Suspended Hsinchu Mayor Anne Kao (高虹安) was prosecuted for corruption involving legislative assistant fees during her tenure as a legislator. The court of first instance handed her a prison sentence of seven years and four months, but following an appeal, a High Court panel in the court of second instance ruled that the administrative assistant, overtime fees and other regulations of the Organic Act of the Legislative Yuan (立法院組織法) contravened the principle of legal clarity, generating sowing controversy over the constitutionality of such fees. The court paused its trial and sought a constitutional interpretation, but the Council of Grand Justices voted unanimously to not hear the case.
The Constitutional Court’s decision not to take up the case was roundly praised in public discourse online, with people commending it for its keenness and circumspect view, and for understanding that the pan-blue and white camps are trying to paralyze the judicial system with unnecessary cases.
Although Kao’s official duties as mayor were handed over to an interim mayor, the pausing of her trial did not stop her from making high-profile appearances at end-of-year banquets and other functions for the municipal government’s top officials, at which she gave remarks and received birthday wishes. She also attended meetings involving the city fire department, environmental protection bureau and other public offices. She even used the title “mayor of Hsinchu” when signing Lunar New Year couplets and red envelopes.
The Constitutional Court on Feb. 7 rejected the High Court’s request for a constitutional review. Despite this, the very next day, Kao attended the Hsinchu General Union’s Lunar New Year’s banquet, at which she made a public speech. She is obviously unfazed by the courts.
Right after she was initially prosecuted, Kao rushed to her assistants’ homes, demanding that they coordinate their responses to the prosecutors, promising them that “the judiciary would be dealt with.” This is why the prosecution’s response was to investigate whether she was tampering with evidence or the courts.
The High Court panel should recuse itself from Kao’s trial as it resumes — specifically the presiding “qipao-wearing” judge, Kuo Yu-chen (郭豫珍), who has insisted that the suspended corruption cases against former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and former vice premier Cheng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) move forward.
Sophia Lee is a member of the Taiwan Association of University Professors.
Translated by Tim Smith
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS