The era of mass recall campaigns has seen bizarre incidents — among the most startling are “ghost signatures,” or deceased people’s names showing up on recall petitions.
During the first-phase recall petition against Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Wu Pei-yi (吳沛憶), it was revealed that 108 signatures belonged to people who had died before the petitions were filed.
As the proposal’s initiator, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Youth League member Lee Hsiao-liang (李孝亮) found himself under fire for the scandal. His mother came forward, saying senior KMT officials pressured her son into spearheading the campaign. Even KMT city councils believed it was normal for Lee to have access to the party roster.
The person who copies the roster should be held responsible for any issues that arise — not a young person such as Lee, who should not have to shoulder such a burden alone.
Lee joined the KMT recently and was still in the exploratory phase, yet he took on such an important task. It would be a lie to say he did not face any external pressure. It is quite possible that his superiors manipulated or persuaded him, leaving a young, inexperienced and new party member with no room to refuse.
The situation reminds me of my high-school days when my classmates and I were summoned to listen to a speech. We barely understood what was being said, yet somehow, by the end, we had all joined the KMT. It felt like manipulation — or perhaps something more subtle and insidious, like group hypnosis.
I cannot say with certainty that Lee was tricked into joining the KMT. I believe he is a young person with enthusiasm for politics. However, I cannot help but question whether the KMT’s culture is problematic.
I feel for Lee — he was thrust into the front lines, with no clear way to retreat, and bears the burden as a scapegoat for something he might not fully understand. Is it really fair to place that weight on someone so young?
Perhaps that is the main reason why the KMT struggles to recruit young members— the party’s internal culture is opaque and lacks respect for young people. Watching them throw a young person such as Lee directly into the line of fire, only evokes sympathy in me, especially as someone who has experienced similar dynamics in the past.
If that culture is not addressed and reformed, the gap between the KMT and younger generations would only continue to grow.
Li Kuan-long is a university professor.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing
RSS