This year’s tax revenue surplus exceeded NT$528.3 billion (US$15.96 billion). The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is proposing to “return money to the people,” with a plan to send a universal cash payout of NT$10,000 to every taxpayer. The KMT-majority legislature has passed a first reading of a special legal proposal to that end.
However, Taiwan Power Co (Taipower), facing long-term pressure from price increases on international energy imports since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022, has sustained long-term losses for several years in a row. The utility company has racked up about NT$400 billion in debt to date.
The Executive Yuan originally planned to allocate more than NT$100 billion in subsidies from the surplus tax revenue to alleviate some of the pressure on the electricity provider and stave off risks of electricity price hikes.
However, the KMT’s slashing of the budget has prevented Taipower from receiving subsidies It is being forced to bear all-out pressure to raise electricity prices, which would ripple into the daily lives of all Taiwanese following a price hike.
Handing out a universal cash payout to everyone seems like a beneficial policy decision, but the reality is that such measures have a limited effect on economic growth and stimulating domestic demand.
Experience shows that most Taiwanese would opt to put such universal cash payouts into savings accounts or to pay off personal debt — a limited amount of that money ever makes its way back into consumer markets, and its contribution to GDP is negligible. On the contrary, it is extremely easy to turn tax rebate payouts into a tool for currying favor with voters.
Shoring up Taipower could directly reduce the pressure of electricity price-adjustment pressures from annual losses, and would help the nation avoid society-wide price hikes and soaring prices, which would further maintain consumer price index stability.
Electricity price hikes not only drag on more expensive kitchen-table economics, they can increase the operational overhead for everyone, as reflected in consumer prices and living expenses.
Thus, the legislature should shift away from its goal of shortsighted, near-term benefits via a universal cash payout, and instead move to pay off Taipower’s losses and stabilize our energy grid and energy pricing structures.
That would be the best way to benefit the entire nation: It could reduce Taipower’s debt and the growing pressure to raise rates, while guaranteeing that basic living expenses would not be impacted by potential electricity rate hikes.
Although a universal cash payout is on the surface more desirable, in the end it only obscures the bigger picture. In critical times such as these, we should hope that all of the nation’s political parties would put comprehensive thought into governance and use resources where they matter most to create policy that truly benefits everyone.
Lee Li-sheng is a research assistant at the Taiwan Economy and Industry Association and a graduate student at National Taiwan Normal University.
Translated by Tim Smith
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
China’s supreme objective in a war across the Taiwan Strait is to incorporate Taiwan as a province of the People’s Republic. It follows, therefore, that international recognition of Taiwan’s de jure independence is a consummation that China’s leaders devoutly wish to avoid. By the same token, an American strategy to deny China that objective would complicate Beijing’s calculus and deter large-scale hostilities. For decades, China has cautioned “independence means war.” The opposite is also true: “war means independence.” A comprehensive strategy of denial would guarantee an outcome of de jure independence for Taiwan in the event of Chinese invasion or
A recent Taipei Times editorial (“A targeted bilingual policy,” March 12, page 8) questioned how the Ministry of Education can justify spending NT$151 million (US$4.74 million) when the spotlighted achievements are English speech competitions and campus tours. It is a fair question, but it focuses on the wrong issue. The problem is not last year’s outcomes failing to meet the bilingual education vision; the issue is that the ministry has abandoned the program that originally justified such a large expenditure. In the early years of Bilingual 2030, the ministry’s K-12 Administration promoted the Bilingual Instruction in Select Domains Program (部分領域課程雙語教學實施計畫).
Former Fijian prime minister Mahendra Chaudhry spoke at the Yushan Forum in Taipei on Monday, saying that while global conflicts were causing economic strife in the world, Taiwan’s New Southbound Policy (NSP) serves as a stabilizing force in the Indo-Pacific region and offers strategic opportunities for small island nations such as Fiji, as well as support in the fields of public health, education, renewable energy and agricultural technology. Taiwan does not have official diplomatic relations with Fiji, but it is one of the small island nations covered by the NSP. Chaudhry said that Fiji, as a sovereign nation, should support
RSS