Switzerland, a country of rock-solid neutrality in the heart of Europe, seems to be facing a historical decision. Having preserved its tradition of neutrality for nearly 200 years, it has always managed to maintain stability and mediate international storms. However, the country broke its longstanding silence on March 13, when Swiss Federal Councilor Ignazio Cassis — who heads the Swiss Department of Foreign Affairs — issued a statement of concern over the escalation of tensions in the Taiwan Strait.
This statement was not without purpose. China’s sudden live-fire military drills in the Taiwan Strait last month not only sparked concern in the region, but even reached as far as Europe. Switzerland’s own definition of neutrality is no longer limited to non-participation in wars — it has expanded to include the moral responsibility and practical interest of safeguarding the international order.
Since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Switzerland has joined other countries in imposing economic sanctions on Russia, breaking its policy of neutrality. The decision to speak out on the Taiwan Strait issue could be seen as a continuation and deepening of this new approach. Swiss Federal Assembly member Jean-Luc Addor said during a legislative session that the Taiwan Strait is crucial to Swiss economic interests. His words reveal the logic behind the action — economic security, geopolitical stability and humanitarian principles cannot be avoided.
This move is not a betrayal of Swiss neutrality, but a modernization. As the international community relies increasingly on the rules-based order and cooperative governance, neutrality should be more than just passive observation — it should take the form of active guardianship. Switzerland’s statement did not indicate that it is taking sides, but emphasized dialogue and peace. This reflects a new interpretation of neutrality.
Switzerland would inevitably have to achieve a delicate balance between sticking to its longstanding principles and adapting to reality. Swiss neutrality is evolving. It is no longer just about silence and concessions — it is about speaking out selectively in defense of principles. The key factor to observe in the future would be whether Switzerland could manage to uphold the core values of its neutral spirit and courageously face the challenges of the current international order without abandoning its beliefs.
Edwin Yang is an associate professor at National Taiwan Normal University and chairman of the Central Taiwan Association of University Professors.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS