The Mainland Affairs Council is set to conduct an investigation into a Taiwanese artist who has taken an overtly pro-Beijing stance, claiming that Taiwan’s only name in the UN is “Taiwan, Province of China.” The council ought to be praised for its decision.
In the past, Taiwanese artists who made their careers in China have made statements each year congratulating China during its national day celebrations or by making statements such as: “I am Chinese” and “both sides [of the Taiwan Strait] are the same,” but they had yet to cross beyond the protective scope of freedom of speech and expression. They were simply denying the existence of the Republic of China, Taiwan, and engaging with a hostile state and harming our national interests.
Article 33-1, Paragraph 1 of the Act Governing Relations Between People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例) states that “unless permitted by each competent authorities concerned, no individual, juristic person, organization or other institution of the Taiwan Area may engage in any of the following activities: 1. Any form of cooperative activity with the agencies, institutions or organizations of the Mainland Area which are political parties, the military, the administration or of any political nature, or which are involved in any political work against Taiwan or affect national security or interests.”
Article 90-2 of the act states that those who contravene the act could face a fine of not less than NT$100,000 (US$3,026), but not more than NT$500,000, and could face further fines.
Consequently, if Taiwanese artists go along with Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi’s (王毅) proclamation distorting UN Resolution 2758, stating that “the only reference to the Taiwan region in the UN is Taiwan, Province of China,” they are involving themselves with the Chinese Communist Party government and military, and contravening the act.
Taiwanese artists who parrot or identify with Wang’s statements — essentially diminishing Taiwan or agreeing with its destruction — were born in Taiwan and enjoy the benefits conferred to them as citizens, yet are singing the Chinese Communist Party’s tune and denying our national existence.
The council should continue to harden its stance and vigorously implement the law, and perhaps go as far as to revoke the citizenship of such people. They should not be able to take part in our national health care system or obtain social benefits while disparaging the nation and advocating its demise.
Yeh Yu-cheng is a secretary at the Pingtung County Public Health Bureau.
Translated by Tim Smith
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS