When OpenAI’s GPT-4o model debuted its multimodal capabilities last month, it sparked a wave of artificial intelligence (AI)-generated art across the Internet. The first viral sensation it triggered was “Ghiblification” — a trending phenomenon of social media users turning ordinary photographs into images evocative of Studio Ghibli’s animation, the Japanese animation studio behind films such as My Neighbor Totoro and Spirited Away.
While global users’ frenzy has put a heavy strain on OpenAI’s GPUs, the trend has raised questions about potential copyright breaches, and pushed discussions concerning artistic integrity and humanity to the forefront in the technology industry.
Many artists have taken issue with AI image generators, arguing that the vast datasets used to train models contain copyrighted works without explicit authorization from creators.
As generative AI tools are known to regurgitate replicas of content they were trained on, any works that these tools create are at best mimicry, regardless of the level of human prompting. This is why so many Ghibli fans found the trend a direct affront to the studio — AI has butchered the cultivated aesthetics of an animation studio famous for its pro-humanistic themes.
Ghibli artists who have spent decades of their lives making transcendent, beautiful animation, are now seeing it “mass produced” or “sloppified” into a meme by a single algorithm in less than a minute.
The traditional time-consuming process of making an animated film, involving hundreds of frame-by-frame images, could soon become a thing of the past. AI replacing human labor is not only a concern for the animation industry, but a hazard for different industries, from art, music, publishing, journalism and law to medicine. With a few instructions and prompts, AI could achieve results humans spent decades perfecting and honing.
It should come as no surprise that Studio Ghibli cofounder Hayao Miyazaki did not find AI an inspiring invention, saying in a 2016 interview: “I feel like we are nearing the end of times. We humans are losing faith in ourselves.”
To strive for better speed, greater efficiency and to cut down on human labor, people have tried to take shortcuts and “outsource” their labor and intelligence to computers. This natural tendency toward sloth could easily turn humans into “cyborgs”: beings that cannot survive or function without machines doing the heavy lifting.
The silver lining so far might be that Miyazaki and Studio Ghibli remain a distinct “style” that acts as an origin or source for AI to be trained. Yet without years of dedication and repeated practice (which AI is now fully capable of achieving after being trained), it is hard to imagine how “style” or the traditional sense of a “master” would be achieved in the future. Without style, humans would lose their unique touch and fingerprint on the world, creating only poor shadows of past artists’ works.
In Taiwan, science, technology, engineering and mathematics majors are widely regarded as being better than liberal arts majors, whose professions are often belittled as either useless or on the brink of replacement by AI. With the proliferation of AI-generated works, it could be expected that fewer people would be working in the arts, and for those who do, AI could soon become a tool that many would rely heavily on for producing works.
The Ghibli AI trend has underscored the conflict between celebrating or tainting a cherished art legacy, and from a wider aspect, between technology and humanity. AI art is a double-edged sword — one that holds incredible promise, but must be handled with care.
It is high time that people find a middle ground where AI art can coexist with traditional art without one undermining the other. To take a step further, it is imperative that humans find a path of not losing faith in ourselves in the world of technology.
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big
RSS