Less than three weeks into his tenure, US President Donald Trump is governing at breakneck speed, making significant changes to US foreign policy, with governments around the world, both US adversaries and allies, scrambling to keep up.
Trump is ushering in a new modus operandi of the international order, one which easily discards norms and customs in the pursuit of national interest. This new approach brings opportunities and challenges for the US’ allies, including Taiwan. To advance its security and prosperity, Taiwan should be dexterous to ensure its interests align with the interests of Trump, the US and the wider democratic world.
The key to understanding Trump, New York Times columnist Ezra Klein wrote in October last year, is that he is disinhibited — he feels unconstrained by institutions, norms or customs.
This is “the engine” of his success and the source of his political strength, Klein wrote.
Trump can say and do what others cannot. This can be an asset for the US and its allies, but it can also bring challenges, not least for Taiwan.
Unconstrained by past practices, Trump could deepen Taiwan-US relations. For example, by selling weapons that the US has historically been hesitant to deliver. This was evidenced during his first term when he agreed to major military sales, including 108 M1A2 tanks, which were delivered at the end of last year, and 66 new F-16V jets.
These efforts set the tone of deepening US-Taiwan military cooperation and have greatly helped to bolster the nation’s long-term defense capabilities.
Trump could also help expand Taiwan’s meaningful participation in international organizations, which is important for the nation to engage in global diplomacy and foster relationships with other nations and international entities. Membership in economic organizations could give Taiwan greater access to markets, trade agreements and other economic opportunities, which would help bolster the nation’s resilience and prosperity, while also boosting US composite weight in international forums.
This would be a win-win for the US and Taiwan.
However, Trump’s willingness to do away with conventions could also pose challenges for Taiwan. His transactional approach to foreign policy means that values which have historically played a prominent role in the nation’s relations with the US might take more of a back seat. Taiwan must be attuned to this shift and work to show the value the nation brings to the alliance in terms of material power.
For example, the US has long called for Taiwan to prioritize military power and to boost its defense spending as a percentage of GDP. While Taiwan’s defense budget has increased 80.47 percent over the past eight years, it would still only account for about 2.45 percent of GDP this year.
Meanwhile, other small democracies facing even fewer existential threats are aggressively raising their budgets, such as Poland, whose defense spending is forecast to rise to 4.7 percent of GDP this year.
Therefore, the Trump administration might not be as patient as previous US administrations in terms of Taiwan’s defense spending.
In a new era of geopolitical flux, where a more transactional approach to politics might become the norm, the nation needs to come together and get on the same page on foreign relations and leave petty political squabbles aside.
Trump brings opportunities and challenges for Taiwan, and the nation should ensure it engages in deft diplomacy to align its national interests with the US and other democratic allies to safeguard collective security and prosperity, and meet its commitments as a responsible stakeholder in a new international order.
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
The central bank has launched a redesign of the New Taiwan dollar banknotes, prompting questions from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — “Are we not promoting digital payments? Why spend NT$5 billion on a redesign?” Many assume that cash will disappear in the digital age, but they forget that it represents the ultimate trust in the system. Banknotes do not become obsolete, they do not crash, they cannot be frozen and they leave no record of transactions. They remain the cleanest means of exchange in a free society. In a fully digitized world, every purchase, donation and action leaves behind data.
Yesterday, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), once the dominant political party in Taiwan and the historic bearer of Chinese republicanism, officially crowned Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) as its chairwoman. A former advocate for Taiwanese independence turned Beijing-leaning firebrand, Cheng represents the KMT’s latest metamorphosis — not toward modernity, moderation or vision, but toward denial, distortion and decline. In an interview with Deutsche Welle that has now gone viral, Cheng declared with an unsettling confidence that Russian President Vladimir Putin is “not a dictator,” but rather a “democratically elected leader.” She went on to lecture the German journalist that Russia had been “democratized
RSS