Last week, two US military vessels transited the Taiwan Strait for the first time since US President Donald Trump took office last month.
US Navy Commander Matthew Comer, a spokesman at the US Indo-Pacific Command, said that “the transit occurred through a corridor in the Taiwan Strait that is beyond any coastal state’s territorial seas,” and that “within this corridor, all nations enjoy high-seas freedom of navigation, overflight and other internationally lawful uses of the sea related to these freedoms.”
The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) uses terms such as “internal waters,” “territorial sea,” “contiguous zone” and “exclusive economic zone,” but the term “internal sea” is nowhere to be found.
On June 12, 2022, former Chinese minister of national defense Wei Fenghe (魏鳳和) said at the Shangri-La Dialogue, a major Asian security forum in Singapore, that “the Taiwan Strait is China’s internal sea.” His use of the term “internal sea” — which is not recognized by international law — evidently caused confusion and could mislead the audience.
An April 24, 2023, entry on the blog of political commentator HoonTing (雲程) said that the Taiwan Strait has long been declared a free passageway for all nations, unrelated to UNCLOS. The post refers to a decision by the Japanese Cabinet on July 16, 1895, which stated that the Strait is to be considered international waters.
The decision was made following the Triple Intervention of 1895, in which the Japanese Imperial Government —in balancing the demands of Russia, Germany and France — issued a declaration stating: “The Imperial Government examined the requests of the three governments and considered the interests of international commerce and hereby declare as follows: the Imperial Government recognizes that all portions of the Taiwan Strait should be a public channel, which does not pertain to Japan and does not fall under the jurisdiction of Japan. The Japanese Imperial Government also agrees that Japan should seek no cession of Taiwan and the Pescadores to other countries.”
The Treaty of Shimonoseki, the Treaty of San Francisco and the Treaty of Taipei (also known as the Sino-Japanese Peace Treaty) — signed in 1895, 1951 and 1952 respectively — all demonstrate that the Taiwan Strait has maintained its unchanging legal status as international waters.
Where did this unfounded phrase “internal sea” come from? Comer’s recent acknowledgement that the Taiwan Strait is “beyond any coastal state’s territorial seas” is a widely recognized fact supported by the historical record of the Japanese government’s 130-year-old declaration that the Strait is a public channel.
Chen Yi-nan is an arbitrator.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS