US President Donald Trump’s inaugural speech centered around a “revolution of common sense” and pushed the concept of his “America First” policy to the extreme. For Taiwan, this not only illustrates Trump’s blueprint for US domestic affairs, but could also be the prelude to a drastic shift in the international order. It is crucial to pay close attention to the potential impact of upcoming US policy shifts on Taiwan’s economy, politics and national security.
Trump proposed a “revolution of common sense” to argue for the reform of the US’ internal systems, while his newly published “America First” priorities include goals to “drain the swamp” and “bring back American values.” In his address, Trump criticized the political ecosystem of former US president Joe Biden’s administration, referring to it as a “radical and corrupt establishment,” and vowed to restore the “integrity, competency and loyalty” of the US government.
Trump’s address emphasized a return to traditional US values: “As of today, it will henceforth be the official policy of the US government that there are only two genders, male and female.”
Trump has also called for renaming historical landmarks in line with “America First” values. While Trump is focused largely on US domestic affairs, his underlying ideology would influence the US’ international image and actions.
In his address, Trump also proposed significant adjustments to energy policy, stating that the US has “the largest amount of oil and gas of any country on Earth.”
Trump’s policies present massive challenges to global climate cooperation. In particular, his executive order to withdraw the US from the Paris Agreement for a second time would greatly weaken collective action on climate change.
The only direct mention of China in Trump’s address was in reference to the Panama Canal, which highlighted his tough attitude toward US-China relations. He criticized the decision to hand over the canal to Panama as “foolish” and indicated that China’s role in canal’s operations is unacceptable. He vowed to bring the management of the Panama Canal back into the hands of the US.
For Taiwan, this means that the Trump administration might exert further pressure on China, with the Panama Canal issue becoming a focal point for how the US counters and pressures China. Taiwan should closely monitor all actions the US takes in this area. China’s control of the canal could impact global shipping trade, while a US-China standoff over this issue would indirectly affect Taiwan’s position in the US-China dynamic.
Taiwan should watch closely to see if the US would use the Taiwan issue as leverage in negotiations with China over the Panama Canal. To prevent this, we must ensure our nation’s importance in the US’ Asia-Pacific strategy.
Trump also highlighted the return of the US as a “manufacturing nation” and implied more protective measures for the US automobile industry, which would likely alter the landscape of the global supply chain. His “America First” policy might lead him to adopt more protectionist trade measures, which could negatively impact Taiwan’s export-driven economy.
Behind Trump’s “revolution of common sense” are the US’ reflections on globalization, climate change and multilateral cooperation. These upcoming changes would profoundly impact the geopolitical and economic landscape of the Asia-Pacific region. While Trump’s policies might pose risks, they also present an opportunity for Taiwan to redefine its role on the international stage.
Liao Ming-hui is an assistant researcher at the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
China’s supreme objective in a war across the Taiwan Strait is to incorporate Taiwan as a province of the People’s Republic. It follows, therefore, that international recognition of Taiwan’s de jure independence is a consummation that China’s leaders devoutly wish to avoid. By the same token, an American strategy to deny China that objective would complicate Beijing’s calculus and deter large-scale hostilities. For decades, China has cautioned “independence means war.” The opposite is also true: “war means independence.” A comprehensive strategy of denial would guarantee an outcome of de jure independence for Taiwan in the event of Chinese invasion or
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) earlier this month said it is necessary for her to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and it would be a “huge boost” to the party’s local election results in November, but many KMT members have expressed different opinions, indicating a struggle between different groups in the party. Since Cheng was elected as party chairwoman in October last year, she has repeatedly expressed support for increased exchanges with China, saying that it would bring peace and prosperity to Taiwan, and that a meeting with Xi in Beijing takes priority over meeting
Taiwan no longer wants to merely manufacture the chips that power artificial intelligence (AI). It aims to build the software, platforms and services that run on them. Ten major AI infrastructure projects, a national cloud computing center in Tainan, the sovereign language model Trustworthy AI Dialogue Engine, five targeted industry verticals — from precision medicine to smart agriculture — and the goal of ranking among the world’s top five in computing power by 2040: The roadmap from “Silicon Island” to “Smart Island” is drawn. The question is whether the western plains, where population, industry and farmland are concentrated, have the water and
The political order of former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) first took shape in 1988. Then-vice president Lee succeeded former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) after he passed, and served out the remainder of his term in office. In 1990, Lee was elected president by the National Assembly, and in 1996, he won Taiwan’s first direct presidential election. Those two, six and four-year terms were an era-defining 12-year presidential tenure. Throughout those years, Lee served as helmsman for Taiwan’s transition from martial law and authoritarianism to democracy. This period came to be known as the “quiet revolution,” leaving a legacy containing light