This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics.
As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely.
The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more profound about our social fabric.
Our night markets, where families congregate amid sizzling food stands, and our office culture, where colleagues rarely eat alone, both reflect an instinctive prioritization of connection. While the report notes that dining alone is increasing in Japan and South Korea due to demographic shifts, Taiwan faces similar challenges, yet maintains its communal eating traditions, suggesting something distinctive in our social psychology.
Despite Taiwan’s transformation into a global technology powerhouse, our happiness does not primarily stem from material achievement. Research from Taiwanese academics reveals a more nuanced conception: happiness as a harmonious state balancing internal contentment with external relationships.
This reflects our cultural heritage, where Confucian, Taoist and Buddhist wisdoms have blended pragmatically. We have learned that controlling desires can be as important as fulfilling them.
Our economic development illustrates this balance. During Taiwan’s economic miracle, our society maintained remarkable frugality, despite growing prosperity. Even today, our spending often focuses on shared experiences rather than individual status symbols. Family trips to Taroko Gorge or Alishan typically hold more value than acquiring luxury items.
Perhaps most distinctive is Taiwan’s dialectical understanding of happiness. Rather than viewing happiness as a permanent state to achieve, our cultural tradition recognizes the ever-changing relationship between happiness and unhappiness — seeing them as interdependent opposites in continuous flux.
This perspective offers resilience when facing challenges. Taiwan’s history embodies this approach, transforming multiple periods of hardship into opportunity — from post-war poverty to democratization challenges, from economic restructuring to international isolation. Each challenge has been met not with despair, but with adaptation.
Even our approach to cross-strait tensions reflects this thinking. Despite persistent threats, daily life proceeds with remarkable normalcy and optimism. This is not denial, but an ability to hold contradictory realities simultaneously — acknowledging threats while refusing to let them dominate our collective consciousness.
An often overlooked dimension of Taiwan’s happiness is our remarkable social trust and civic participation. Our elections last year showcased not just political freedom, but a deep-rooted trust in democratic processes that transcends partisan divisions. The peaceful transitions of power, robust civil society and vibrant independent media all contribute to a sense of agency and collective ownership of our future.
During natural disasters and the COVID-19 pandemic, Taiwan’s community resilience shone through citizens’ voluntary compliance with necessary measures and spontaneous mutual aid networks. This was not merely government efficiency, but reflected deep social bonds and reciprocal trust. When masks were scarce early in the pandemic, people formed orderly lines, showing a collective understanding that surpasses mere rule-following.
These invisible social resources — what sociologists call “social capital” — create a buffer against life’s uncertainties. Knowing your community will rally during hardships provides psychological security that no insurance policy can match. This safety net of human relationships might be Taiwan’s most underrated happiness asset.
Taiwan’s happiness formula finds unique expression in our integration of traditional values with modern aspirations. Unlike societies that have rejected tradition for modernity, or those rigidly adhering to tradition, Taiwan has developed a more organic synthesis.
Our embrace of gender equality provides an example. Taiwan elected East Asia’s first female president and legalized same-sex marriage before any other Asian nation, yet these progressive achievements occurred without wholesale rejection of family values. Extended families still gather for festivals, maintaining intergenerational bonds while adapting to new social realities.
Similarly, alongside our world-class national health insurance system, traditional Chinese medical practices maintain legitimate standing. Many Taiwanese move comfortably between both approaches, pragmatically selecting what works rather than adhering to ideological purity.
Taiwan’s experience suggests that happiness emerges not from perfection, but from balance — between individual and community, tradition and innovation, material comfort and spiritual meaning. We have cultivated this balance not through grand theoretical frameworks, but through practical everyday wisdom.
The global mental health crisis demonstrates the inadequacy of purely material or individualistic conceptions of happiness. Societies with greater wealth and individual freedoms sometimes report declining well-being. Taiwan’s approach, emphasizing relational harmony alongside individual achievement, offers an alternative model worth consideration.
As Taiwan continues navigating between tradition and modernity, between East Asian heritage and global influence, perhaps our greatest contribution is not semiconductor chips or bubble tea, but this living laboratory of happiness — where ancient wisdom meets contemporary challenges, and where relationships still anchor our sense of well-being.
Rankings will change yearly, but Taiwan’s approach to happiness offers enduring value in our increasingly complex world — not because we have discovered a perfect formula, but because we have maintained our humanity amid the disruptions, disconnections or challenges that arise from the complexities and rapid changes of contemporary society.
Y. Tony Yang is an endowed professor and associate dean at George Washington University.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which