Actor Darren Wang (王大陸) is under suspicion of deliberately avoiding compulsory military service. Since this incident was exposed, nationwide attention has been placed on how the military service system can be reformed to prevent subsequent abuses.
With the return last year to one year of compulsory military service, instances of evasion — like Wang’s case — might become more widespread. Authorities should bolster investigations and impose stricter legal penalties to ensure fairness and equality in the military service system, thereby cultivating the mindset that everyone is responsible for protecting the nation and its citizens.
The practice of falsifying documents to evade military service is not a new issue. When I enlisted in 1982, I heard all about the methods being used at the time, such as deliberately gaining weight to meet the threshold for exemption or pretending to have severe myopia. Some people even spent large sums of money to purchase fake medical records, pretending to be mentally ill or severely injured to be exempted from service.
These actions undermine the very principle of fairness, encourage unhealthy trends and affect the overall combat readiness of the military — they create an unfair “one country, two systems” phenomenon in the military service system.
That being said, there are still those who choose to serve despite being eligible for exemption. During my time training at a military academy in New Taipei City’s Tucheng District (土城), I recall a fellow soldier who weighed more than 100kg and could have been exempted, but he resolutely reported for duty. During every drill, our superiors would tease him, saying things like: “Others would run away if they could, but you just threw yourself right into the trap.” However, that soldier stood firm in his principles and saw military service as his civic duty, which was truly admirable.
The Constitution stipulates that paying taxes, completing mandatory military service and receiving compulsory national education are all duties that citizens must fulfill. Authorities should therefore regularly review the standards for military exemptions, gradually raise the thresholds, and strictly investigate and crack down on illegal activities such as the falsification of medical records. They must also establish a more comprehensive mechanism for the organization of conscripts to ensure fairness in the military service system.
Tsai Jr-keng is a retired elementary-school principal.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS