On Monday, US President Donald Trump took to social media with a shocking statement in response to China’s 34 percent retaliatory tariffs on US imports, angrily condemning the move as going against his prior warnings. He threatened that if China did not withdraw its 34 percent counter-tariffs by the end of the day on Tuesday, the US would impose an additional 50 percent punitive tariff on Chinese imports starting from midnight on Wednesday. He also warned that “all talks with China concerning their requested meetings with us will be terminated!”
Trump’s statement illustrated that the US would no longer tolerate China’s unfair practices — prolonged abuse of tariffs, non-tariff barriers, illegal subsidies for businesses and long-term manipulation of exchange rates — and would respond strictly to its continuously escalating trade provocations. China’s Ministry of Commerce fired back in response, stating that China would “fight to the end.” Tariffs of a cumulative 104 percent took effect against China on Wednesday, which Trump increased to 125 percent later that day.
Upon closer inspection, Trump’s series of statements and actions are not solely focused on using tariffs as an economic tool, but instead reflect a strategic consideration to lure the snake out of its hole and strike it while its head is exposed. It is clear that he is attempting to use his harsh “reciprocal” tariff policy to progressively escalate the economic friction between the US and China into a full-scale strategic confrontation — even if it comes with the risk of pushing both sides to the brink of war.
In reality, after Trump announced the retaliatory tariffs, China’s pro-war factions immediately mocked him and the US. Chinese state-sponsored media outlets such as China Global Television Network and Xinhua released artificial intelligence-generated content, including a song titled The Tragedy of Tariffs and a video featuring a humanoid robot named “TARIFF.”
In the video, the robot criticizes the US for using tariffs as a weapon, warning that it would lead to a never-ending trade war that would bring suffering to all citizens. In the end, the robot — unable to fulfill its mission of protecting the best interests of humanity — self-destructs. The video uses the robot’s self-destruction to portray Trump’s trade policies as not only failing to protect US interests, but for potentially destroying global supply chains and ruining economic stability.
China responded to Trump’s “Liberation Day” with sarcasm and mockery, displaying an arrogant and conceited attitude. This behavior only furthered Trump’s anger and ignited a confrontational spark that led to this week’s sharp and sudden increase in US-China tensions.
As the world reels from the shock of this trade confrontation, pro-peace voices within China have been all but completely suppressed — only the hardline pro-war factions remain, manipulating and dominating the public discourse. After Trump initially announced the US would implement a 34 percent tariff on Chinese imports, China quickly retaliated with a 34 percent counter-tariff.
Soon after, a post on the WeChat messaging app written by someone called He Bin (賀濱) — purportedly an academic associated with the Public Policy Research Center at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS), a major Chinese think tank — circulated online. The post said that implementing retaliatory tariffs would be a mistake on China’s part, likening it to a “you hit your wife, I’ll hit mine” mentality, arguing the move is akin to China following the US in shooting its own foot.
However, the post quickly attracted public criticism and was labelled as defeatist. On Sunday, after less than one week, CASS announced that the Public Policy Research Center with which He was affiliated would officially be abolished and its research projects transferred to CASS’ Institute of Economics, highlighting the Chinese Communist Party’s strict zero-tolerance policy toward internal dissent.
The particularly abnormal and volatile international situation calls for even more caution in handling the geopolitical risks across the Taiwan Strait. Taiwan is not only faced with the economic rivalry between two major world powers, but also with the accompanying hidden provocations that could affect the stability of the Taiwan Strait.
If the two behemoths on either side of Taiwan actually engage in armed conflict, it would be impossible for our nation to remain uninvolved. Whether it is disruptions to the global supply chain, fluctuations in financial markets or diplomatic pressure, all are challenges that Taiwan must cautiously address.
This latest tariff confrontation might just be the tip of the iceberg — the deeper issues are the complete reorganization of the global order and inevitable ideological conflicts. As dark clouds begin to gather, Taiwan must make hay while the sun still shines and prepare itself to weather the storm.
Liao Ming-hui is an assistant researcher at the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
RSS