In the face of a mass recall movement, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) told a Central Standing Committee meeting on Wednesday that the party would prioritize amending Article 23 of the Basic Environment Act (環境基本法) — changing its stated goal of achieving a “non-nuclear homeland” to a “carbon-free homeland” — during this legislative session.
He also said the KMT would propose an amendment to the Nuclear Reactor Facilities Regulation Act (核子反應器設施管制法) that would change the validity of an operating license from 40 years to 60 years.
However, the KMT’s wish is a political fantasy. Although there have undoubtedly been advancements in nuclear power technology, the use of nuclear fusion — a process where two atomic nuclei are combined — for power generation is still under development and has yet to be commercialized.
On the other hand, nuclear fission — the technique commonly used in nuclear power plants that involves breaking atomic bonds to release energy — causes major issues, because the high-level nuclear waste it generates is extremely difficult to handle and dispose of.
The “go nuclear to go green” policy that the KMT once promoted is just a political trick. Could it be that it is planning the same stunt all over again? Continuing to use nuclear power to achieve the goal of a “carbon-free homeland” without using materials such as coal, oil or natural gas is impossible.
The legislature’s review of the central government budget was conducted irrationally and unscientifically. Witnessing this deeply pained the public, sparking the recall wave efforts.
The recall movement is a reflection and expression of public opinion. The public has no desire to see political parties pushing deceptive policies with meaningless slogans — Taiwanese are wise, and their eyes sharp.
The shaping and promotion of public policies require political consciousness and wisdom, and should always be subject to public scrutiny. Changing the goal of a “non-nuclear homeland” to a “carbon-free homeland” is simply a political fantasy.
Chen Yi-nan is an arbitrator.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
China’s supreme objective in a war across the Taiwan Strait is to incorporate Taiwan as a province of the People’s Republic. It follows, therefore, that international recognition of Taiwan’s de jure independence is a consummation that China’s leaders devoutly wish to avoid. By the same token, an American strategy to deny China that objective would complicate Beijing’s calculus and deter large-scale hostilities. For decades, China has cautioned “independence means war.” The opposite is also true: “war means independence.” A comprehensive strategy of denial would guarantee an outcome of de jure independence for Taiwan in the event of Chinese invasion or
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) earlier this month said it is necessary for her to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and it would be a “huge boost” to the party’s local election results in November, but many KMT members have expressed different opinions, indicating a struggle between different groups in the party. Since Cheng was elected as party chairwoman in October last year, she has repeatedly expressed support for increased exchanges with China, saying that it would bring peace and prosperity to Taiwan, and that a meeting with Xi in Beijing takes priority over meeting
Taiwan no longer wants to merely manufacture the chips that power artificial intelligence (AI). It aims to build the software, platforms and services that run on them. Ten major AI infrastructure projects, a national cloud computing center in Tainan, the sovereign language model Trustworthy AI Dialogue Engine, five targeted industry verticals — from precision medicine to smart agriculture — and the goal of ranking among the world’s top five in computing power by 2040: The roadmap from “Silicon Island” to “Smart Island” is drawn. The question is whether the western plains, where population, industry and farmland are concentrated, have the water and
The political order of former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) first took shape in 1988. Then-vice president Lee succeeded former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) after he passed, and served out the remainder of his term in office. In 1990, Lee was elected president by the National Assembly, and in 1996, he won Taiwan’s first direct presidential election. Those two, six and four-year terms were an era-defining 12-year presidential tenure. Throughout those years, Lee served as helmsman for Taiwan’s transition from martial law and authoritarianism to democracy. This period came to be known as the “quiet revolution,” leaving a legacy containing light
RSS