Taiwanese artists developing their careers in China often make statements — given freely or under pressure — that “Taiwan is a part of China.” Some Chinese spouses of Taiwanese who are Internet influencers have also sparked controversy for promoting “military unification” and the idea that “Taiwan is a province of China” during live streams.
However, Taiwan was not a Chinese territory for long: Before being controlled by China under the Qing Dynasty, it was occupied by the Dutch and the Spanish.
In 1661, Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功), also known as Koxinga, a Ming Dynasty loyalist, expelled the Dutch and occupied part of Taiwan as a base for his movement to restore the Ming Dynasty.
Cheng died in 1662. In 1683, to wipe out the remnants of the Ming Dynasty, Emperor Kangxi (康熙) of the Qing sent Cheng’s surrendered general Shi Lang (施琅) to attack Taiwan, bringing about the capitulation of Cheng’s grandson Cheng Ke-shuang (鄭克塽) and the incorporation of Taiwan into the Qing Dynasty’s territory the following year.
In the Sino-Japanese War of 1895, the Qing Dynasty was defeated and ceded Taiwan.
Taiwan became a Japanese colony and was ruled by Japan for half a century.
At the end of World War II in 1945, the US-led Allied forces defeated Japan, which gave up its sovereignty over Taiwan and Penghu.
In 1949, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) of the Republic of China (ROC) was defeated by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in the Chinese Civil War, losing its territory and retreating to Taiwan, as well as what are now Penghu, Kinmen and Lienchiang counties.
The CCP set up its own regime and established the People’s Republic of China (PRC).
The PRC has repeatedly claimed sovereignty over Taiwan by arguing that it once belonged to China, saying that the “Chinese Civil War has not yet ended.”
The UN recognizes the PRC as the only legitimate representative of China.
However, the ROC has effectively ruled Taiwan, including its outlying counties, for 80 years, while the PRC has never governed it for a single day.
In 1949, the PRC erected a tombstone for the ROC on Purple Mountain (紫金山) in Nanjing, declaring that the ROC had perished, denying the fact that the ROC continues to exist in Taiwan.
World history is full of accounts of powers dividing and uniting territories, and no country can stand forever.
The territory of an empire often increases or decreases with the rise and fall of national power.
In the 13th century, Genghis Khan conquered the east and the west, established four khanates in Europe and Asia, and ruled China for nearly 100 years after toppling the Song Dynasty and establishing the Yuan Dynasty, but the only territory his descendants own today is the Mongolian steppe.
During the Roman Empire, most of Europe was part of what is now Italy.
The Netherlands occupied Taiwan in the 16th century through its maritime power, but later withdrew. Today, located in a corner of Europe, the Netherlands is even smaller than Taiwan [sic].
During the time of the Spanish Armada, many countries in Central and South America were subjects of the Spanish crown.
In the 18th century, the UK gained great national power through the Industrial Revolution and established colonies in the Americas, Africa and Asia to become the “empire on which the sun never sets.”
Before the founding of the US, its territory belonged to the UK.
Today, the UK is mostly limited to the British Isles and regards the US as its most important ally.
Russia used the fact that Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union as one of its reasons for invading. Ironically, hundreds of years ago Kyiv — the capital of modern Ukraine — was the seat of government for the entire region covered by the two nations today.
Powerful countries that intend to invade neighboring countries often use history as a reason, but history is history, and it is not a valid reason to expand power.
If every powerful country were to claim sovereignty over another country’s piece of Earth by citing history, there would never be peace anywhere.
Yihe is a retired business manager.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS