The recent termination of Tibetan-language broadcasts by Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) is a significant setback for Tibetans both in Tibet and across the global diaspora.
The broadcasts have long served as a vital lifeline, providing uncensored news, cultural preservation and a sense of connection for a community often isolated by geopolitical realities.
For Tibetans living under Chinese rule, access to independent information is severely restricted. The Chinese government tightly controls media and censors content that challenges its narrative. VOA and RFA broadcasts have been among the few sources of uncensored news available to Tibetans, offering insights into global events, human rights issues and Tibetan cultural preservation.
The cessation of these broadcasts leaves a vacuum, making it even harder for Tibetans in Tibet to access unbiased information. This could lead to increased isolation and a greater reliance on state-controlled narratives, further eroding the community’s ability to stay informed and connected to the outside world.
The Tibetan language itself is a cornerstone of Tibetan identity. VOA and RFA broadcasts have played a crucial role in promoting and preserving the Tibetan language, especially for younger generations who might not have access to formal education in their native tongue.
The loss of these broadcasts risks accelerating the erosion of linguistic and cultural heritage, a concern that resonates deeply within the Tibetan diaspora.
For the Tibetan diaspora, the broadcasts have been more than just a source of news, they have been a bridge to their homeland. Many in the diaspora rely on VOA and RFA to stay connected to the struggles and triumphs of their compatriots in Tibet. Discontinuing these services could weaken this connection, making it harder for the diaspora to advocate effectively for Tibetan rights and autonomy on the global stage.
The closure has also broader geopolitical implications. It signals a retreat in the US’ soft power efforts to promote democracy and human rights in regions under authoritarian rule.
By silencing these broadcasts, the US risks ceding influence to China, which has long sought to suppress independent Tibetan voices. The move could be interpreted as a concession to authoritarian regimes, undermining the credibility of US commitments to freedom of speech and human rights.
The termination of Tibetan broadcasts by VOA and RFA is not just a loss for Tibetans, it is a loss for the principles of free speech and cultural preservation. For a community already facing significant challenges, this development adds another layer of difficulty.
It is imperative that policymakers, activists and the international community work to find alternative ways to support Tibetan voices and ensure that the flow of uncensored information continues. The stakes are too high to let these voices be silenced.
Khedroob Thondup is a former member of the Tibetan parliament in exile.
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Last week, Nvidia chief executive officer Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) unveiled the location of Nvidia’s new Taipei headquarters and announced plans to build the world’s first large-scale artificial intelligence (AI) supercomputer in Taiwan. In Taipei, Huang’s announcement was welcomed as a milestone for Taiwan’s tech industry. However, beneath the excitement lies a significant question: Can Taiwan’s electricity infrastructure, especially its renewable energy supply, keep up with growing demand from AI chipmaking? Despite its leadership in digital hardware, Taiwan lags behind in renewable energy adoption. Moreover, the electricity grid is already experiencing supply shortages. As Taiwan’s role in AI manufacturing expands, it is critical that
RSS