Switzerland, a country of rock-solid neutrality in the heart of Europe, seems to be facing a historical decision. Having preserved its tradition of neutrality for nearly 200 years, it has always managed to maintain stability and mediate international storms. However, the country broke its longstanding silence on March 13, when Swiss Federal Councilor Ignazio Cassis — who heads the Swiss Department of Foreign Affairs — issued a statement of concern over the escalation of tensions in the Taiwan Strait.
This statement was not without purpose. China’s sudden live-fire military drills in the Taiwan Strait last month not only sparked concern in the region, but even reached as far as Europe. Switzerland’s own definition of neutrality is no longer limited to non-participation in wars — it has expanded to include the moral responsibility and practical interest of safeguarding the international order.
Since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Switzerland has joined other countries in imposing economic sanctions on Russia, breaking its policy of neutrality. The decision to speak out on the Taiwan Strait issue could be seen as a continuation and deepening of this new approach. Swiss Federal Assembly member Jean-Luc Addor said during a legislative session that the Taiwan Strait is crucial to Swiss economic interests. His words reveal the logic behind the action — economic security, geopolitical stability and humanitarian principles cannot be avoided.
This move is not a betrayal of Swiss neutrality, but a modernization. As the international community relies increasingly on the rules-based order and cooperative governance, neutrality should be more than just passive observation — it should take the form of active guardianship. Switzerland’s statement did not indicate that it is taking sides, but emphasized dialogue and peace. This reflects a new interpretation of neutrality.
Switzerland would inevitably have to achieve a delicate balance between sticking to its longstanding principles and adapting to reality. Swiss neutrality is evolving. It is no longer just about silence and concessions — it is about speaking out selectively in defense of principles. The key factor to observe in the future would be whether Switzerland could manage to uphold the core values of its neutral spirit and courageously face the challenges of the current international order without abandoning its beliefs.
Edwin Yang is an associate professor at National Taiwan Normal University and chairman of the Central Taiwan Association of University Professors.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
After thousands of Taiwanese fans poured into the Tokyo Dome to cheer for Taiwan’s national team in the World Baseball Classic’s (WBC) Pool C games, an image of food and drink waste left at the stadium said to have been left by Taiwanese fans began spreading on social media. The image sparked wide debate, only later to be revealed as an artificially generated image. The image caption claimed that “Taiwanese left trash everywhere after watching the game in Tokyo Dome,” and said that one of the “three bad habits” of Taiwanese is littering. However, a reporter from a Japanese media outlet
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
RSS