It would be easy to look at headlines about the new UK government’s desire to boost economic and political cooperation with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and shake your head with wonder. How little time has passed since the failure of then-British prime minister David Cameron and Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) “Golden Decade.”
A government that is rightly concerned about the security implications of certain Chinese foreign direct investments into the UK should probably not go to Beijing to beg for more.
A government concerned about Chinese annexationist intrusions into the Philippines’ exclusive economic zone, well-documented human right abuses and the contempt displayed by the running of extra-legal Chinese police operations on UK soil, should probably not make China the center-piece of a strategy to boost the domestic economy and tackle climate change. On the surface, the present course of UK-China relations might not augur well for Taiwan-UK relations.
However, developments in Taiwan-UK relations last year reveal that, despite no major change to the UK’s core position on Taiwan, there were a few promising signs to indicate that the UK is starting to realize how important Taiwan is to UK interests.
In March last year, the UK House of Commons hosted a debate on the Taiwan Strait. Subsequently, a delegation of Labour MPs visited Taiwan. In April, it was then announced that the Labour Party would be seeking cooperation with Taiwan in small and medium-enterprise development.
Taiwanese cultural outreach to the UK was seen in the Experience Taiwan festival, held in April at Lyric Square in Hammersmith by the Student Union Republic of China (ROC) Taiwan in the UK and the UK Taiwanese Chamber of Commerce. The event was designed as a way to promote Taiwanese food and culture in the UK, and to provide a place for Taiwanese students to enjoy their home food while overseas. It drew more than 4,000 attendees.
In May, the UK and Taiwan signed an organics equivalence memorandum of understanding, which enabled the resumption of UK exports of most processed organic products to Taiwan and meant the UK regarded Taiwanese organic regulations as sufficiently similar to the UK’s to allow reciprocation.
The UK also joined the US, Australia and Taiwan in staging the Global Cooperation and Training Framework energy transition workshop in Malaysia.
The same month saw a debate called “Defending Taiwan: A roadmap for the urgent policy steps to avoid a war,” attended by the then-British security minister Tom Tugendhat and former US deputy security advisor Matt Pottinger. Pottinger argued that Europe’s role in confronting PRC adventurism toward Taiwan would be mostly diplomatic and economic, but should come well in advance and not when hostilities have already started.
This aligns with the position of the Taiwan Policy Centre that the UK should lead the way in making clear to China the costs it would incur from any military action against Taiwan.
With the UK general election campaign in full swing by June of last year, it was pleasing to see the issue of Taiwan taken seriously by one of the major parties in parliament in the form of the Liberal Democrats issuing their manifesto — the first to explicitly recognize Taiwan as a country and call for deeper diplomatic relations between the UK and Taiwan.
Over in Taiwan, the second Taiwan-UK health technology assessment workshop focused on funding methods for new cancer drugs. That followed a cooperative agreement that the National Health Insurance Administration and the UK’s National Institute for Health Care and Excellence signed in May 2023. In November, the UK and Taiwan hosted a renewable energy conference and dialogue. The UK continues to play a large role in Taiwan’s wind power projects.
In the UK Houses of Parliament, Taiwan was raised numerous times throughout the year with 50 mentions in questions in the Commons and Lords, as well as during four Commons debates and three Lords debates.
In a Commons debate in November, entitled “Taiwan: International Status,” it was resolved that UN Resolution 2758 of Oct. 25, 1971, did not mention Taiwan, did not address the political status of Taiwan or establish PRC sovereignty over Taiwan, and that it was silent on the status of Taiwan in the UN as well as on Taiwanese participation in UN agencies.
The Commons resolution called on the UK Government to clarify its position that UN Resolution 2758 does not establish the “one China” principle as a matter of international law, to state clearly that nothing in law prevents the participation of Taiwan in international organisations, and to condemn efforts made by representatives of the PRC to distort the meaning of UN Resolution 2758 in support of Beijing’s “one China” principle.
This debate and resolution marks a landmark in awareness of the issue of Taiwan, at least in the UK Houses of Parliament. However, for now at least, it appears that a growing realization amongst parliamentarians of the consequences of war between China and Taiwan is not yet moving the needle policy-wise.
The Taiwan Policy Centre argues that it is time for the UK government to rationalize its defense of Taiwan on the grounds of Taiwanese right to self-determination. The Taiwanese already govern themselves as a viable and sovereign state, who determine their own laws and diplomacy. It is time for the UK, and the world, to acknowledge this indisputable fact.
Last year saw three separate Chinese intimidations towards Taiwan in the form of “Joint Sword 2024A” in May after President William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration, and “Joint Sword 2024B” in October after Lai’s National Day speech. A smaller, mostly naval operation took place in the middle of last month. The UK media covered these events, but always through the prism of China relations rather than from Taiwan’s perspective.
So while relations between the UK and Taiwan continue to deepen, to the credit of all involved, awareness of how China threats to Taiwan are real and immediate, and the enormous consequences a blockade or invasion would have on the UK, economically and politically, are not.
We can only hope that this year the UK government would gain a better understanding of what is at stake in the region and for the people who live there. That would be the main focus of the work of the Taiwan Policy Centre this year.
Ben Goren is director of communications for the Taiwan Policy Centre.
In a summer of intense political maneuvering, Taiwanese, whose democratic vibrancy is a constant rebuke to Beijing’s authoritarianism, delivered a powerful verdict not on China, but on their own political leaders. Two high-profile recall campaigns, driven by the ruling party against its opposition, collapsed in failure. It was a clear signal that after months of bitter confrontation, the Taiwanese public is demanding a shift from perpetual campaign mode to the hard work of governing. For Washington and other world capitals, this is more than a distant political drama. The stability of Taiwan is vital, as it serves as a key player
Yesterday’s recall and referendum votes garnered mixed results for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). All seven of the KMT lawmakers up for a recall survived the vote, and by a convincing margin of, on average, 35 percent agreeing versus 65 percent disagreeing. However, the referendum sponsored by the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on restarting the operation of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County failed. Despite three times more “yes” votes than “no,” voter turnout fell short of the threshold. The nation needs energy stability, especially with the complex international security situation and significant challenges regarding
Much like the first round on July 26, Saturday’s second wave of recall elections — this time targeting seven Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers — also failed. With all 31 KMT legislators who faced recall this summer secure in their posts, the mass recall campaign has come to an end. The outcome was unsurprising. Last month’s across-the-board defeats had already dealt a heavy blow to the morale of recall advocates and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), while bolstering the confidence of the KMT and its ally the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). It seemed a foregone conclusion that recalls would falter, as
The fallout from the mass recalls and the referendum on restarting the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant continues to monopolize the news. The general consensus is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been bloodied and found wanting, and is in need of reflection and a course correction if it is to avoid electoral defeat. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has not emerged unscathed, either, but has the opportunity of making a relatively clean break. That depends on who the party on Oct. 18 picks to replace outgoing KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫). What is certain is that, with the dust settling
RSS