Arkansas Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders recently announced a series of legislative measures to strengthen Arkansas’ defense against infiltration and influence by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
The Communist China Defense legislative package contains six bills that seek to target areas the CCP might use to infiltrate the US, such as through business, land acquisition and technology. By further tightening legal regulations, the bills would ensure that Arkansas’ security and economy are free from CCP influence.
This move aligns with a growing trend among US states in recent years to strengthen their own defenses against Chinese influence — in particular, reviews of key industries and land ownership, as well as collaboration with academic institutions, have become more stringent.
Some states have banned Chinese citizens or companies from purchasing agricultural land to prevent the CCP from using agricultural resources to gain control over the US food supply chain.
Many state governments have also increased scrutiny of tech companies with ties to China to prevent data leaks or cyberattacks on critical infrastructure.
The Arkansas legislation would not only directly counter CCP infiltration attempts, but also symbolizes that US states are adopting measures to protect their own interests independent of federal action. It also highlights that the CCP’s long-standing strategy of expanding its influence through economic and technological means has triggered increased vigilance and the implementation of countermeasures within the US.
It is worth watching to see whether Arkansas’ new legislation package becomes a model for other states to follow.
Elliot Yao is a reviewer.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
RSS