In front of a large crowd at a news conference during last week’s Chinese National People’s Congress and Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference — an annual gathering of the Chinese government known as the “two sessions” — Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) spoke about UN Resolution 2758.
Wang claimed that the resolution granted Beijing “the right to represent China,” and even proudly boasted that “the only official name for Taiwan recognized by the UN is Taiwan Province, China.”
The former statement is true, but the latter is the result of China buying influence over the UN. The first UN yearbook is proof of this. In 1947, Taiwan was technically still under Japan’s control, as the formal legal transfer of Taiwan’s sovereignty after World War II was still pending. Despite this, the 1946-1947 UN yearbook recorded “Formosa” as part of China’s territory. There is no other explanation for this other than that China had bought out the UN.
It was not until June 20, 1949, that the truth was revealed. Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) fled to Taiwan after the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) defeat by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Overcome with anxiety, Chiang sent a telegram to US general Douglas MacArthur — the supreme commander of the Allied Powers in the Far East at the time — pleading for assistance. In his message, Chiang requested he and the Republic of China (ROC) government be allowed to remain in Taiwan temporarily, as he and MacArthur opposed the spread of communism.
Chiang promised that the ROC would not permanently relocate its capital to Taiwan or seek exile there. This telegram was partially hidden from the Academia Historica Office and the KMT archives by former director of the National Palace Museum Chin Hsiao-yi (秦孝儀) to deceive the public.
Chiang’s promise not to permanently move the capital to Taiwan or go into exile demonstrates that he knew deep down that Taiwan did not belong to the ROC, and that the Cairo Declaration did not explicitly and legally grant the ROC sovereignty over Taiwan.
Wang also brought up the so-called legal basis for Taiwan’s “return” to China, claiming it was clearly stipulated in the Cairo Declaration. However, this is simply another one of Wang’s lies. Aside from the telegram from Chiang to MacArthur, which acknowledged that Taiwan did not belong to the ROC, then-US president Franklin D. Roosevelt and then-British prime minister Winston Churchill had reservations about China’s annexation of Taiwan. Therefore, the Cairo Declaration merely listed the return of Taiwan to China as a common “purpose” of the three countries — it was not a legal stipulation.
On Dec. 24, 1943, Roosevelt stated in one of his “fireside chats” — a series of 31 evening radio addresses — that one of the principles discussed with Chiang in Cairo was “the recognition of the rights of millions of people in the Far East to build up their own forms of self-government without molestation.”
Churchill, on the other hand, argued that Japan should give up control over Taiwan. Churchill also reiterated at a session of the UK Parliament on Feb. 1, 1955, that the Cairo Declaration was “merely a statement of common purpose” and that the San Francisco Peace Treaty signed in 1952 — also known as the Treaty of Peace with Japan — left the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty “undetermined.” This evidence can be accessed anywhere.
Wang’s tactics only succeed in deceiving ignorant reporters.
Sim Kiantek is a former associate professor of business administration at National Chung Hsing University.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Immediately after the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Justice Mission” exercise at the end of last year, a question was posed to Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal regarding recent developments involving the exercises around Taiwan, and how he viewed their impact on regional peace and stability. His answer was somewhat perplexing to me as a curious student of Taiwanese affairs. “India closely follows developments across the Indo-Pacific region,” he said, adding: “We have an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our significant trade, economic, people-to-people, and maritime interests. We urge all concerned
In a stark reminder of China’s persistent territorial overreach, Pema Wangjom Thongdok, a woman from Arunachal Pradesh holding an Indian passport, was detained for 18 hours at Shanghai Pudong Airport on Nov. 24 last year. Chinese immigration officials allegedly informed her that her passport was “invalid” because she was “Chinese,” refusing to recognize her Indian citizenship and claiming Arunachal Pradesh as part of South Tibet. Officials had insisted that Thongdok, an Indian-origin UK resident traveling for a conference, was not Indian despite her valid documents. India lodged a strong diplomatic protest, summoning the Chinese charge d’affaires in Delhi and demanding
Taiwan needs to step up efforts to protect its access to rare earths amid escalating geopolitical risks and global economic uncertainty, given that its export-oriented economy relies heavily on imports of the elements to produce electronics. Taiwan is not the only country facing pressure to secure stable access to rare earths — metallic elements used in artificial intelligence servers, smartphones, electric vehicles and military applications such as fighter jets — after China imposed an export licensing measure last year that threatened to cut off supplies. China is using its dominance in rare earths as a bargaining chip in its trade negotiatons
RSS