The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) recently announced it would propose two referendums — one opposing the “abolishment of the death penalty” and another opposing “martial law and war.” The Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) also supports the proposals. Ironically, the more the blue and white camps push for those referendums, the more they undermine their own cause.
First, referendums are meant as an alternative to representative democracy — they are a way for the public to express their will in the event that representative democracy fails.
However, since combining forces to form a legislative majority, the KMT and TPP have regarded themselves as true representatives of majority public opinion, dominating the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) in every vote. To propose those referendums now is tantamount to denying their own value as representatives of the public’s will.
Second, since President William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration, one execution has already been carried out and he has repeatedly said that martial law would not make a return to Taiwan.
The opposition alliance’s use of irrelevant and non-divisive issues for referendums not only wastes public money, but also squanders valuable deliberative time that could be spent addressing matters that genuinely impact people’s daily lives.
Third, if the blue and white camp wishes to increase the number and execution of death penalty sentences, or to abolish or significantly amend the Martial Law Act (戒嚴法), they can easily use the legislative process to do so — there is no need to complicate things further by initiating unnecessary referendums.
After all, there have been many instances where bills were pushed through despite significant opposition, with the KMT and TPP using their numerical advantage to secure passage.
Yet, on these two issues, they have suddenly abandoned that strategy — revealing that their real focus is political maneuvering, not a sincere commitment to opposing martial law or the abolition of the death penalty.
As the KMT faces a growing recall campaign, it has shown itself incapable of presenting a meaningful record of political achievements or genuine national vision. Instead, it has resorted to wasting public funds by weaponizing two serious issues — capital punishment and martial law.
By pushing referendums, they are trying to mobilize voters against the recall campaigns — their tactics are cheap and unbecoming of a party that claims to stand for the public interest.
Huang Wei-ping works in public service.
Translated by Tim Smith and Kyra Gustavsen
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing
RSS