On Monday, US President Donald Trump took to social media with a shocking statement in response to China’s 34 percent retaliatory tariffs on US imports, angrily condemning the move as going against his prior warnings. He threatened that if China did not withdraw its 34 percent counter-tariffs by the end of the day on Tuesday, the US would impose an additional 50 percent punitive tariff on Chinese imports starting from midnight on Wednesday. He also warned that “all talks with China concerning their requested meetings with us will be terminated!”
Trump’s statement illustrated that the US would no longer tolerate China’s unfair practices — prolonged abuse of tariffs, non-tariff barriers, illegal subsidies for businesses and long-term manipulation of exchange rates — and would respond strictly to its continuously escalating trade provocations. China’s Ministry of Commerce fired back in response, stating that China would “fight to the end.” Tariffs of a cumulative 104 percent took effect against China on Wednesday, which Trump increased to 125 percent later that day.
Upon closer inspection, Trump’s series of statements and actions are not solely focused on using tariffs as an economic tool, but instead reflect a strategic consideration to lure the snake out of its hole and strike it while its head is exposed. It is clear that he is attempting to use his harsh “reciprocal” tariff policy to progressively escalate the economic friction between the US and China into a full-scale strategic confrontation — even if it comes with the risk of pushing both sides to the brink of war.
In reality, after Trump announced the retaliatory tariffs, China’s pro-war factions immediately mocked him and the US. Chinese state-sponsored media outlets such as China Global Television Network and Xinhua released artificial intelligence-generated content, including a song titled The Tragedy of Tariffs and a video featuring a humanoid robot named “TARIFF.”
In the video, the robot criticizes the US for using tariffs as a weapon, warning that it would lead to a never-ending trade war that would bring suffering to all citizens. In the end, the robot — unable to fulfill its mission of protecting the best interests of humanity — self-destructs. The video uses the robot’s self-destruction to portray Trump’s trade policies as not only failing to protect US interests, but for potentially destroying global supply chains and ruining economic stability.
China responded to Trump’s “Liberation Day” with sarcasm and mockery, displaying an arrogant and conceited attitude. This behavior only furthered Trump’s anger and ignited a confrontational spark that led to this week’s sharp and sudden increase in US-China tensions.
As the world reels from the shock of this trade confrontation, pro-peace voices within China have been all but completely suppressed — only the hardline pro-war factions remain, manipulating and dominating the public discourse. After Trump initially announced the US would implement a 34 percent tariff on Chinese imports, China quickly retaliated with a 34 percent counter-tariff.
Soon after, a post on the WeChat messaging app written by someone called He Bin (賀濱) — purportedly an academic associated with the Public Policy Research Center at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS), a major Chinese think tank — circulated online. The post said that implementing retaliatory tariffs would be a mistake on China’s part, likening it to a “you hit your wife, I’ll hit mine” mentality, arguing the move is akin to China following the US in shooting its own foot.
However, the post quickly attracted public criticism and was labelled as defeatist. On Sunday, after less than one week, CASS announced that the Public Policy Research Center with which He was affiliated would officially be abolished and its research projects transferred to CASS’ Institute of Economics, highlighting the Chinese Communist Party’s strict zero-tolerance policy toward internal dissent.
The particularly abnormal and volatile international situation calls for even more caution in handling the geopolitical risks across the Taiwan Strait. Taiwan is not only faced with the economic rivalry between two major world powers, but also with the accompanying hidden provocations that could affect the stability of the Taiwan Strait.
If the two behemoths on either side of Taiwan actually engage in armed conflict, it would be impossible for our nation to remain uninvolved. Whether it is disruptions to the global supply chain, fluctuations in financial markets or diplomatic pressure, all are challenges that Taiwan must cautiously address.
This latest tariff confrontation might just be the tip of the iceberg — the deeper issues are the complete reorganization of the global order and inevitable ideological conflicts. As dark clouds begin to gather, Taiwan must make hay while the sun still shines and prepare itself to weather the storm.
Liao Ming-hui is an assistant researcher at the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS