Actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) on March 13 posted an Instagram caption after the opening of Tiffany’s Taipei flagship store two days earlier that read: “Thank you Tiffany for inviting us to Taipei China.”
We know that Yeoh knows Taipei is in Taiwan, not China, because the caption was posted following comments she made — in English — in which she said: “Thank you to Tiffany for bringing me to Taipei, because I do love this country very much.”
Her remarks and the subsequent Instagram caption were reported in Taiwan, in Chinese and English-
language media such as Radio Free Asia, and overseas, including her home country, Malaysia, and online social media platforms such as Reddit.
In the Taipei Times, the issue has sparked a debate between Institute for National Defense and Security Research visiting fellow Sasha Chhabra and Marcel Oppliger, a Chilean journalist and writer living in Taipei.
Writing on Saturday last week (“Yeoh is welcome any time,” page 8), Oppliger disagreed with Chhabra’s suggestion that Taiwan should impose a lifetime entry ban on Yeoh and prohibit government funding for her films (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8). Oppliger said this reaction — which Chhabra himself acknowledged was “severe” — was inappropriate for a country that espouses democracy and personal freedoms, adding that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) would regard the headline “Michelle Yeoh banned from Taiwan” as something of a propaganda coup.
On Tuesday, Chhabra penned a response, “Borders are a part of a country’s sovereignty,” saying that Yeoh had acted “in a premeditated way to join China’s cognitive warfare and propaganda against Taiwan.” He wrote that the CCP would not like the headline, as it would suggest that Beijing did not have control over the borders of one if its “provinces.”
The two writers have different interpretations of Yeoh’s motivations. Chhabra sees her Instagram caption as a calculated, cynical collusion with the CCP’s propaganda machine; Oppliger is willing to believe that it was simply a cold calculation of reputational and financial gain and loss.
However, both men seem to agree that an opportunity exists to use the situation, reported internationally in Chinese and English media, to emphasize Taiwan’s message, that it is a sovereign country deserving of respect, even if their way of framing that opportunity, and how to go about capitalizing on it, differs radically.
Here is another interpretation: During her live comments, in an unguarded moment, Yeoh said what she knew instinctively to be true; her Instagram caption reflected what her, or Tiffany’s, public relations team wanted the world to see, under implicit or explicit pressure from Beijing.
Comments on Yeoh’s Instagram post reflect the debate, for and against, Taiwan’s sovereignty, either expressing disappointment in Yeoh or praising her choice of words. The point is the implications were not lost on either side; there was no normalization of the term “country,” only an awareness and highlighting of why it is so contentious in this context.
Punishing Yeoh might be misunderstanding the nature of the opportunity. It might be more instructive to ask why the CCP is so sensitive about how people speak of Taiwan in the international media, which it cannot control, as it does with its own media.
US academic and historian Stephen Kotkin, who has written about the collapse of the Soviet Union, has said that authoritarian systems are strong yet brittle. The military drills around Taiwan on Tuesday were an expression of China’s strength; its sensitivity to news of any entertainer calling Taiwan a country is an expression of weakness and the CCP leadership’s awareness of the brittle nature of its hold on power. The brittle nature of its narrative on Taiwan derives from its inability to withstand scrutiny.
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS