As an alumnus of National Tsing Hua University (NTHU), I am deeply concerned about the recent fiasco regarding a promised donation to the university by United Microelectronics Corp (UMC) founder Robert Tsao (曹興誠).
Although UMC has donated NT$120 million (US$3.65 million) to NTHU for the building of the “Electrical Information Hall” (later named the Liu Jiong Lang Hall), and NT$100 million to convert the Activity Center into the Junshan Concert Hall under Tsao’s auspices, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Weng Hsiao-ling (翁曉玲) accused Tsao of forfeiting a promise to donate NT$15 million.
Even though the payment was not in the form of his own personal check, Tsao maintained that NTHU did receive the money, as was also confirmed in 2011 by then-NTHU president Chen Lih-juann (陳力俊), and widely reported in the news media at the time. However, Chen now denies this. Either the young Chen or the old Chen was incorrect.
Tsao questioned how Chen could betray him so easily when UMC had helped NTHU so much, going so far as to ponder whether “the prestigious NTHU has degenerated into a united front for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)?” That is referring to his current prominent role in leading the recall movement against many KMT legislators who are considered CCP sympathizers and who have passed legislations against Taiwan’s interest.
The current NTHU president has refused to dispel the confusion, saying it was to protect the names and privacy of donors. That could be an important criterion and a fair policy under the normal circumstances. However, the current case goes beyond privacy, as it has become a public issue.
Given its academic excellence and leadership, NTHU needs to promote truth in every corner of society. Besides, the relevant information is readily available.
Weng has openly proclaimed that the Republic of China (ROC) Constitution is invalid and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has the right to take over Taiwan. She is in effect denying the legitimacy of her own status as a legislator granted under the ROC Constitution.
Given that the PRC does not even have a mandate to govern China, as the Chinese had never voted to give their approval, the mere suggestion to let an authoritarian country take over a democratic country makes her a laughingstock in the academic world.
Her illogical thinking and poor scholarship raises questions about her qualifications as an associate professor at NTHU.
China had undergone dynastic upheavals every few hundred years, causing war and poverty. The CCP, in power for less than 100 years, already had the Cultural Revolution with rioting Red Guards; the Tiananmen Square Massacre with at least 10,000 people killed; and White Guards during the COVID-19 pandemic causing an economic meltdown.
The unemployment rate among young people is now as high as 40 to 50 percent, with some left homeless. The vicious cycle of public suffering will continue if China’s political system remains authoritarian. Tsao, who recognizes the shortcomings of nationalism and stands up for democracy, the right choice for both Taiwan and China, should be commended and not insulted.
Weng has done enough damage to NTHU’s reputation. The university’s “ostrich” approach to the issue would cause further harm, as the disrespect to its most generous donor would erode the trust of alumni and others in pledging donations.
Moreover, if the president of the university could not tell the truth, how would the university teach students to tell the truth? NTHU owes the public the truth.
James J. Y. Hsu is a retired professor of theoretical physics.
There has been much catastrophizing in Taiwan recently about America becoming more unreliable as a bulwark against Chinese pressure. Some of this has been sparked by debates in Washington about whether the United States should defend Taiwan in event of conflict. There also were understandable anxieties about whether President Trump would sacrifice Taiwan’s interests for a trade deal when he sat down with President Xi (習近平) in late October. On top of that, Taiwan’s opposition political leaders have sought to score political points by attacking the Lai (賴清德) administration for mishandling relations with the United States. Part of this budding anxiety
The diplomatic dispute between China and Japan over Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s comments in the Japanese Diet continues to escalate. In a letter to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, China’s UN Ambassador Fu Cong (傅聰) wrote that, “if Japan dares to attempt an armed intervention in the cross-Strait situation, it would be an act of aggression.” There was no indication that Fu was aware of the irony implicit in the complaint. Until this point, Beijing had limited its remonstrations to diplomatic summonses and weaponization of economic levers, such as banning Japanese seafood imports, discouraging Chinese from traveling to Japan or issuing
On Nov. 8, newly elected Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) and Vice Chairman Chi Lin-len (季麟連) attended a memorial for White Terror era victims, during which convicted Chinese Communist Party (CCP) spies such as Wu Shi (吳石) were also honored. Cheng’s participation in the ceremony, which she said was part of her efforts to promote cross-strait reconciliation, has trapped herself and her party into the KMT’s dark past, and risks putting the party back on its old disastrous road. Wu, a lieutenant general who was the Ministry of National Defense’s deputy chief of the general staff, was recruited
Tokyo-Beijing relations have been rapidly deteriorating over the past two weeks as China tries to punish Japan over Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s remarks about Taiwan earlier this month, and the off-ramp to this conflict is yet to be seen. Takaichi saying that a “Taiwan contingency” could cause a “situation threatening Japan’s survival” — which would allow Japan to act in self-defense — has drawn Beijing’s ire and sparked retaliatory measures. Her remark did not gain public attention until Chinese Consul General in Osaka Xue Jian (薛劍) made an apparent threat to behead her. The two sides lodged protests against each
RSS