Tensions between the US and China continue to escalate, with the Taiwan issue at the heart of potential conflict.
The US-based RAND Corp think tank on Wednesday published a report titled Thinking Through Protracted War With China, which analyzed the forms a US-China war could take. The report envisions nine potential scenarios — ranging from proxy wars to direct conflict — two of which directly involve Taiwan.
In the first scenario involving Taiwan, China attempts to seize Taiwan through a naval blockade and launches an amphibious invasion. After the US intervenes, the armed conflict reaches a stalemate; both sides see catastrophic losses and are unable to achieve victory through military means.
As a result, US President Donald Trump orders symbolic attacks against targets on Chinese territory to demonstrate US resolve. China does the same in turn, striking targets in the US. With both sides lacking sufficient conventional power to decisively defeat the other, the war evolves into a “conflict of resolve.”
Washington and Beijing then use reusable missile systems to attack civilian infrastructure and cultural monuments to force concessions. While this scenario does not involve the use of nuclear weapons, it devolves into a protracted war of attrition.
Taiwan faces enormous pressure, its infrastructure damaged by airstrikes, with prolonged conflict posing challenges to its energy and material stores. To survive a protracted war of attrition, Taiwan must strengthen its anti-missile defense systems, enhance self-sufficiency and ensure continued support from allied nations, the report says.
The second scenario involving Taiwan is a Chinese air and maritime blockade aiming to force Taiwan into accepting unification. The US provides Taiwan with supplies via airlift — the scale surpassing that of the 1948 Berlin Airlift — and cooperates with allied nations to pressure China by blockading oil shipments entering the South China Sea, thereby weakening China’s economic and military capabilities. A low-intensity war of attrition begins, testing the military capabilities, economic resilience and strategic patience of all parties.
The report says that the key to Taiwan’s survival in such a scenario lies not only in military defense, but also in long-term resource supply and societal adaptability. If such a war drags on — whether through the weakening of military power or economic pressure — it could alter the strategic landscape of the Taiwan Strait, or even the globe.
Thus, Taiwan must strengthen its wartime supply capabilities and ensure self-sufficiency in order to handle a prolonged blockade, the report says.
The report indicates that, while the US has traditionally assumed that wars would end relatively quickly, the emerging strategic environment and changes in technology might lead to significantly prolonged armed conflicts.
If neither the US nor China holds an advantage in conventional military power, economic competition or strategic patience, the war could evolve into a protracted stalemate.
Neither the US nor China would be able to achieve a decisive victory in the short term, and the conflict’s duration could far exceed initial expectations.
Moreover, decisions made in the early stages of an armed conflict would have a profound impact on subsequent developments. Whether China attempts a blockade, the US chooses to airlift supplies, or both sides launch symbolic strikes on the other, all could cause the war to evolve into a protracted armed confrontation.
Advancements in technology are also changing the nature of warfare. The application of emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, uncrewed aerial vehicles and cyberwarfare would make future wars very different.
New technology would not only increase the duration of conflicts, but would also make them more difficult to predict. Against this backdrop, Taiwan must prepare by ensuring the adaptability of its defense systems to the challenges of modern warfare.
Through collaboration with allied nations and technological innovation, Taiwan can enhance its strategic resilience in the event of protracted conflict.
Liao Ming-hui is an assistant researcher at the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Keelung Mayor George Hsieh (謝國樑) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on Tuesday last week apologized over allegations that the former director of the city’s Civil Affairs Department had illegally accessed citizens’ data to assist the KMT in its campaign to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) councilors. Given the public discontent with opposition lawmakers’ disruptive behavior in the legislature, passage of unconstitutional legislation and slashing of the central government’s budget, civic groups have launched a massive campaign to recall KMT lawmakers. The KMT has tried to fight back by initiating campaigns to recall DPP lawmakers, but the petition documents they
RSS