On Wednesday last week, US President Donald Trump swung the tariff sword and left the whole world crying out in pain. On Friday the Executive Yuan announced that it would allocate NT$88 billion (US$2.7 billion) to assist industrial and agricultural sectors impacted by the tariffs.
However, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is making increasingly costly and exorbitant demands, suggesting that last year’s NT$528.3 billion tax revenue surplus be put to use.
It was not that long ago that the KMT was arguing for something else entirely. KMT caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) had called for a universal cash payment of NT$10,000 to every taxpayer, while KMT caucus deputy secretary-general Wang Hung-wei (王鴻薇) in February said that the universal cash subsidy proposal would definitely be addressed during the current legislative session — even if it meant calling an extraordinary session or extending the current one.
However, distributing NT$10,000 to every taxpayer would be an immediate expense of NT$230 billion — nearly half of the total surplus.
If the government did this, what surplus funds would it have left to cope with Trump’s tariff storm? In hindsight, it is fortunate that the government pushed back on the KMT’s proposal.
This situation makes it clear that the KMT has no clue how to run a country — it only knows how to react.
The tariff shock has only just begun, and the KMT should share in these difficult times rather than proposing such horrible ideas.
Huang Wei-ping works in public service and has a master’s degree from the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University in the US.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing
RSS