Taipei First Girls’ High School Chinese literature teacher Alice Ou (區桂芝) has been put under the spotlight again for an interview with China Central Television (CCTV).
In her interview with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-run station, Ou reportedly said that President William Lai (賴清德) should not call China an external hostile force because she still wanted to visit her mother and relatives in China. She questioned whether defining China as an external hostile force would imply that she should view her mother as an enemy.
Mainland Affairs Council Deputy Minister and spokesman Liang Wen-chieh (梁文傑), when asked if Ou’s interview constituted collusion, on Thursday said that it was “really inappropriate” for Ou to be interviewed by CCTV, and that “she knows the reason why CCTV wanted to interview her. It is because she would say what they wanted to hear.”
There has been extensive discussion over Ou’s remarks. Many questioned if she is too pro-China, and whether it would influence Taiwanese society and the education sector.
Her comments demonstrated that she interprets cross-strait affairs sentimentally, simplifying the issue as a family relationship. What she said downplays the complexity of cross-strait relations. What China has been doing to Taiwan — be they political, economic or military threats — has been deeply worrying and disturbing to Taiwanese.
Lai’s statement acknowledged that Taiwan has to take preventive measures when facing challenges brought by China. Ou’s remark, which framed the issue as a family relationship, ignored the interests of Taiwanese society as a whole and the country’s national security.
Another matter is whether her comments contravened the Teachers’ Act (教師法). Educators shoulder responsibilities of knowledge transfer and instilling values in students. They should be cautious and objective when they publicly express their opinions. They should also avoid political controversies.
Would a teacher who has long been publicly supporting China and criticizing the Taiwanese government negatively affect students? A teacher has a duty not only to demonstrate academic achievements, but also good conduct and a sense of responsibility.
Although Ou is entitled to freedom of speech, are her comments ethical and do they comply with the regulations in the education sector? Should the education authorities step in to provide guidance and censor her comments?
The controversies Ou’s comments have sparked are not merely about personal viewpoints. It is about Taiwan’s social values and educators’ duties. When teachers express their opinions on political issues, they should carefully consider how they would affect students and society.
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has said China has not given up on “unifying” with Taiwan by force. Why has Ou not criticized Xi’s intention?
Everyone is entitled to have their own political stance. Ou, keeping the halo of teaching at the Taipei First Girls’ High School, has been criticizing her own country in interviews with the media. Yet she turns a blind eye to China’s threatening gestures and malicious acts against Taiwan.
Ou, who is keen on classic works of Chinese literature, should read Confucius’ (孔子) Analects (論語) again.
Zeng Shen (曾參), the ancient Chinese philosopher and disciple of Confucius, said: “I examine myself daily on three points.” Has Ou been able to do so?
Lin Cheng-wu is a junior-high school teacher.
Translated by Fion Khan
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
After thousands of Taiwanese fans poured into the Tokyo Dome to cheer for Taiwan’s national team in the World Baseball Classic’s (WBC) Pool C games, an image of food and drink waste left at the stadium said to have been left by Taiwanese fans began spreading on social media. The image sparked wide debate, only later to be revealed as an artificially generated image. The image caption claimed that “Taiwanese left trash everywhere after watching the game in Tokyo Dome,” and said that one of the “three bad habits” of Taiwanese is littering. However, a reporter from a Japanese media outlet
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
RSS