The recent termination of Tibetan-language broadcasts by Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) is a significant setback for Tibetans both in Tibet and across the global diaspora.
The broadcasts have long served as a vital lifeline, providing uncensored news, cultural preservation and a sense of connection for a community often isolated by geopolitical realities.
For Tibetans living under Chinese rule, access to independent information is severely restricted. The Chinese government tightly controls media and censors content that challenges its narrative. VOA and RFA broadcasts have been among the few sources of uncensored news available to Tibetans, offering insights into global events, human rights issues and Tibetan cultural preservation.
The cessation of these broadcasts leaves a vacuum, making it even harder for Tibetans in Tibet to access unbiased information. This could lead to increased isolation and a greater reliance on state-controlled narratives, further eroding the community’s ability to stay informed and connected to the outside world.
The Tibetan language itself is a cornerstone of Tibetan identity. VOA and RFA broadcasts have played a crucial role in promoting and preserving the Tibetan language, especially for younger generations who might not have access to formal education in their native tongue.
The loss of these broadcasts risks accelerating the erosion of linguistic and cultural heritage, a concern that resonates deeply within the Tibetan diaspora.
For the Tibetan diaspora, the broadcasts have been more than just a source of news, they have been a bridge to their homeland. Many in the diaspora rely on VOA and RFA to stay connected to the struggles and triumphs of their compatriots in Tibet. Discontinuing these services could weaken this connection, making it harder for the diaspora to advocate effectively for Tibetan rights and autonomy on the global stage.
The closure has also broader geopolitical implications. It signals a retreat in the US’ soft power efforts to promote democracy and human rights in regions under authoritarian rule.
By silencing these broadcasts, the US risks ceding influence to China, which has long sought to suppress independent Tibetan voices. The move could be interpreted as a concession to authoritarian regimes, undermining the credibility of US commitments to freedom of speech and human rights.
The termination of Tibetan broadcasts by VOA and RFA is not just a loss for Tibetans, it is a loss for the principles of free speech and cultural preservation. For a community already facing significant challenges, this development adds another layer of difficulty.
It is imperative that policymakers, activists and the international community work to find alternative ways to support Tibetan voices and ensure that the flow of uncensored information continues. The stakes are too high to let these voices be silenced.
Khedroob Thondup is a former member of the Tibetan parliament in exile.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS