The recent termination of Tibetan-language broadcasts by Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) is a significant setback for Tibetans both in Tibet and across the global diaspora.
The broadcasts have long served as a vital lifeline, providing uncensored news, cultural preservation and a sense of connection for a community often isolated by geopolitical realities.
For Tibetans living under Chinese rule, access to independent information is severely restricted. The Chinese government tightly controls media and censors content that challenges its narrative. VOA and RFA broadcasts have been among the few sources of uncensored news available to Tibetans, offering insights into global events, human rights issues and Tibetan cultural preservation.
The cessation of these broadcasts leaves a vacuum, making it even harder for Tibetans in Tibet to access unbiased information. This could lead to increased isolation and a greater reliance on state-controlled narratives, further eroding the community’s ability to stay informed and connected to the outside world.
The Tibetan language itself is a cornerstone of Tibetan identity. VOA and RFA broadcasts have played a crucial role in promoting and preserving the Tibetan language, especially for younger generations who might not have access to formal education in their native tongue.
The loss of these broadcasts risks accelerating the erosion of linguistic and cultural heritage, a concern that resonates deeply within the Tibetan diaspora.
For the Tibetan diaspora, the broadcasts have been more than just a source of news, they have been a bridge to their homeland. Many in the diaspora rely on VOA and RFA to stay connected to the struggles and triumphs of their compatriots in Tibet. Discontinuing these services could weaken this connection, making it harder for the diaspora to advocate effectively for Tibetan rights and autonomy on the global stage.
The closure has also broader geopolitical implications. It signals a retreat in the US’ soft power efforts to promote democracy and human rights in regions under authoritarian rule.
By silencing these broadcasts, the US risks ceding influence to China, which has long sought to suppress independent Tibetan voices. The move could be interpreted as a concession to authoritarian regimes, undermining the credibility of US commitments to freedom of speech and human rights.
The termination of Tibetan broadcasts by VOA and RFA is not just a loss for Tibetans, it is a loss for the principles of free speech and cultural preservation. For a community already facing significant challenges, this development adds another layer of difficulty.
It is imperative that policymakers, activists and the international community work to find alternative ways to support Tibetan voices and ensure that the flow of uncensored information continues. The stakes are too high to let these voices be silenced.
Khedroob Thondup is a former member of the Tibetan parliament in exile.
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
RSS