A new wave of online discussion has emerged regarding the Ministry of Culture’s Culture Points cash handout program intended to encourage young people to engage in cultural activities.
The new model for supporting Taiwan’s cultural and creative industries is a quality policy that would encourage, promote and cultivate good reading habits among young people. Even if the points are not used to purchase books, they can be used to attend cultural and artistic activities.
The program should not be approached with an attitude of skepticism, imagining all the ways young people might choose to spend their Culture Points, nor should people absurdly question whether the points should be spent on books.
When a policy is first implemented, it should come complete with a set of supporting measures. To prevent some teenagers from spending their Culture Points on products or activities unrelated to culture and the arts, the target audience for the points should have been clearly defined from the start.
In response to those who have already raised concerns about the issue, the ministry should re-evaluate the situation. It must complete a thorough review and verify relevant businesses and other procedures before rolling out a newly adjusted policy.
As for some legislators’ recent obsession with cutting or freezing budgets related to culture and the arts — particularly those from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) — do they not want to support and encourage young Taiwanese to read?
KMT caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has a doctorate in international relations from Jinan University, while TPP Acting Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) holds a master’s degree and a doctorate in law from Cornell University. They both obtained advanced degrees, so is it not strange that they seem unwilling to help give the future leaders of our nation the opportunity to read?
Hung Yu-jui is a translator and Japanese-language teacher.
Translatedby Kyra Gustavsen
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
RSS