Newly sworn in Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Legislator-at-large Liu Shu-pin (劉書彬) — who replaced former TPP legislator-at-large Wu Chun-cheng (吳春城) following his resignation — on Monday questioned a National Science and Technology Council official about Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s investments in the US and its core chip manufacturing technologies. However, she consistently misspoke throughout her inquiry, saying meter (米) instead of nanometer (奈米).
When reporters attempted to ask her about the mistake, Liu said: “I was just speaking too quickly. You didn’t hear me clearly.”
I happened to be eating lunch at a street stall when I saw the report on the news the following day. I nearly spit out my food.
Liu was actually speaking quite clearly. She said “meter” — and not very quickly, either. From her debut, it was evident that this legislator-at-large had not done her homework, and that lying comes quite easy to her — is this the kind of lawmaker that the TPP carefully selected as Wu’s replacement?
If Liu were a member of a different party, there is no doubt that former TPP chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) would have criticized her no end, calling her anything from a cockroach to a rat.
Some lawmakers benefit from the public’s resources, yet live in their own bubbles, completely oblivious to the costs we bear while using our livelihoods to accomplish nothing. It is truly disappointing.
This kind of figure will only harm the TPP’s reputation further — the original video went viral and garnered online mockery, with comments such as “a chip that large ... are they going to carve it with a plow?”
Liu has already become a laughingstock.
Fang Fu-chuan is an international trader.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS