Tensions between the US and China continue to escalate, with the Taiwan issue at the heart of potential conflict.
The US-based RAND Corp think tank on Wednesday published a report titled Thinking Through Protracted War With China, which analyzed the forms a US-China war could take. The report envisions nine potential scenarios — ranging from proxy wars to direct conflict — two of which directly involve Taiwan.
In the first scenario involving Taiwan, China attempts to seize Taiwan through a naval blockade and launches an amphibious invasion. After the US intervenes, the armed conflict reaches a stalemate; both sides see catastrophic losses and are unable to achieve victory through military means.
As a result, US President Donald Trump orders symbolic attacks against targets on Chinese territory to demonstrate US resolve. China does the same in turn, striking targets in the US. With both sides lacking sufficient conventional power to decisively defeat the other, the war evolves into a “conflict of resolve.”
Washington and Beijing then use reusable missile systems to attack civilian infrastructure and cultural monuments to force concessions. While this scenario does not involve the use of nuclear weapons, it devolves into a protracted war of attrition.
Taiwan faces enormous pressure, its infrastructure damaged by airstrikes, with prolonged conflict posing challenges to its energy and material stores. To survive a protracted war of attrition, Taiwan must strengthen its anti-missile defense systems, enhance self-sufficiency and ensure continued support from allied nations, the report says.
The second scenario involving Taiwan is a Chinese air and maritime blockade aiming to force Taiwan into accepting unification. The US provides Taiwan with supplies via airlift — the scale surpassing that of the 1948 Berlin Airlift — and cooperates with allied nations to pressure China by blockading oil shipments entering the South China Sea, thereby weakening China’s economic and military capabilities. A low-intensity war of attrition begins, testing the military capabilities, economic resilience and strategic patience of all parties.
The report says that the key to Taiwan’s survival in such a scenario lies not only in military defense, but also in long-term resource supply and societal adaptability. If such a war drags on — whether through the weakening of military power or economic pressure — it could alter the strategic landscape of the Taiwan Strait, or even the globe.
Thus, Taiwan must strengthen its wartime supply capabilities and ensure self-sufficiency in order to handle a prolonged blockade, the report says.
The report indicates that, while the US has traditionally assumed that wars would end relatively quickly, the emerging strategic environment and changes in technology might lead to significantly prolonged armed conflicts.
If neither the US nor China holds an advantage in conventional military power, economic competition or strategic patience, the war could evolve into a protracted stalemate.
Neither the US nor China would be able to achieve a decisive victory in the short term, and the conflict’s duration could far exceed initial expectations.
Moreover, decisions made in the early stages of an armed conflict would have a profound impact on subsequent developments. Whether China attempts a blockade, the US chooses to airlift supplies, or both sides launch symbolic strikes on the other, all could cause the war to evolve into a protracted armed confrontation.
Advancements in technology are also changing the nature of warfare. The application of emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, uncrewed aerial vehicles and cyberwarfare would make future wars very different.
New technology would not only increase the duration of conflicts, but would also make them more difficult to predict. Against this backdrop, Taiwan must prepare by ensuring the adaptability of its defense systems to the challenges of modern warfare.
Through collaboration with allied nations and technological innovation, Taiwan can enhance its strategic resilience in the event of protracted conflict.
Liao Ming-hui is an assistant researcher at the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
After thousands of Taiwanese fans poured into the Tokyo Dome to cheer for Taiwan’s national team in the World Baseball Classic’s (WBC) Pool C games, an image of food and drink waste left at the stadium said to have been left by Taiwanese fans began spreading on social media. The image sparked wide debate, only later to be revealed as an artificially generated image. The image caption claimed that “Taiwanese left trash everywhere after watching the game in Tokyo Dome,” and said that one of the “three bad habits” of Taiwanese is littering. However, a reporter from a Japanese media outlet
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
RSS