As artificial intelligence (AI) slop spreads across the Internet, concerns about the future of high-quality information are growing. Without accurate and relevant human-generated data, model collapse — whereby generative AI trains on its own output and gradually degrades — seems inevitable. The tech giants, well aware of that risk, have cut corners and skirted copyright law in their pursuit of training data for their large language models.
There is a simple solution: those large US companies could pay for the content they use, whether to develop generative AI or to keep social media users scrolling. Australia’s competition authority in 2021 issued a news media bargaining code requiring platforms to pay for the news from which they profit, which led many tech companies to reach voluntary deals with media organizations. When Meta (which owns Facebook and Instagram) failed to renew those deals last year, the Australian government updated the code to include a digital platform levy. Other countries are considering similar measures.
Europe has already taken steps in that direction. The EU’s Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market, which came into force in June 2019 and was to be transposed by member states into national law by June 2021, has provided a framework for securing fair compensation for European publishers.
Illustration: Yusha
In Denmark, that led to the creation in July 2021 of the Danish Press Publications’ Collective Management Organization (DPCMO). Representing 99 percent of the Danish news industry, from newspapers and magazines to digital outlets and public service broadcasters, the DPCMO has been authorized by the Danish Ministry of Culture to grant extended collective licenses. At first, we had the authority to conclude agreements on behalf of publishers regarding their rights (and neighboring rights) with search engines, social media platforms and news apps. In May last year, the mandate was expanded to include text and data mining by AI firms.
The DPCMO has successfully pushed some tech companies to negotiate collectively with publishers. Interim licensing agreements have been signed with all search engines on the Danish market, including Google, Bing, Yahoo and DuckDuckGo. We have also reached an agreement with Upday, Axel Springer’s news app.
However, other firms have been more obstinate. The DPCMO in April last year threatened to sue OpenAI if the company did not strike a group deal, as opposed to licensing agreements with individual publications. After OpenAI’s lawyer announced that further communication with the DPCMO would not be productive, we requested mediation with OpenAI, and Danish Minister of Culture Jakob Engel-Schmidt is expected to appoint a mediator soon.
Likewise, Apple refused to enter into an agreement with the DPCMO regarding its Apple News app. As a result, the DPCMO, together with the Danish Media Association, the Danish Rights Alliance and the Danish Union of Journalists, reported Apple to the police, saying that the app’s use of news content constitutes a copyright contravention. Apple ultimately made the app unavailable in Denmark.
Meta and ByteDance (which owns TikTok) said that their social media Web sites fall outside the scope of articles 15 and 17 of the EU’s Directive on Copyright, which provide new rules on content-sharing platforms, and subsequently refused to participate in mediation and arbitration with the DPCMO. Together with the Danish Media Association, we brought a complaint against Meta and ByteDance to the European Commission, saying that the firms have contravened the Digital Market Act’s data access regulations. The case is pending.
The reason for filing multiple lawsuits is to uphold EU copyright law, which serves as a crucial framework for regulating relations between the press and Big Tech. We have taken inspiration from the French competition authority, Autorite de la concurrence, which found that Google’s conduct in relation to its search engine and generative AI chatbot Gemini (formerly known as Bard) has prevented publishers from assessing and negotiating remuneration for neighboring rights and is thus an abuse of dominance.
In the second half of this year, Denmark is to assume the presidency of the Council of the EU, which holds agenda-setting powers. Given that one of Denmark’s priorities for the presidency is to rein in Big Tech, we urge Engel-Schmidt to lead an EU-wide effort to improve enforcement of the Directive on Copyright. One way to do that is to introduce a “final offer arbitration” mechanism, whereby arbitration is mandatory, and the arbitrator must choose one of the last offers presented by the parties, as Australia, Canada and the UK have done.
As Council of the EU president, Denmark must also focus on accelerating efforts to counter misinformation and disinformation, including deep fakes, and, relatedly, to improve media literacy. To that end, EU policymakers should seek input from ordinary citizens, not just experts. Rebuilding trust in the media ecosystem requires collective action and broad support.
Curbing Big Tech’s power over news outlets requires policymakers, civil servants, non-governmental organizations, academics, collective management organizations and youth activists to stand together. Perhaps more important, journalists, photographers and publishers must speak with one voice, so tech firms cannot divide and rule. If we want to preserve a free and pluralist press — an essential pillar of democracy — our time and energy should be spent fighting those massive companies, not each other.
Karen Ronde, a former member of the Danish Parliament, is CEO of the Danish Press Publications’ Collective Management Organization and a judge in the Danish Court of Impeachment.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
As the highest elected official in the nation’s capital, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) is the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) candidate-in-waiting for a presidential bid. With the exception of Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕), Chiang is the most likely KMT figure to take over the mantle of the party leadership. All the other usual suspects, from Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) to New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) to KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) have already been rejected at the ballot box. Given such high expectations, Chiang should be demonstrating resolve, calm-headedness and political wisdom in how he faces tough
RSS