The Cabinet and the legislature must collaborate to solve Taiwan Power Co’s (Taipower) financial problems to avert more electricity rate hikes from April after a NT$100 billion (US$3.1 billion) subsidy was cut. Further electricity price increases would add to Taiwan’s already high inflation and put more financial burden on people and businesses.
The cancelation of the funding for Taipower was part of the record-breaking budget cuts totaling NT$207.5 billion pushed through the legislature on Jan. 21 by opposition parties the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party. Another NT$100 billion added for Taipower’s 2024 budget plan was also removed. The funding is crucial for the state-owned utility to stay afloat, while keeping electricity rates steady, particularly for households. Taipower had accumulated NT$429.9 billion in losses as of the end of last year, as the company has been supplying electricity at prices below cost after global natural gas and coal prices soared following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. The utility’s net debt ratio has climbed to more than 90 percent, putting it on the brink of bankruptcy.
Taipower is scrupulous about price hikes to help stabilize inflation, although the costs of imported raw materials have been surging. Over the past three years, Taipower has increased electricity rates 66 percent for industrial users, but only 7.1 percent for the average household. The hikes were much slower than in most countries. South Korea raised electricity rates by 87 percent for industrial users and 49 percent for average household users during the three years ended on Dec. 31 last year, data provided by Taipower showed. The utility attributed massive losses to its low increases for households. It said it is losing NT$1 per kilowatt-hour. The company has absorbed NT$280 billion in losses from 2022 to last year supplying power to households, it added.
Without the NT$100 billion government subsidy, Taipower has to count on itself to improve its financial situation and to prevent insolvency. Raising electricity rates is one of the most effective approaches it has. To reach the break-even point this year, it would have to increase utility prices by at least 9 percent from April based on the company’s calculations. Unlike previous rounds of rate hikes, household users would not be exempted this time. The company expects its losses to widen further next year and in 2027, if it keeps power rates relatively flat for industrial and household users.
General Chamber of Commerce chairman Paul Hsu (許舒博) called on the government to work on a new budget to level off Taipower’s losses as electronics companies have been facing heavy utility costs, not to mention the public. He also said that higher power bills would boost inflation and make it difficult for the government to keep it below its 2 percent goal. Inflation was at about 2.66 percent last month, Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics data showed. Every 1 percent increase in utility prices for households would add 0.012 percentage points to the nation’s full-year inflation, the agency said. The effect would be greater — adding 0.026 percentage points — if the price increases apply to industrial users.
Hsu is one of the industrial representatives to the electricity price review committee. It is to discuss the power rates by the end of next month. Utility hikes should be a last resort, as that would create a lose-lose situation for Taiwan’s economy, people and businesses. The optimal remedy now appears to be a new budget plan from the Cabinet and a legislature willing to give up any political maneuvering to approve it to benefit everyone.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more