About 6.1 million couples tied the knot last year, down from 7.28 million in 2023 — a drop of more than 20 percent, data from the Chinese Ministry of Civil Affairs showed. That is more serious than the precipitous drop of 12.2 percent in 2020, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.
As the saying goes, a single leaf reveals an entire autumn. The decline in marriages reveals problems in China’s economic development, painting a dismal picture of the nation’s future.
A giant question mark hangs over economic data that Beijing releases due to a lack of clarity, freedom of the press and freedom of expression. Even former Chinese premier Li Keqiang (李克強) said that when he was Chinese Communist Party (CCP) secretary for Liaoning Province, he created his own reference model by looking at rail cargo volumes, electricity use volumes, bank loans and other data — not Beijing’s official economic indicators — to form a clearer and more accurate grasp of the province’s economic development.
Beijing still staunchly maintains that its official economic growth rate is above 5 percent, but an assessment of the economic situation among ordinary Chinese can be made by looking at the plummeting number of marriages. It is almost impossible to describe how dire the situation is.
It is not rocket science. People do not tend to get married if they do not have enough money and it is difficult to start a family without the ability to support one.
The most stinging aspect is that Chinese are living a miserable existence, yet the CCP is busy wasting resources on military adventurism against neighboring countries. Every day, it sends military aircraft and vessels to harass Taiwan, Japan and the Philippines.
If the CCP stopped wasting all of that money and instead used it to help young Chinese start families or set up businesses, it would be much more beneficial for them.
Would the CCP ever consider doing that?
Huang Tzu-wei works in public service.
Translated by Tim Smith
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
The central bank has launched a redesign of the New Taiwan dollar banknotes, prompting questions from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — “Are we not promoting digital payments? Why spend NT$5 billion on a redesign?” Many assume that cash will disappear in the digital age, but they forget that it represents the ultimate trust in the system. Banknotes do not become obsolete, they do not crash, they cannot be frozen and they leave no record of transactions. They remain the cleanest means of exchange in a free society. In a fully digitized world, every purchase, donation and action leaves behind data.
Yesterday, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), once the dominant political party in Taiwan and the historic bearer of Chinese republicanism, officially crowned Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) as its chairwoman. A former advocate for Taiwanese independence turned Beijing-leaning firebrand, Cheng represents the KMT’s latest metamorphosis — not toward modernity, moderation or vision, but toward denial, distortion and decline. In an interview with Deutsche Welle that has now gone viral, Cheng declared with an unsettling confidence that Russian President Vladimir Putin is “not a dictator,” but rather a “democratically elected leader.” She went on to lecture the German journalist that Russia had been “democratized