”
Chen Yung-chang is a freelance writer based in Taipei.
Translated by Tim Smith
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS