Recently, there have been several incidents involving exterior tiles falling off buildings and injuring passers-by.
One such incident occurred last week in Taipei, when a piece of concrete debris fell from a building on Linsen N Road (林森北路), penetrated a safety net and struck the roof of a car that was waiting at a red light. The car’s roof was dented and a child sitting in the back seat was injured. This incident clearly illustrates that installing safety nets as a temporary measure is not enough to guarantee safety.
December to March is Taiwan’s “tile injury season.” Dramatic temperature fluctuations cause the tiles on exterior walls to peel off and fall. If such an incident does not make a spectacular scene or cause enough damage or injury, the media would not even report it. Local government safety warnings are useless.
This issue has long been a part of daily life in Taiwanese society. The reason it continues to happen and no improvements are made lies in a lack of systematic thinking — many illogical blind spots exist at the common sense level, and none have ever been taken seriously or resolved.
Exterior tiles are prone to falling, so why not follow other countries and prohibit the installation of tiles on exterior walls above a certain height? Once a building’s exterior tiles begin to fall, that entire wall — or even the entire exterior — should not be trusted. It is also common to see buildings with sections of their exterior walls covered in tiles of different colors, indicating that new tiles were installed after the previous ones fell off. Is continuously replacing individual tiles not a complete waste of time?
Furthermore, many apartment buildings adopt such an illogical approach due to a lack of funds or a desire to save money. The Condominium Administration Act (公寓大廈管理條例) was promulgated nearly 30 years ago. Why does the public still lack the necessary thinking and concrete actions to adequately address these issues?
We know that the government is aware of these circumstances — why, then, has there not been action to improve the situation?
The answer is simple — it is because no one is in charge. There is no systematic thinking if officials are not held accountable. To effectively resolve this threat to public safety, it is an absolute must that public officials be designated responsible should another accident occur. Otherwise, the public would be forced to continue living in fear of being struck by falling tiles.
Zou Ho-le is a cofounder of the Condominium Administration 2.0 movement.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS