The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) recently announced it would propose two referendums — one opposing the “abolishment of the death penalty” and another opposing “martial law and war.” The Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) also supports the proposals. Ironically, the more the blue and white camps push for those referendums, the more they undermine their own cause.
First, referendums are meant as an alternative to representative democracy — they are a way for the public to express their will in the event that representative democracy fails.
However, since combining forces to form a legislative majority, the KMT and TPP have regarded themselves as true representatives of majority public opinion, dominating the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) in every vote. To propose those referendums now is tantamount to denying their own value as representatives of the public’s will.
Second, since President William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration, one execution has already been carried out and he has repeatedly said that martial law would not make a return to Taiwan.
The opposition alliance’s use of irrelevant and non-divisive issues for referendums not only wastes public money, but also squanders valuable deliberative time that could be spent addressing matters that genuinely impact people’s daily lives.
Third, if the blue and white camp wishes to increase the number and execution of death penalty sentences, or to abolish or significantly amend the Martial Law Act (戒嚴法), they can easily use the legislative process to do so — there is no need to complicate things further by initiating unnecessary referendums.
After all, there have been many instances where bills were pushed through despite significant opposition, with the KMT and TPP using their numerical advantage to secure passage.
Yet, on these two issues, they have suddenly abandoned that strategy — revealing that their real focus is political maneuvering, not a sincere commitment to opposing martial law or the abolition of the death penalty.
As the KMT faces a growing recall campaign, it has shown itself incapable of presenting a meaningful record of political achievements or genuine national vision. Instead, it has resorted to wasting public funds by weaponizing two serious issues — capital punishment and martial law.
By pushing referendums, they are trying to mobilize voters against the recall campaigns — their tactics are cheap and unbecoming of a party that claims to stand for the public interest.
Huang Wei-ping works in public service.
Translated by Tim Smith and Kyra Gustavsen
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS