A migratory duck rarely seen in Taiwan drowned off New Taipei City on Saturday after becoming entangled in an abandoned fishing net. The death of the red-breasted merganser — one of five spotted this year off the city’s coast — prompted renewed concerns about marine waste in Taiwan’s waters.
Discarded fishing nets, fishing lines, plastic and other waste are dangerous to aquatic birds, whales, dolphins, sea turtles and other marine animals, said Huang Shu-ting (黃蜀婷), president of a bird-watching club.
“Today it is a red-breasted merganser, but tomorrow it could be a dolphin, turtle or other birds,” she said.
Fishing and aquaculture industries are major sources of the plastic waste that gets into the ocean, as fishers often lose or discard old nets and fishing lines. That waste often washes ashore, or marine life becomes entangled in it. Waste from single-use plastic consumer products also gets into the ocean after being improperly discarded or blown away from landfills.
The Ministry of Environment works with environmental organizations and coastal management authorities to lead beach cleanups and monitor waste along the coast. Cleanups are also organized by volunteer initiatives such as Taiwan National Clean Up Day, which has run annually since 2017. Such programs are good, but as they are infrequent, they cannot keep pace with the rapid accumulation of waste. The Ocean Cleanup Web site says that about 80 percent of plastic marine waste ends up ashore within a month of washing out to sea.
Banning production of plastic would eliminate plastic waste, but it is simply not feasible to live without any form of plastic in the modern world. At best, governments could mandate the use of alternatives such as bamboo or metal where possible, or plastics that are recyclable or biodegradable. It could also subsidize research into alternatives to commonly used plastics. Those changes would take time, and in the meantime plastics continue to be a threat to marine life. Plastic waste also affects human health when microplastics enter the food chain. That is a major concern, especially given Taiwan’s low birthrate, as microplastics can disrupt the reproductive system by reducing sperm count and motility, impairing ovulation, and causing placental dysfunction.
One solution to keep pace with the accumulation of marine waste is to deploy ocean-cleaning robots. Taiwanese ocean-cleanup initiative Azure Alliance proved the potential for such a solution when it tested its cleanup vessel the Azure Fighter in 2019. The remote-controlled vessel, which is in its third iteration, can collect more than 52 tonnes of waste in a year. The Azure Fighter could be modified to operate on its own using artificial intelligence (AI), which has been demonstrated by Hong Kong-based company Open Ocean Engineering with its AI-powered robot Clearbot. The study “Type and quantity of coastal debris pollution in Taiwan: A 12-year nationwide assessment using citizen science data,” published in the Marine Pollution Bulletin in October 2018, estimated that between October 2004 and December 2016, 500 tonnes to 1,000 tonnes of waste gathered on Taiwan’s coastline.
The government could help subsidize the mass production of ocean cleanup vessels and contract a Taiwanese manufacturer to develop the AI software. Even if only a few dozen robots were operating at any given time, it could greatly bolster the efforts of human volunteers, and the Ministry of Environment could even establish a division to monitor and clean beaches. A three-pronged strategy of reducing nonbiodegradable plastic production, recovering plastic waste and ramping up recycling of plastics could position Taiwan to be a regional leader on tackling marine waste. Such crucial efforts could save marine life and improve human health.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
RSS