Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China.
Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government should announce a lifetime ban on entry into the country for Yeoh and there should be a prohibition on government-backed agencies funding films or productions involving Yeoh. The Motion Picture Development Foundation should seriously consider disqualifying any films starring Yeoh from eligibility for the Golden Horse Awards.
These consequences might seem severe, but they are entirely necessary if Taiwan is serious about defending its national sovereignty.
This month, President William Lai (賴清德) delivered a major address on defending national security and countering China’s “united front” efforts at eroding Taiwan’s sovereignty. Lai laid out 17 major strategies, including countering China’s efforts to erase Taiwan from the international community, and responding to China’s pressuring of Taiwanese entertainers to post statements supporting a Chinese takeover of Taiwan.
When several Taiwanese entertainers posted on Chinese social media platforms their endorsements of China’s illegal claims to Taiwan, the Mainland Affairs Council announced investigations into their conduct, raising the prospect of serious penalties for conspiring with Beijing to undermine Taiwan’s national sovereignty.
Yet while the issue of Taiwanese entertainers betraying their country is serious within Taiwan, it is of relatively low importance to the global contest of narratives over Taiwanese sovereignty. These entertainers, most of whom live and make their money in China, posted in Chinese on a Web site only used in China — the impact of the posts changed no minds over Taiwan’s sovereignty dispute. Absolutely no content is allowed anywhere on the Chinese Internet suggesting that Taiwan is anything but a Chinese province, and almost no one in China doubts that Taiwan belongs to China, a result of generations of brainwashing propaganda and falsified history.
Meanwhile, the global English-language Internet and media remain major sites of contest of narratives over Taiwan’s status.
If Lai is serious about combating China’s political warfare, then Taipei must not fail to confront Beijing’s attacks on the world stage. Taiwan’s banning of a major movie star would certainly make international headlines and convey to the world that Taiwan is a sovereign state whose people oppose annexation by China. An entry ban would confirm that Taiwan has control of its own borders, a fact China works hard to obscure and obfuscate through its disinformation campaigns.
Actors and celebrities would learn that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of China. These celebrities visit this beautiful country and profit off business opportunities here, but these privileges must be denied to those who seek to undermine the country’s very existence.
Fighting back against China’s use of its economic might to marginalize Taiwan is no easy feat, but it must be done on all fronts. The Lai administration must start by taking immediate action to ban Yeoh from the country.
Sasha B. Chhabra is a visiting fellow at the Institute for National Defense and Security Research in Taipei.
Labubu, an elf-like plush toy with pointy ears and nine serrated teeth, has become a global sensation, worn by celebrities including Rihanna and Dua Lipa. These dolls are sold out in stores from Singapore to London; a human-sized version recently fetched a whopping US$150,000 at an auction in Beijing. With all the social media buzz, it is worth asking if we are witnessing the rise of a new-age collectible, or whether Labubu is a mere fad destined to fade. Investors certainly want to know. Pop Mart International Group Ltd, the Chinese manufacturer behind this trendy toy, has rallied 178 percent
My youngest son attends a university in Taipei. Throughout the past two years, whenever I have brought him his luggage or picked him up for the end of a semester or the start of a break, I have stayed at a hotel near his campus. In doing so, I have noticed a strange phenomenon: The hotel’s TV contained an unusual number of Chinese channels, filled with accents that would make a person feel as if they are in China. It is quite exhausting. A few days ago, while staying in the hotel, I found that of the 50 available TV channels,
Life as we know it will probably not come to an end in Japan this weekend, but what if it does? That is the question consuming a disaster-prone country ahead of a widely spread prediction of disaster that one comic book suggests would occur tomorrow. The Future I Saw, a manga by Ryo Tatsuki about her purported ability to see the future in dreams, was first published in 1999. It would have faded into obscurity, but for the mention of a tsunami and the cover that read “Major disaster in March 2011.” Years later, when the most powerful earthquake ever
There is no such thing as a “silicon shield.” This trope has gained traction in the world of Taiwanese news, likely with the best intentions. Anything that breaks the China-controlled narrative that Taiwan is doomed to be conquered is welcome, but after observing its rise in recent months, I now believe that the “silicon shield” is a myth — one that is ultimately working against Taiwan. The basic silicon shield idea is that the world, particularly the US, would rush to defend Taiwan against a Chinese invasion because they do not want Beijing to seize the nation’s vital and unique chip industry. However,
RSS