In front of a large crowd at a news conference during last week’s Chinese National People’s Congress and Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference — an annual gathering of the Chinese government known as the “two sessions” — Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) spoke about UN Resolution 2758.
Wang claimed that the resolution granted Beijing “the right to represent China,” and even proudly boasted that “the only official name for Taiwan recognized by the UN is Taiwan Province, China.”
The former statement is true, but the latter is the result of China buying influence over the UN. The first UN yearbook is proof of this. In 1947, Taiwan was technically still under Japan’s control, as the formal legal transfer of Taiwan’s sovereignty after World War II was still pending. Despite this, the 1946-1947 UN yearbook recorded “Formosa” as part of China’s territory. There is no other explanation for this other than that China had bought out the UN.
It was not until June 20, 1949, that the truth was revealed. Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) fled to Taiwan after the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) defeat by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Overcome with anxiety, Chiang sent a telegram to US general Douglas MacArthur — the supreme commander of the Allied Powers in the Far East at the time — pleading for assistance. In his message, Chiang requested he and the Republic of China (ROC) government be allowed to remain in Taiwan temporarily, as he and MacArthur opposed the spread of communism.
Chiang promised that the ROC would not permanently relocate its capital to Taiwan or seek exile there. This telegram was partially hidden from the Academia Historica Office and the KMT archives by former director of the National Palace Museum Chin Hsiao-yi (秦孝儀) to deceive the public.
Chiang’s promise not to permanently move the capital to Taiwan or go into exile demonstrates that he knew deep down that Taiwan did not belong to the ROC, and that the Cairo Declaration did not explicitly and legally grant the ROC sovereignty over Taiwan.
Wang also brought up the so-called legal basis for Taiwan’s “return” to China, claiming it was clearly stipulated in the Cairo Declaration. However, this is simply another one of Wang’s lies. Aside from the telegram from Chiang to MacArthur, which acknowledged that Taiwan did not belong to the ROC, then-US president Franklin D. Roosevelt and then-British prime minister Winston Churchill had reservations about China’s annexation of Taiwan. Therefore, the Cairo Declaration merely listed the return of Taiwan to China as a common “purpose” of the three countries — it was not a legal stipulation.
On Dec. 24, 1943, Roosevelt stated in one of his “fireside chats” — a series of 31 evening radio addresses — that one of the principles discussed with Chiang in Cairo was “the recognition of the rights of millions of people in the Far East to build up their own forms of self-government without molestation.”
Churchill, on the other hand, argued that Japan should give up control over Taiwan. Churchill also reiterated at a session of the UK Parliament on Feb. 1, 1955, that the Cairo Declaration was “merely a statement of common purpose” and that the San Francisco Peace Treaty signed in 1952 — also known as the Treaty of Peace with Japan — left the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty “undetermined.” This evidence can be accessed anywhere.
Wang’s tactics only succeed in deceiving ignorant reporters.
Sim Kiantek is a former associate professor of business administration at National Chung Hsing University.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
I came to Taiwan to pursue my degree thinking that Taiwanese are “friendly,” but I was welcomed by Taiwanese classmates laughing at my friend’s name, Maria (瑪莉亞). At the time, I could not understand why they were mocking the name of Jesus’ mother. Later, I learned that “Maria” had become a stereotype — a shorthand for Filipino migrant workers. That was because many Filipino women in Taiwan, especially those who became house helpers, happen to have that name. With the rapidly increasing number of foreigners coming to Taiwan to work or study, more Taiwanese are interacting, socializing and forming relationships with
Chinese social media influencer “Yaya in Taiwan” (亞亞在台灣), whose real name is Liu Zhenya (劉振亞), made statements advocating for “reunifying Taiwan [with China] through military force.” After verifying that Liu did indeed make such statements, the National Immigration Agency revoked her dependency-based residency permit. She must now either leave the country voluntarily or be deported. Operating your own page and becoming an influencer require a certain amount of support and user traffic. You must successfully gain approval for your views and attract an audience. Although Liu must leave the country, I cannot help but wonder how many more “Yayas” are still
Earlier signs suggest that US President Donald Trump’s policy on Taiwan is set to move in a more resolute direction, as his administration begins to take a tougher approach toward America’s main challenger at the global level, China. Despite its deepening economic woes, China continues to flex its muscles, including conducting provocative military drills off Taiwan, Australia and Vietnam recently. A recent Trump-signed memorandum on America’s investment policy was more about the China threat than about anything else. Singling out the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as a foreign adversary directing investments in American companies to obtain cutting-edge technologies, it said
The recent termination of Tibetan-language broadcasts by Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) is a significant setback for Tibetans both in Tibet and across the global diaspora. The broadcasts have long served as a vital lifeline, providing uncensored news, cultural preservation and a sense of connection for a community often isolated by geopolitical realities. For Tibetans living under Chinese rule, access to independent information is severely restricted. The Chinese government tightly controls media and censors content that challenges its narrative. VOA and RFA broadcasts have been among the few sources of uncensored news available to Tibetans, offering insights
RSS