Taiwanese artists developing their careers in China often make statements — given freely or under pressure — that “Taiwan is a part of China.” Some Chinese spouses of Taiwanese who are Internet influencers have also sparked controversy for promoting “military unification” and the idea that “Taiwan is a province of China” during live streams.
However, Taiwan was not a Chinese territory for long: Before being controlled by China under the Qing Dynasty, it was occupied by the Dutch and the Spanish.
In 1661, Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功), also known as Koxinga, a Ming Dynasty loyalist, expelled the Dutch and occupied part of Taiwan as a base for his movement to restore the Ming Dynasty.
Cheng died in 1662. In 1683, to wipe out the remnants of the Ming Dynasty, Emperor Kangxi (康熙) of the Qing sent Cheng’s surrendered general Shi Lang (施琅) to attack Taiwan, bringing about the capitulation of Cheng’s grandson Cheng Ke-shuang (鄭克塽) and the incorporation of Taiwan into the Qing Dynasty’s territory the following year.
In the Sino-Japanese War of 1895, the Qing Dynasty was defeated and ceded Taiwan.
Taiwan became a Japanese colony and was ruled by Japan for half a century.
At the end of World War II in 1945, the US-led Allied forces defeated Japan, which gave up its sovereignty over Taiwan and Penghu.
In 1949, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) of the Republic of China (ROC) was defeated by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in the Chinese Civil War, losing its territory and retreating to Taiwan, as well as what are now Penghu, Kinmen and Lienchiang counties.
The CCP set up its own regime and established the People’s Republic of China (PRC).
The PRC has repeatedly claimed sovereignty over Taiwan by arguing that it once belonged to China, saying that the “Chinese Civil War has not yet ended.”
The UN recognizes the PRC as the only legitimate representative of China.
However, the ROC has effectively ruled Taiwan, including its outlying counties, for 80 years, while the PRC has never governed it for a single day.
In 1949, the PRC erected a tombstone for the ROC on Purple Mountain (紫金山) in Nanjing, declaring that the ROC had perished, denying the fact that the ROC continues to exist in Taiwan.
World history is full of accounts of powers dividing and uniting territories, and no country can stand forever.
The territory of an empire often increases or decreases with the rise and fall of national power.
In the 13th century, Genghis Khan conquered the east and the west, established four khanates in Europe and Asia, and ruled China for nearly 100 years after toppling the Song Dynasty and establishing the Yuan Dynasty, but the only territory his descendants own today is the Mongolian steppe.
During the Roman Empire, most of Europe was part of what is now Italy.
The Netherlands occupied Taiwan in the 16th century through its maritime power, but later withdrew. Today, located in a corner of Europe, the Netherlands is even smaller than Taiwan [sic].
During the time of the Spanish Armada, many countries in Central and South America were subjects of the Spanish crown.
In the 18th century, the UK gained great national power through the Industrial Revolution and established colonies in the Americas, Africa and Asia to become the “empire on which the sun never sets.”
Before the founding of the US, its territory belonged to the UK.
Today, the UK is mostly limited to the British Isles and regards the US as its most important ally.
Russia used the fact that Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union as one of its reasons for invading. Ironically, hundreds of years ago Kyiv — the capital of modern Ukraine — was the seat of government for the entire region covered by the two nations today.
Powerful countries that intend to invade neighboring countries often use history as a reason, but history is history, and it is not a valid reason to expand power.
If every powerful country were to claim sovereignty over another country’s piece of Earth by citing history, there would never be peace anywhere.
Yihe is a retired business manager.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing
RSS