When United Microelectronics founder and former CEO Robert Tsao (曹興誠) took on the role of leading the recall petition against Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Hsu Chiao-hsin (徐巧芯), her KMT legislative colleague, Weng Hsiao-ling (翁曉玲), accused Tsao of backing out of fulfilling a donation of NT$15 million (US$456,565) to National Tsing Hua University.
Tsao on Sunday issued a rebuttal that detailed the entire donation process, explaining that it was made in the name of the tech company he founded, and that ultimately, the truth is now out in the open. The issue here is not Tsao or his donation, but: Who got their hands on private donor data and leaked it to Weng, and the attempt at using behind-the-scenes “united front” tactics to discredit Tsao’s support for the petition to recall and unseat Hsu.
The source of Weng’s accusation that Tsao is untrustworthy because of a “missing” university donation was certainly not something Weng dreamed up herself, nor did they come to her in a dream as some sort of divine intervention or mystical telepathic calling.
The information likely came from one of the two following scenarios:
First, a staff member at National Tsing Hua University broke financial information and privacy laws and regulations by searching for Tsao’s donation record, but mistakenly thought the donation would have been a personal one made in Tsao’s own name. They then failed to find any record and provided such “lack” of information as ammunition for Weng, which paired well with the latest stage act in Weng and Hsu’s counterrecall saga.
Second, looking at how certain media outlets reported the issue, publishing articles saying that “Tsing Hua stated” and “Tsing Hua reiterated” not having received Tsao’s donation, but these outlets never specifically indicated which university department staff or spokesperson made the claims, nor did they verify the donation details.
If this is the case, there is a possibility that Weng and certain media outlets collaborated to spread disinformation in an attempt to destroy Tsao’s credibility and ruin his image as the leader of the recall petition against Hsu.
Information regarding personal donations falls under the scope of the Personal Data Protection Act (個人資料保護法). If someone at Tsing Hua University violated the law by hunting down Tsao’s donation history and provided it to Weng as ammunition in a defamatory campaign, they have contravened the law and should bear full responsibility for their actions.
If it was a deliberate attempt to spread disinformation, and they went out of their way to damage another person’s reputation or credibility, they are going to have to pay civil damages to Tsao.
Yeh Yu-cheng is a secretary at the Pingtung County Public Health Bureau.
Translated by Tim Smith
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
RSS