Suspended Hsinchu Mayor Anne Kao (高虹安) was prosecuted for corruption involving legislative assistant fees during her tenure as a legislator. The court of first instance handed her a prison sentence of seven years and four months, but following an appeal, a High Court panel in the court of second instance ruled that the administrative assistant, overtime fees and other regulations of the Organic Act of the Legislative Yuan (立法院組織法) contravened the principle of legal clarity, generating sowing controversy over the constitutionality of such fees. The court paused its trial and sought a constitutional interpretation, but the Council of Grand Justices voted unanimously to not hear the case.
The Constitutional Court’s decision not to take up the case was roundly praised in public discourse online, with people commending it for its keenness and circumspect view, and for understanding that the pan-blue and white camps are trying to paralyze the judicial system with unnecessary cases.
Although Kao’s official duties as mayor were handed over to an interim mayor, the pausing of her trial did not stop her from making high-profile appearances at end-of-year banquets and other functions for the municipal government’s top officials, at which she gave remarks and received birthday wishes. She also attended meetings involving the city fire department, environmental protection bureau and other public offices. She even used the title “mayor of Hsinchu” when signing Lunar New Year couplets and red envelopes.
The Constitutional Court on Feb. 7 rejected the High Court’s request for a constitutional review. Despite this, the very next day, Kao attended the Hsinchu General Union’s Lunar New Year’s banquet, at which she made a public speech. She is obviously unfazed by the courts.
Right after she was initially prosecuted, Kao rushed to her assistants’ homes, demanding that they coordinate their responses to the prosecutors, promising them that “the judiciary would be dealt with.” This is why the prosecution’s response was to investigate whether she was tampering with evidence or the courts.
The High Court panel should recuse itself from Kao’s trial as it resumes — specifically the presiding “qipao-wearing” judge, Kuo Yu-chen (郭豫珍), who has insisted that the suspended corruption cases against former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and former vice premier Cheng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) move forward.
Sophia Lee is a member of the Taiwan Association of University Professors.
Translated by Tim Smith
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
When a recall campaign targeting the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators was launched, something rather disturbing happened. According to reports, Hualien County Government officials visited several people to verify their signatures. Local authorities allegedly used routine or harmless reasons as an excuse to enter people’s house for investigation. The KMT launched its own recall campaigns, targeting Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers, and began to collect signatures. It has been found that some of the KMT-headed counties and cities have allegedly been mobilizing municipal machinery. In Keelung, the director of the Department of Civil Affairs used the household registration system
RSS