Less than three weeks into his tenure, US President Donald Trump is governing at breakneck speed, making significant changes to US foreign policy, with governments around the world, both US adversaries and allies, scrambling to keep up.
Trump is ushering in a new modus operandi of the international order, one which easily discards norms and customs in the pursuit of national interest. This new approach brings opportunities and challenges for the US’ allies, including Taiwan. To advance its security and prosperity, Taiwan should be dexterous to ensure its interests align with the interests of Trump, the US and the wider democratic world.
The key to understanding Trump, New York Times columnist Ezra Klein wrote in October last year, is that he is disinhibited — he feels unconstrained by institutions, norms or customs.
This is “the engine” of his success and the source of his political strength, Klein wrote.
Trump can say and do what others cannot. This can be an asset for the US and its allies, but it can also bring challenges, not least for Taiwan.
Unconstrained by past practices, Trump could deepen Taiwan-US relations. For example, by selling weapons that the US has historically been hesitant to deliver. This was evidenced during his first term when he agreed to major military sales, including 108 M1A2 tanks, which were delivered at the end of last year, and 66 new F-16V jets.
These efforts set the tone of deepening US-Taiwan military cooperation and have greatly helped to bolster the nation’s long-term defense capabilities.
Trump could also help expand Taiwan’s meaningful participation in international organizations, which is important for the nation to engage in global diplomacy and foster relationships with other nations and international entities. Membership in economic organizations could give Taiwan greater access to markets, trade agreements and other economic opportunities, which would help bolster the nation’s resilience and prosperity, while also boosting US composite weight in international forums.
This would be a win-win for the US and Taiwan.
However, Trump’s willingness to do away with conventions could also pose challenges for Taiwan. His transactional approach to foreign policy means that values which have historically played a prominent role in the nation’s relations with the US might take more of a back seat. Taiwan must be attuned to this shift and work to show the value the nation brings to the alliance in terms of material power.
For example, the US has long called for Taiwan to prioritize military power and to boost its defense spending as a percentage of GDP. While Taiwan’s defense budget has increased 80.47 percent over the past eight years, it would still only account for about 2.45 percent of GDP this year.
Meanwhile, other small democracies facing even fewer existential threats are aggressively raising their budgets, such as Poland, whose defense spending is forecast to rise to 4.7 percent of GDP this year.
Therefore, the Trump administration might not be as patient as previous US administrations in terms of Taiwan’s defense spending.
In a new era of geopolitical flux, where a more transactional approach to politics might become the norm, the nation needs to come together and get on the same page on foreign relations and leave petty political squabbles aside.
Trump brings opportunities and challenges for Taiwan, and the nation should ensure it engages in deft diplomacy to align its national interests with the US and other democratic allies to safeguard collective security and prosperity, and meet its commitments as a responsible stakeholder in a new international order.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The Hong Kong government on Monday gazetted sweeping amendments to the implementation rules of Article 43 of its National Security Law. There was no legislative debate, no public consultation and no transition period. By the time the ink dried on the gazette, the new powers were already in force. This move effectively bypassed Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. The rules were enacted by the Hong Kong chief executive, in conjunction with the Committee for Safeguarding National Security — a body shielded from judicial review and accountable only to Beijing. What is presented as “procedural refinement” is, in substance, a shift away from
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
RSS