Nationwide mass recall campaigns by civil society groups targeting Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers continued last week, with the Central Election Commission (CEC) saying it had received 51 petitions to recall lawmakers as of Thursday last week. Most of the recall petitions target KMT lawmakers seen as “unfit” — passing controversial bills and slashing the government budget for unconvincing reasons — or are suspected of conspiring with the Chinese Communist Party to undermine Taiwan’s democracy and national security. In response, the KMT launched a “counterattack” to recall several Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers.
A poll by Mirror News on Thursday last week showed that 46.4 percent of the public support the recall movements, slightly surpassing those who disagree; 55 percent are dissatisfied with KMT lawmakers’ performances, 31.6 percent are satisfied and 73.8 percent said they would cast their vote if the recall petitions go into the final voting — suggesting that the campaign is gaining momentum.
Several renowned public figures have also stepped in to lead recall campaigns, including 90-year-old Hakka writer Lee Chiao (李喬), who petitioned to recall KMT Legislator Chiu Chen-chun (邱鎮軍). United Microelectronics Corp founder Robert Tsao (曹興誠) and musician Chu Yueh-hsin (朱約信) also became leaders of recalls for two KMT lawmakers in Taipei and New Taipei City.
Meanwhile, the Legislative Yuan on Tuesday last week rejected the Cabinet’s proposal to reconsider an amendment to the Public Officials Election and Recall Act (公職人員選舉罷免法) that tightens requirements for recall petitions. As the amended law is expected to take effect by the end of the month, the first phase of recall petition submissions is also expected to end and move to the second phase.
Amid heightened tensions, the KMT said it would focus on improving people’s livelihood in the new legislative session, but it failed to deliver the late budget to the Cabinet for approval, after it hastily passed third readings to cut it by more than NT$207.5 billion (US$6.33 billion) on Jan. 22. It is also aiming to push for another controversial bill — a national security strategy act — to take over the president’s authority over national security matters.
Throughout the civic groups’ recall movements, the KMT has not self-reflected nor listened to people’s concerns, but persisted in labeling them as part of the DPP’s “retaliatory power grab” and antagonizing them with more questionable actions, such as KMT Legislator Chen Yu-jen (陳玉珍) joining China’s Taiwan Affairs Office Director Song Tao (宋濤) in a Lunar New Year event in China’s Xiamen a day after the legislature slashed the government budget. Shortly after, she infuriated members of the cultural industry by implying they “beg for food” by receiving government funding.
However, some remarks and proposals by KMT lawmakers appear to indicate they are no longer unflappable and might be trying to stop the recall tide, including proposing to give out a universal cash payment of NT$10,000 to every citizen, a bill to suspend the phased-in reduction of civil servants’ and educators’ pension income replacement ratio, and a bill to restore seven days of paid leave for workers.
The KMT legislative caucus on Thursday last week also launched a campaign saying the DPP-led government would be spending an estimated NT$1.2 billion on recalls, and that the government would be using the second reserve fund, which should be for emergency disaster relief, for its “intra-party struggles” — disregarding the right of people to elect and recall, and reframing it as the DPP’s “vendetta” against the KMT.
Whether Taiwanese would accept the KMT’s claim is yet to be seen, but the recall “battle” is expected to heat up soon, as civic groups face a more challenging task of obtaining signatures exceeding 10 percent of their constituency’s voters in 60 days, while the KMT would certainly ramp up efforts to obstruct them.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS