Arkansas Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders recently announced a series of legislative measures to strengthen Arkansas’ defense against infiltration and influence by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
The Communist China Defense legislative package contains six bills that seek to target areas the CCP might use to infiltrate the US, such as through business, land acquisition and technology. By further tightening legal regulations, the bills would ensure that Arkansas’ security and economy are free from CCP influence.
This move aligns with a growing trend among US states in recent years to strengthen their own defenses against Chinese influence — in particular, reviews of key industries and land ownership, as well as collaboration with academic institutions, have become more stringent.
Some states have banned Chinese citizens or companies from purchasing agricultural land to prevent the CCP from using agricultural resources to gain control over the US food supply chain.
Many state governments have also increased scrutiny of tech companies with ties to China to prevent data leaks or cyberattacks on critical infrastructure.
The Arkansas legislation would not only directly counter CCP infiltration attempts, but also symbolizes that US states are adopting measures to protect their own interests independent of federal action. It also highlights that the CCP’s long-standing strategy of expanding its influence through economic and technological means has triggered increased vigilance and the implementation of countermeasures within the US.
It is worth watching to see whether Arkansas’ new legislation package becomes a model for other states to follow.
Elliot Yao is a reviewer.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which