Last month, Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra visited China and met with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). The two leaders discussed several issues, including cross-border telecom fraud. Xi expressed his approval of the Thai government’s efforts to combat online gambling and telecom fraud, emphasizing that both countries should continue to bolster law enforcement, security and judicial cooperation to safeguard people’s lives and property.
However, the effectiveness of these measures is questionable — fraudulent activity continues to thrive along the Thai-Myanmar border and the number of people who have been affected is steadily rising.
Meanwhile, the Malaysia International Humanitarian Organisation (MHO) on Feb. 12 organized a peaceful petition in front of the Thai embassy in Malaysia, where the family members of more than 50 people taken by human traffickers called on the Thai government to assist in rescuing Malaysians trapped in scam operations in Myanmar.
The MHO says that the majority of the people taken are lured into traveling to the Thai border before being transferred to scam compounds in Myanmar or Laos.
More than 99 percent of the masterminds behind the scammer organizations are Chinese, it says.
That echoes several external reports highlighting that many core operators of cross-border scammer organizations are from China, particularly those in the Kokan region of Myanmar’s Shan State, a region ruled by the “four big families” — Bai (白), Wei (魏), Liu (劉) and Ming (明) — who have established large-scale scam compounds.
Using internal Chinese networks, they attract and recruit people to cross the border for work, only to use them as slave labor for their scammer organizations — some are even subjected to abuse or trafficking.
The Thai government has recently launched several measures in response, including cutting off power supplies in some border areas to weaken the operational capabilities of scam sites.
However, collaboration between scammer organizations and local armed rebel groups has led to significant obstacles for cross-border law enforcement operations and limited the effectiveness of their efforts to combat scams.
As the governments of Thailand, Myanmar, Malaysia and China face increasingly severe challenges, curbing fraud and human trafficking through international cooperation has become a critical issue in regional security.
Elliot Yao is a reviewer.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS