The Mainland Affairs Council is set to conduct an investigation into a Taiwanese artist who has taken an overtly pro-Beijing stance, claiming that Taiwan’s only name in the UN is “Taiwan, Province of China.” The council ought to be praised for its decision.
In the past, Taiwanese artists who made their careers in China have made statements each year congratulating China during its national day celebrations or by making statements such as: “I am Chinese” and “both sides [of the Taiwan Strait] are the same,” but they had yet to cross beyond the protective scope of freedom of speech and expression. They were simply denying the existence of the Republic of China, Taiwan, and engaging with a hostile state and harming our national interests.
Article 33-1, Paragraph 1 of the Act Governing Relations Between People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例) states that “unless permitted by each competent authorities concerned, no individual, juristic person, organization or other institution of the Taiwan Area may engage in any of the following activities: 1. Any form of cooperative activity with the agencies, institutions or organizations of the Mainland Area which are political parties, the military, the administration or of any political nature, or which are involved in any political work against Taiwan or affect national security or interests.”
Article 90-2 of the act states that those who contravene the act could face a fine of not less than NT$100,000 (US$3,026), but not more than NT$500,000, and could face further fines.
Consequently, if Taiwanese artists go along with Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi’s (王毅) proclamation distorting UN Resolution 2758, stating that “the only reference to the Taiwan region in the UN is Taiwan, Province of China,” they are involving themselves with the Chinese Communist Party government and military, and contravening the act.
Taiwanese artists who parrot or identify with Wang’s statements — essentially diminishing Taiwan or agreeing with its destruction — were born in Taiwan and enjoy the benefits conferred to them as citizens, yet are singing the Chinese Communist Party’s tune and denying our national existence.
The council should continue to harden its stance and vigorously implement the law, and perhaps go as far as to revoke the citizenship of such people. They should not be able to take part in our national health care system or obtain social benefits while disparaging the nation and advocating its demise.
Yeh Yu-cheng is a secretary at the Pingtung County Public Health Bureau.
Translated by Tim Smith
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Keelung Mayor George Hsieh (謝國樑) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on Tuesday last week apologized over allegations that the former director of the city’s Civil Affairs Department had illegally accessed citizens’ data to assist the KMT in its campaign to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) councilors. Given the public discontent with opposition lawmakers’ disruptive behavior in the legislature, passage of unconstitutional legislation and slashing of the central government’s budget, civic groups have launched a massive campaign to recall KMT lawmakers. The KMT has tried to fight back by initiating campaigns to recall DPP lawmakers, but the petition documents they
A recent scandal involving a high-school student from a private school in Taichung has reignited long-standing frustrations with Taiwan’s increasingly complex and high-pressure university admissions system. The student, who had successfully gained admission to several prestigious medical schools, shared their learning portfolio on social media — only for Internet sleuths to quickly uncover a falsified claim of receiving a “Best Debater” award. The fallout was swift and unforgiving. National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University and Taipei Medical University revoked the student’s admission on Wednesday. One day later, Chung Shan Medical University also announced it would cancel the student’s admission. China Medical
Construction of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County’s Hengchun Township (恆春) started in 1978. It began commercial operations in 1984. Since then, it has experienced several accidents, radiation pollution and fires. It was finally decommissioned on May 17 after the operating license of its No. 2 reactor expired. However, a proposed referendum to be held on Aug. 23 on restarting the reactor is potentially bringing back those risks. Four reasons are listed for holding the referendum: First, the difficulty of meeting greenhouse gas reduction targets and the inefficiency of new energy sources such as photovoltaic and wind power. Second,
RSS