A few days ago, a hospital system in northern Taiwan said hackers from the Crazy Hunter ransomware group attacked their patient data systems, not only taking more than 500 computers offline, but also stealing 16.6 million documents containing personal data. Afterward, the hackers peddled the data to a criminal ring for US$100,000.
Government agencies immediately demanded that hospitals boost their internal control mechanisms. They also reminded the public to be aware of possibly leaked personal information and urged all sectors to bolster data security and protections.
IT security is not just a matter of corporate responsibility, but concerns the public’s privacy as well, touching upon network security and data maintenance for vital public utilities and services. If we fail to respond properly, the problem could metastasize into a major breach of national security, turning into an invisible imminent threat.
A few days ago, the Association of Chinese Police Research convened a seminar to discuss the governance models the Australian government uses for handling fraud and network security. Network security governance was specifically brought up in the seminar. It is not just an important means of fighting fraud — it is a cornerstone of protections at the national security level.
Studies suggest that North Korea is a source of some ransomware used in attacks on large companies where embedded software siphoned off data, then throttled company computer systems to a halt.
Taiwanese corporations have increased their defenses and established more refined contingencies to fend off network attacks, and system throttling and paralysis. However, during the theft of US$1.5 billion of etherium on the Bybit cryptocurrency exchange platform during a routine transfer, Bybit’s multisignature mechanisms were infiltrated through social engineering. The hackers directly stole digital assets and continue to sell stolen private data to criminal rings.
However, cybercriminals have begun shifting away from that pattern of infiltration. Academics are proposing that the thinking behind crime policy no longer be solely centered on avoiding system paralysis, not paying ransoms or reminding the public to be aware of malicious software — the truth is that we must all pay attention to changes and trends in tech crime at all times.
To tackle online crime, Canberra established the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission, as well as the Australian Cyber Security Centre, and online reporting and case systems.
In the past, the Australian government classified frequently targeted victims of criminal groups into four tiers: government and related agencies; large transnational corporations; small and medium-sized businesses; and individuals. That has been simplified by combining the two business categories. Australia on Feb. 13 passed the world’s first innovative proactive prevention law, the Scams Prevention Framework. The framework made it mandatory for measures to be enforced in industries with high concentrations of fraudulent activity. It also includes codified comprehensive laws and regulations that businesses must follow.
To effectively fight against fraud, Australia temporarily put aside its anti-fraud task force and authorized the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission to act as the lead body with the primary responsibility of directing anti-fraud activities. Since the commission closely monitors whether regulated entities are complying with the prevention, detection, deterrence, response and documentation of fraud, it could hopefully clamp down on invisible imminent threats. The framework’s further development is worth the attention of government agencies and corporations.
Samuel Lin is an assistant professor at the Central Police University.
Translated by Tim Smith
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS