In an eloquently written piece published on Sunday, French-Taiwanese education and policy consultant Ninon Godefroy presents an interesting take on the Taiwanese character, as viewed from the eyes of an — at least partial — outsider. She muses that the non-assuming and quiet efficiency of a particularly Taiwanese approach to life and work is behind the global success stories of two very different Taiwanese institutions: Din Tai Fung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC).
Godefroy said that it is this “humble” approach that endears the nation to visitors, over and above any big ticket attractions that other countries may have to offer, such as an Eiffel Tower or majestic, mysterious pyramids.
Most people hear about Taiwan in relation to China, and the potential of an invasion, she added.
Godefroy has a point about how the geopolitical noise surrounding Taiwan crowds out any other news about the nation and what it can offer. A case in point is a new episode of the weekly investigative report show Enquete Exclusive broadcast on the private national French television channel M6, focusing on the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) activity in the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait. The second half of the report turns its attention to how in Taiwan the threat of invasion looms larger than ever, and how the Taiwanese are in a state of permanent alert.
It is difficult to maintain a sense of permanent alert on a personal level when the threat has been part of the fabric of everyday existence for decades.
Wenzao Ursaline University of Languages student Huang Chieh-hsuan (黃婕晅), writing in the article “The Gen Z perspective on China and Taiwan” published in the Taipei Times on May 11 last year, said that she first heard about the possibility of an invasion by China when she was six, but that “after 18 years, the invasion news tastes like a sandwich I eat every morning.”
The Taiwan that Godefroy knows and Huang lives in is largely unknown to people in other countries, because of the noise.
The CCP has been very effective in dominating the discourse on what Taiwan is and how it fits in with the world. This narrative has changed during, and in the aftermath of, the COVID-19 pandemic, when the threat the CCP presents to world peace and prosperity became more apparent with false reporting of the virus and of attempts to control supply chains.
With this, TSMC became central to the discourse over chip manufacturing and supply chain security. The company remains front and center of the news cycle in Taiwan, with news of its planned US$100 billion investment in the US. The US Congress, parliamentary groups and think tanks working to support Taiwan and keep non-official channels between governments open and to counter the CCP’s distortions can, to a certain extent, mitigate the CCP’s domination of the discourse.
Another way to circumvent the CCP-induced diplomatic isolation is to find creative alternatives to advocacy and action on the world stage, with UN research fellow Jack Huang (黃一展) writing today on how young Taiwanese, frustrated by lack of action on climate change and blocked from participation in international organizations, are forging new ways to have their voices heard on the international stage.
However, the question remains of how to bring awareness to the world of what Taiwan is, what makes it unique, what there is to celebrate about it.
That is, how does this all fit in with Godefroy’s experience of Taiwan, or the country that Huang Chieh-hsuan calls home? It is not all chips and geopolitical jeopardy, as anyone living in Taiwan knows: There is more depth to Taiwan and its culture. We need to find more effective ways to broadcast this to the world, and rise above the din.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS